RWJ - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF (RWJ)
Rating:64Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Performance
The ETF has shown solid gains over the past month, three months, and year-to-date, indicating positive recent momentum.
Revenue-Weighted Small-Cap Exposure
By focusing on smaller U.S. companies and weighting them by revenue, the fund tilts toward businesses with meaningful sales rather than just market size.
Broad Sector Diversification
Holdings are spread across many sectors, with notable exposure to consumer cyclical, industrials, financials, and technology, which helps reduce reliance on any single industry.
Negative Factors
Higher Expense Ratio for a Passive ETF
The fund’s expense ratio is on the higher side for an index-based ETF, which can modestly reduce long-term returns compared with cheaper alternatives.
Concentration in Consumer Cyclical Stocks
A large portion of the portfolio is in consumer cyclical companies, which can be more sensitive to economic slowdowns and shifts in consumer spending.
Single-Country Risk
With almost all assets invested in U.S. stocks, the ETF offers little geographic diversification and is heavily tied to the U.S. economy and market conditions.
RWJ vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM1.72B
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.39%
Beta1.01
IssuerInvesco
Inception DateFeb 19, 2008
Dividend Yield1.09%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedS&P SmallCap 600 Revenue-Weighted Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume52,804
30 Day Avg. Volume87,248
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
61.29Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering599
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
RWJ Summary
RWJ is the Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF, which follows the S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue-Weighted Index. It focuses on smaller U.S. companies across many industries, including consumer, industrial, and financial businesses. Instead of weighting by size, it gives more weight to companies that bring in higher revenue. Well-known holdings include CarMax and Lincoln National. Someone might invest in RWJ for growth potential and diversification into smaller, often overlooked U.S. companies. A key risk is that small-cap stocks can be more volatile and can go up and down more sharply than larger, more established companies.
How much will it cost me?The Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF (RWJ) has an expense ratio of 0.39%, which means you’ll pay $3.90 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than the average for ETFs because it uses an actively managed revenue-weighted strategy rather than simply tracking a standard index. This approach aims to focus on companies with strong financial fundamentals.
What would affect this ETF?RWJ's focus on U.S. small-cap companies could benefit from economic growth and innovation in sectors like Consumer Cyclical and Technology, which are heavily weighted in the ETF. However, small-cap stocks are often more sensitive to interest rate hikes and economic slowdowns, which could negatively impact their performance. Additionally, regulatory changes or sector-specific challenges in industries like Energy or Financials could influence the ETF's returns.
RWJ Top 10 Holdings
RWJ is leaning hard into U.S. small-cap consumer and industrial names, and that mix is creating a real push‑and‑pull in performance. The Andersons has been one of the fund’s bright spots, quietly climbing and helping to offset weakness elsewhere, while United Natural Foods has also been more of a steady helper than a hindrance. On the flip side, auto dealers like Group 1 Automotive and Asbury, along with Lincoln National, have been losing steam and dragging on returns. Overall, it’s a domestically focused, small-cap story with a cyclical tilt and plenty of volatility under the hood.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Molina Healthcare | 2.85% | $48.72M | $7.60B | -57.72% | 71 Outperform | |
| World Kinect | 2.31% | $39.50M | $1.20B | -2.42% | 51 Neutral | |
| United Natural Foods | 2.28% | $38.90M | $2.81B | 91.08% | 52 Neutral | |
| CarMax | 1.93% | $33.02M | $6.62B | -31.66% | 61 Neutral | |
| Group 1 Automotive | 1.54% | $26.33M | $4.01B | -16.51% | 73 Outperform | |
| Lincoln National | 1.22% | $20.91M | $6.50B | 15.93% | 71 Outperform | |
| Asbury | 1.16% | $19.86M | $3.94B | -10.64% | 67 Neutral | |
| ManpowerGroup | 1.12% | $19.11M | $1.25B | -47.30% | 54 Neutral | |
| Sonic Automotive | 1.06% | $18.12M | $2.28B | 13.28% | 61 Neutral | |
| Kohl's | 0.96% | $16.37M | $1.49B | 97.62% | 68 Neutral |
RWJ Technical Analysis
Positive
―
Price Trends
51.57
Positive
50.58
Positive
48.50
Positive
Market Momentum
0.46
Negative
67.24
Neutral
94.60
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For RWJ, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 50.48, equal to the 50-day MA of 51.57, and equal to the 200-day MA of 48.50, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.46 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 67.24 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 94.60 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for RWJ.
RWJ Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
RWJ
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF
53.38
16.98
46.65%
FNDA
Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF
―
―
―
FESM
Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF
―
―
―
VIOO
Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 ETF
―
―
―
SMLF
iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Multifactor ETF
―
―
―
CALF
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents