Education
About Us
Working with TipRanks
Follow Us
SHPP - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF (SHPP)
Rating:66Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Top Holdings
Several key holdings, such as ABB Ltd and Norfolk Southern, have delivered strong year-to-date performance, boosting the ETF's overall returns.
Global Diversification
The ETF includes exposure to multiple countries, such as Germany, Sweden, and Japan, reducing reliance on a single geographic market.
Solid Sector Focus
The ETF's heavy allocation to the Industrials sector aligns with its theme and benefits from steady demand in logistics and infrastructure.
Negative Factors
Underperforming Holdings
Some top holdings, like United Parcel and FedEx, have lagged in performance, which could weigh on future returns.
High Expense Ratio
The ETF's expense ratio of 0.6% is higher than many similar funds, potentially reducing net returns for investors.
Sector Concentration Risk
With over 70% of its portfolio in Industrials, the ETF is highly exposed to risks specific to this sector.
SHPP vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM3.62M
RegionGlobal
Expense Ratio0.60%
Beta0.85
IssuerPacer
Inception DateJun 08, 2022
Dividend Yield1.75%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedPacer Global Supply Chain Infrastructure Index - Benchmark TR Net
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume158
30 Day Avg. Volume5,876
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
32.55Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering92
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
SHPP Summary
The Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF (SHPP) is an investment fund that focuses on companies in the industrial and logistics sectors, which are essential for moving goods and managing supply chains globally. It includes well-known companies like Union Pacific and FedEx, giving investors exposure to transportation and logistics businesses that benefit from trends like e-commerce growth and globalization. This ETF could be a good choice for someone looking to invest in industries that support global commerce and economic activity. However, new investors should be aware that its performance can be affected by economic slowdowns or disruptions in global trade.
How much will it cost me?The Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF (SHPP) has an expense ratio of 0.6%, which means you’ll pay $6 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because it is a sector-focused ETF, which typically involves more active management compared to broad market index funds. The higher cost reflects the specialized approach to investing in logistics and industrial companies.
What would affect this ETF?The Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF (SHPP) could benefit from trends like the growth of e-commerce, advancements in supply chain technology, and increased globalization, which drive demand for logistics and transportation services. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, which can increase borrowing costs for industrial companies, and potential economic slowdowns that could reduce global trade activity. Its global exposure and focus on industrials and logistics make it sensitive to both technological innovation and broader economic conditions.
SHPP Top 10 Holdings
The Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF (SHPP) leans heavily into the industrials sector, with logistics giants like Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern driving steady performance thanks to strong financials and strategic initiatives. DHL Group has been a standout, rising on operational efficiency and robust momentum, while FedEx is also climbing, buoyed by earnings resilience. However, SAP SE is lagging, weighed down by bearish trends and valuation concerns. With a global focus and a tilt toward transportation and supply chain leaders, SHPP offers a concentrated play on the backbone of global commerce.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ABB Ltd | 9.88% | $357.89K | kr1.26T | 23.53% | 78 Outperform | |
| Union Pacific | 9.60% | $347.69K | $135.50B | 0.05% | 72 Outperform | |
| SAP SE | 9.43% | $341.63K | €241.78B | -13.84% | 66 Neutral | |
| United Parcel | 4.49% | $162.85K | $91.68B | -14.15% | 72 Outperform | |
| FedEx | 4.15% | $150.25K | $73.44B | 12.36% | 79 Outperform | |
| Norfolk Southern | 3.96% | $143.32K | $70.28B | 20.69% | 75 Outperform | |
| DHL Group | 3.77% | $136.51K | €52.98B | 44.52% | 76 Outperform | |
| CSX | 3.69% | $133.62K | $65.55B | 9.58% | 78 Outperform | |
| Canadian Pacific Kansas City | 3.63% | $131.61K | $64.61B | -3.45% | 74 Outperform | |
| ― | 3.54% | $128.10K | ― | ― | ― |
SHPP Technical Analysis
Positive
―
Price Trends
29.09
Positive
28.59
Positive
27.69
Positive
Market Momentum
0.32
Negative
64.93
Neutral
93.26
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For SHPP, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 29.76, equal to the 50-day MA of 29.09, and equal to the 200-day MA of 27.69, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.32 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 64.93 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 93.26 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for SHPP.
SHPP Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
SHPP
Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF
30.30
3.91
14.82%
SPTE
SP Funds S&P Global Technology ETF
―
―
―
FMED
Fidelity Disruptive Medicine ETF
―
―
―
NATO
Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF
―
―
―
WDGF
WisdomTree Global Defense Fund
―
―
―
SUPL
ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
Disclaimer
This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents