Education
About Us
Working with TipRanks
Follow Us
RZV - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 Pure Value ETF (RZV)
Rating:61Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Performance
The ETF has shown solid gains over the past month, three months, and year-to-date, indicating positive recent momentum.
Broad Sector Diversification
Holdings are spread across many sectors, which helps reduce the impact if any single industry runs into trouble.
Multiple Strong Top Holdings
Several of the largest positions, such as CarMax and Newell Brands, have delivered strong year-to-date performance that supports the fund’s returns.
Negative Factors
Heavy U.S.-Only Exposure
Almost all assets are invested in U.S. companies, offering little geographic diversification if the U.S. market weakens.
Concentration in Consumer Cyclical Stocks
A large share of the portfolio is in consumer cyclical companies, which can be more sensitive to economic slowdowns.
Moderate Expense Ratio
The fund’s expense ratio is not especially low, meaning fees take a noticeable, ongoing bite out of investor returns.
RZV vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM263.90M
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.35%
Beta1.01
IssuerInvesco
Inception DateMar 01, 2006
Dividend Yield1.45%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedS&P Small Cap 600 Pure Value
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume10,003
30 Day Avg. Volume8,077
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
149.89Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering162
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
RZV Summary
RZV is the Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Value ETF, which follows the S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Value Index. It invests in smaller U.S. companies that appear cheap based on their financials, aiming to find stocks that may be undervalued. The fund holds a wide mix of sectors, including consumer, industrial, and tech names, with companies like CarMax and Newell Brands among its top positions. Someone might invest in RZV for growth potential and diversification into smaller, value-focused U.S. stocks. A key risk is that small-cap value stocks can be very volatile and can go up and down more than the overall market.
How much will it cost me?The Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 Pure Value ETF (RZV) has an expense ratio of 0.35%, which means you’ll pay $3.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than average because it is focused on a niche strategy of actively tracking small-cap value stocks, which requires more management compared to broad, passively managed ETFs.
What would affect this ETF?The Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 Pure Value ETF (RZV) could benefit from a strong U.S. economy, as small-cap stocks often thrive during periods of economic growth and consumer spending, particularly in sectors like Consumer Cyclical and Financials, which have significant weight in the ETF. However, rising interest rates or economic slowdowns could negatively impact small-cap companies, as they tend to have higher borrowing costs and are more sensitive to market volatility. Additionally, sector-specific challenges, such as fluctuating energy prices or changes in consumer behavior, could influence the performance of top holdings like ViaSat and Par Pacific Holdings.
RZV Top 10 Holdings
RZV is leaning hard into U.S. small-cap value, with a big tilt toward economically sensitive names. Industrial and consumer plays like ArcBest and Stepan are quietly rising, helping to pull the fund forward, while Ichor’s rebound adds a bit of tech-powered lift. On the flip side, Newell Brands and ManpowerGroup look tired, with weaker trends that can act like sandbags on performance. Overall, the ETF is diversified across many small positions but thematically concentrated in cyclical, U.S.-focused value names that tend to move with the broader economy.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ichor Holdings | 1.64% | $4.21M | $1.86B | 78.30% | 49 Neutral | |
| Edgewell Personal Care | 1.45% | $3.72M | $1.05B | -29.36% | 58 Neutral | |
| Newell Brands | 1.42% | $3.64M | $1.93B | -31.90% | 49 Neutral | |
| MillerKnoll | 1.34% | $3.42M | $1.45B | -5.57% | 57 Neutral | |
| Marinemax | 1.25% | $3.20M | $628.00M | 7.42% | 51 Neutral | |
| Titan International | 1.23% | $3.14M | $674.05M | 21.29% | 58 Neutral | |
| Acadia Healthcare | 1.22% | $3.12M | $1.58B | -59.46% | 61 Neutral | |
| ArcBest | 1.16% | $2.96M | $2.25B | 19.73% | 66 Neutral | |
| Patterson-UTI | 1.15% | $2.94M | $3.16B | 2.59% | 56 Neutral | |
| Adient | 1.14% | $2.91M | $1.95B | 47.28% | 53 Neutral |
RZV Technical Analysis
Neutral
―
Price Trends
127.40
Positive
122.32
Positive
115.05
Positive
Market Momentum
1.44
Positive
49.07
Neutral
27.77
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For RZV, the sentiment is Neutral. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 132.45, equal to the 50-day MA of 127.40, and equal to the 200-day MA of 115.05, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of 1.44 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 49.07 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 27.77 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Neutral sentiment for RZV.
RZV Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
RZV
Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 Pure Value ETF
130.79
27.02
26.04%
OSCV
Opus Small Cap Value ETF
―
―
―
ISCV
iShares Morningstar Small Cap Value ETF
―
―
―
XSVM
Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF
―
―
―
SVAL
iShares US Small Cap Value Factor ETF
―
―
―
TSCV
Thrivent Small Cap Value ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
Disclaimer
This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents