tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

SMOG - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

SMOG

VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF (SMOG)

Rating:53Neutral
Price Target:
SMOG, the VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF, has a solid but not top-tier overall rating, largely driven by strong holdings like Tesla and First Solar, which show robust financial performance, growth potential, and supportive valuations. Iberdrola, Enel, and NextEra Energy also contribute positively with stable profitability and dividends, though high debt and some bearish or cautious technical signals, along with weaker names like Rivian and Bloom Energy facing leverage and cash flow challenges, hold the fund back. The main risk factor is the fund’s concentration in low-carbon and clean energy companies, which can make performance more sensitive to sector-specific volatility and policy changes.
Positive Factors
Strong Year-To-Date Performance
The ETF has delivered solid gains so far this year, indicating that its low-carbon energy focus has recently been rewarded by the market.
Global Diversification
Holdings spread across the U.S., Europe, and Asia help reduce the impact of weakness in any single country or region.
Multiple Sector Exposure
Exposure to consumer cyclical, utilities, industrials, technology, and other sectors provides a mix of business types within the low-carbon theme.
Negative Factors
High Concentration in Top Holdings
A small number of companies, including Iberdrola, Bloom Energy, Tesla, and Enel, make up a large share of the fund, increasing the impact if any one of them struggles.
Notable Underperformers in Top Positions
Some major holdings such as Tesla and BYD have shown weak recent performance, which can drag on overall fund returns.
Relatively High Expense Ratio
The fund’s expense ratio is on the higher side for an ETF, which means more of the investment’s gains are used to cover fees.

SMOG vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

SMOG Summary

The VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF (SMOG) tracks the MVIS Global Low Carbon Energy index and focuses on companies helping the world shift to cleaner energy. It holds businesses involved in renewable power, electric vehicles, and energy technology, including well-known names like Tesla and NextEra Energy. Investors might consider SMOG if they want growth potential from the long-term move toward green energy and diversification across many low-carbon companies worldwide. However, because it is concentrated in the clean energy sector, its price can be volatile and may rise or fall sharply as investor sentiment and government policies toward green energy change.
How much will it cost me?The VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF (SMOG) has an expense ratio of 0.61%, which means you’ll pay $6.10 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than the average for ETFs because it is actively managed and focuses on a specialized sector like low-carbon energy, which requires more research and management.
What would affect this ETF?The VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF (SMOG) could benefit from global policies and consumer demand shifting towards renewable energy and electric vehicles, as well as advancements in clean energy technologies. However, it may face challenges from fluctuating energy prices, potential regulatory hurdles, or slower-than-expected adoption of green energy solutions in certain regions. Its global exposure and reliance on top holdings like Tesla and NextEra Energy make it sensitive to changes in the performance of these companies and broader market trends.

SMOG Top 10 Holdings

SMOG is leaning heavily into global clean power and electric vehicles, with European utilities like Iberdrola and Enel providing a steadier backbone while U.S. peer NextEra has seen more mixed momentum. On the flashier side, Tesla is clearly dragging the fund, and Rivian isn’t helping much either, as both EV names have been losing steam. BYD offers a brighter spot with more recently rising performance, and Bloom Energy adds a volatile but energetic growth tilt. Overall, the ETF is tightly focused on low‑carbon energy and EVs across the U.S., Europe, and Asia.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Iberdrola9.04%$11.27M€135.32B35.28%
67
Neutral
NextEra Energy7.97%$9.93M$183.42B23.46%
71
Outperform
Enel S.p.A.7.15%$8.92M€99.96B28.80%
67
Neutral
Tesla6.85%$8.54M$1.22T2.84%
73
Outperform
BYD Co6.45%$8.04MHK$923.23B-16.79%
66
Neutral
4.65%$5.79M
Bloom Energy4.59%$5.73M$61.00B460.48%
62
Neutral
Samsung SDI Co., Ltd3.33%$4.15M₩27.92T78.36%
First Solar3.14%$3.91M$22.14B14.71%
75
Outperform
Rivian Automotive2.97%$3.70M$24.36B22.94%
61
Neutral

SMOG Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
141.90
Negative
100DMA
144.40
Negative
200DMA
139.43
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
-0.91
Negative
RSI
52.01
Neutral
STOCH
92.52
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For SMOG, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 136.89, equal to the 50-day MA of 141.90, and equal to the 200-day MA of 139.43, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.91 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 52.01 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 92.52 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for SMOG.

SMOG Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$134.68M0.64%
53
Neutral
$1.08B0.47%
61
Neutral
$1.04B0.75%
73
Outperform
$932.28M0.40%
62
Neutral
$197.64M0.12%
66
Neutral
$174.97M0.19%
65
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
SMOG
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF
139.55
26.33
23.26%
IHAK
iShares Cybersecurity & Tech ETF
IVES
Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF
GII
SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF
NZAC
SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF
IQSZ
Invesco Global Equity Net Zero ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement