tiprankstipranks
Trending News
More News >
Advertisement

RWJ - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

RWJ

Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF (RWJ)

Rating:64Neutral
Price Target:
RWJ, the Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF, has a solid overall rating driven by strong contributors like Amentum Holdings, Group 1 Automotive, Lincoln National, and Asbury, which show healthy financial performance, supportive technical trends, and shareholder-friendly actions. However, weaker holdings such as United Natural Foods, World Kinect, ManpowerGroup, and Adient face profitability, leverage, and bearish technical challenges that weigh on the fund’s rating. The main risk is its exposure to several small-cap companies with financial and technical headwinds, which can increase volatility and pressure returns if those challenges persist.
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Performance
The ETF has shown solid gains over the past month, three months, and year-to-date, indicating positive recent momentum.
Revenue-Weighted Small-Cap Exposure
By focusing on smaller U.S. companies and weighting them by revenue, the fund tilts toward businesses with meaningful sales rather than just market size.
Broad Sector Diversification
Holdings are spread across many sectors, with notable exposure to consumer cyclical, industrials, financials, and technology, which helps reduce reliance on any single industry.
Negative Factors
Higher Expense Ratio for a Passive ETF
The fund’s expense ratio is on the higher side for an index-based ETF, which can modestly reduce long-term returns compared with cheaper alternatives.
Concentration in Consumer Cyclical Stocks
A large portion of the portfolio is in consumer cyclical companies, which can be more sensitive to economic slowdowns and shifts in consumer spending.
Single-Country Risk
With almost all assets invested in U.S. stocks, the ETF offers little geographic diversification and is heavily tied to the U.S. economy and market conditions.

RWJ vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

RWJ Summary

RWJ is the Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF, which follows the S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue-Weighted Index. It focuses on smaller U.S. companies across many industries, including consumer, industrial, and financial businesses. Instead of weighting by size, it gives more weight to companies that bring in higher revenue. Well-known holdings include CarMax and Lincoln National. Someone might invest in RWJ for growth potential and diversification into smaller, often overlooked U.S. companies. A key risk is that small-cap stocks can be more volatile and can go up and down more sharply than larger, more established companies.
How much will it cost me?The Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF (RWJ) has an expense ratio of 0.39%, which means you’ll pay $3.90 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than the average for ETFs because it uses an actively managed revenue-weighted strategy rather than simply tracking a standard index. This approach aims to focus on companies with strong financial fundamentals.
What would affect this ETF?RWJ's focus on U.S. small-cap companies could benefit from economic growth and innovation in sectors like Consumer Cyclical and Technology, which are heavily weighted in the ETF. However, small-cap stocks are often more sensitive to interest rate hikes and economic slowdowns, which could negatively impact their performance. Additionally, regulatory changes or sector-specific challenges in industries like Energy or Financials could influence the ETF's returns.

RWJ Top 10 Holdings

RWJ leans heavily into U.S. small-cap consumer and industrial names, and its top holdings tell a story of mixed but improving momentum. United Natural Foods has been a quiet bright spot, rising steadily despite past financial hiccups, while CarMax and Adient have shifted into higher gear recently after earlier bumps in the road. On the flip side, Group 1 Automotive and ManpowerGroup are losing steam, acting as mild brakes on performance. Overall, the fund is diversified across many smaller players rather than dominated by any single stock or sector giant.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
United Natural Foods2.91%$46.39M$2.53B55.85%
52
Neutral
World Kinect2.58%$41.26M$1.17B-18.45%
51
Neutral
CarMax2.00%$32.00M$5.93B-40.14%
61
Neutral
ManpowerGroup1.17%$18.65M$1.20B-57.12%
54
Neutral
Group 1 Automotive1.15%$18.37M$3.58B-22.29%
73
Outperform
The Andersons1.14%$18.14M$2.40B68.79%
71
Outperform
Adient1.09%$17.42M$1.55B38.86%
53
Neutral
Asbury1.02%$16.33M$3.78B-14.91%
67
Neutral
Lincoln National1.02%$16.31M$6.20B-9.64%
71
Outperform
Sonic Automotive0.99%$15.74M$2.01B1.80%
61
Neutral

RWJ Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Negative
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
52.12
Negative
100DMA
50.17
Negative
200DMA
47.76
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
-0.79
Positive
RSI
29.06
Positive
STOCH
22.32
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For RWJ, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 51.94, equal to the 50-day MA of 52.12, and equal to the 200-day MA of 47.76, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.79 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 29.06 is Positive, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 22.32 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for RWJ.

RWJ Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$1.60B0.39%
64
Neutral
$9.18B0.25%
67
Neutral
$3.92B0.28%
65
Neutral
$3.31B0.07%
66
Neutral
$3.25B0.59%
69
Neutral
$3.22B0.15%
67
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
RWJ
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF
49.24
8.14
19.81%
FNDA
Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF
FESM
Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF
VIOO
Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 ETF
CALF
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF
SMLF
iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Multifactor ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement