SIMS - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
SPDR S&P Kensho Intelligent Structures ETF (SIMS)
Rating:64Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Performance
The ETF has shown solid gains so far this year and over the past month, indicating positive recent momentum.
Leading Holdings Performing Well
Many of the top positions, including several industrial and technology names, have delivered strong year-to-date results that support the fund’s overall performance.
Targeted Sector Exposure
A focus on industrials and technology gives investors concentrated exposure to companies involved in intelligent infrastructure and related innovations.
Negative Factors
High U.S. Concentration
Almost all assets are invested in U.S. companies, which limits geographic diversification and ties results closely to the U.S. economy.
Sector Concentration Risk
Heavy weighting in industrials and technology means the fund could be hit hard if these sectors face a downturn.
Moderate Expense Ratio
The fund’s fee is higher than many broad, low-cost index ETFs, which can slightly reduce long-term returns.
SIMS vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM8.04M
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.45%
Beta1.17
IssuerSPDR
Inception DateDec 26, 2017
Dividend Yield0.62%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedS&P Kensho Intelligent Infrastructure Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume847
30 Day Avg. Volume677
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
54.48Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering44
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
SIMS Summary
SIMS is the SPDR S&P Kensho Intelligent Structures ETF, which follows the S&P Kensho Intelligent Infrastructure Index. It focuses on companies using technology to modernize infrastructure, such as smart buildings, advanced construction, and efficient water and energy systems. Well-known holdings include Bloom Energy and Xylem. An investor might consider SIMS to seek growth from long-term trends in smarter, more sustainable infrastructure while getting a mix of industrial and technology stocks in one fund. A key risk is that it’s a specialized theme ETF, so its price can swing more than the overall market and may lag if this niche falls out of favor.
How much will it cost me?The SPDR S&P Kensho Intelligent Structures ETF (SIMS) has an expense ratio of 0.45%, meaning you’ll pay $4.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than average because the fund is actively managed to focus on a specific niche of innovative infrastructure companies. The higher cost reflects the specialized research and management involved in maintaining this thematic portfolio.
What would affect this ETF?The SIMS ETF could benefit from increased government spending on infrastructure modernization and the growing adoption of technologies like artificial intelligence and robotics in construction and energy systems. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, which can increase borrowing costs for infrastructure projects, and potential regulatory hurdles affecting technology and energy sectors. Its focus on U.S.-based companies in industries like Industrials and Technology makes it sensitive to domestic economic conditions and innovation trends.
SIMS Top 10 Holdings
SIMS is leaning heavily into U.S. industrials and tech tied to “smart” infrastructure, and a few names are clearly steering the ship. Bloom Energy and Silicon Laboratories have been rising, giving the fund a helpful tailwind as investors warm to cleaner power and connected devices. Select Energy Services and Arlo Technologies are also pulling their weight, adding some spark from energy services and smart-home security. On the flip side, Generac, Hawkins, Resideo, and Itron have been lagging, showing that not every piece of the intelligent-infrastructure puzzle is clicking at once.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Silicon Laboratories | 4.44% | $357.21K | $6.93B | 111.61% | 56 Neutral | |
| Bloom Energy | 4.14% | $332.84K | $41.18B | 721.38% | 62 Neutral | |
| Select Energy Services | 3.89% | $312.96K | $2.11B | 92.00% | 62 Neutral | |
| Johnson Controls | 3.55% | $285.21K | $85.08B | 76.33% | 70 Outperform | |
| Generac Holdings | 3.54% | $284.55K | $11.91B | 77.00% | 59 Neutral | |
| Mueller Water Products | 3.49% | $280.85K | $4.54B | 16.86% | 77 Outperform | |
| Hawkins | 3.23% | $260.01K | $3.07B | 30.96% | 58 Neutral | |
| Resideo Technologies | 3.06% | $245.81K | $5.54B | 125.92% | 51 Neutral | |
| Arlo Technologies | 3.04% | $244.43K | $1.45B | 44.22% | 59 Neutral | |
| Suncor Energy | 2.90% | $233.56K | $76.46B | 88.66% | ― |
SIMS Technical Analysis
Positive
―
Price Trends
43.77
Negative
43.51
Negative
41.98
Positive
Market Momentum
-0.34
Negative
54.60
Neutral
78.92
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For SIMS, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 42.33, equal to the 50-day MA of 43.77, and equal to the 200-day MA of 41.98, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.34 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 54.60 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 78.92 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for SIMS.
SIMS Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
SIMS
SPDR S&P Kensho Intelligent Structures ETF
43.70
16.02
57.88%
MILN
Global X Millennial Consumer ETF
―
―
―
ROKT
SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF
―
―
―
CEPI
REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF
―
―
―
RBLD
First Trust Alerian US NextGen Infrastructure ETF
―
―
―
HWAY
Themes US Infrastructure ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents