tiprankstipranks
Trending News
More News >
Advertisement

RSPT - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

RSPT

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT)

Rating:71Outperform
Price Target:
RSPT, the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF, earns a solid overall rating thanks to several strong semiconductor and tech hardware holdings like Micron, Lam Research, KLA, and Applied Materials, which benefit from robust financial performance, positive earnings calls, and strong positioning in AI and advanced technologies. The rating is held back somewhat by weaker names such as SanDisk and Seagate, where valuation and balance sheet concerns appear, and by broader risks like high valuations across several holdings and exposure to regulatory and trade issues, particularly related to China and U.S. export controls.
Positive Factors
Strong Top Holdings
Several of the largest positions, such as SanDisk, Micron, Lam Research, and Intel, have shown strong year-to-date gains, helping support the fund’s overall results.
Equal-Weight Technology Exposure
By spreading investments more evenly across many tech stocks instead of concentrating in just a few giants, the ETF reduces reliance on any single company’s performance.
Healthy Asset Base
The fund manages several billion dollars in assets, suggesting it has enough scale and investor interest to support stable trading and operations.
Negative Factors
Single-Sector Concentration
With almost all assets in technology and a small slice in communication services, the ETF is heavily exposed to swings in the tech sector.
Limited Geographic Diversification
The portfolio is almost entirely invested in U.S. companies, offering little protection if the U.S. market or economy weakens.
Moderate Expense Ratio
The fund’s expense ratio is higher than many broad market index ETFs, which can slightly reduce long-term returns for buy-and-hold investors.

RSPT vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

RSPT Summary

RSPT is the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF, which follows the S&P 500 Equal Weighted Information Technology index. It invests mainly in U.S. tech companies and gives each stock a similar weight instead of letting the biggest companies dominate. Well-known holdings include Intel and Applied Materials. Someone might invest in RSPT to get diversified exposure to many different technology businesses that could benefit from long-term growth in areas like chips, software, and cloud computing. A key risk is that it is heavily focused on technology, so its price can swing a lot and may fall sharply if the tech sector struggles.
How much will it cost me?The Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT) has an expense ratio of 0.40%, meaning you’ll pay $4 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than average because the fund is actively managed with an equal-weight approach, which requires more frequent adjustments compared to passively managed ETFs.
What would affect this ETF?The Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT) could benefit from continued advancements in technology, such as growth in cloud computing, artificial intelligence, and semiconductor innovation, which are key areas for its top holdings. However, rising interest rates or regulatory changes targeting the tech sector could negatively impact profitability and valuations, especially for companies heavily reliant on borrowing or facing increased scrutiny. Additionally, its focus on U.S.-based technology companies means it is sensitive to domestic economic conditions and geopolitical risks.

RSPT Top 10 Holdings

RSPT is essentially a U.S. semiconductor and hardware story, with chip and memory names setting the tone. Micron, Lam Research, and Applied Materials have been rising on the back of AI-related demand, giving the fund a solid tailwind. Western Digital and Seagate are also climbing as storage demand recovers, adding steady support. Intel looks more mixed: the stock has perked up, but lingering profitability issues keep it from really pulling its weight. With an equal-weight approach, no single giant dominates, but the fund is clearly riding the semiconductor cycle.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
SanDisk Corp3.70%$147.36M$86.26B
55
Neutral
Western Digital2.18%$86.97M$91.34B316.27%
77
Outperform
Micron2.12%$84.67M$427.02B305.34%
79
Outperform
Seagate Tech2.07%$82.32M$91.29B338.68%
68
Neutral
Teradyne1.94%$77.44M$42.14B138.94%
71
Outperform
Lam Research1.84%$73.23M$261.97B156.02%
77
Outperform
Texas Instruments1.81%$72.03M$202.55B22.76%
78
Outperform
Teledyne Technologies1.80%$71.61M$29.57B22.16%
71
Outperform
Intel1.76%$69.96M$242.76B147.33%
64
Neutral
Corning1.72%$68.36M$94.04B105.84%
74
Outperform

RSPT Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Neutral
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
46.31
Negative
100DMA
45.56
Positive
200DMA
42.45
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
0.20
Positive
RSI
43.62
Neutral
STOCH
32.32
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For RSPT, the sentiment is Neutral. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 47.21, equal to the 50-day MA of 46.31, and equal to the 200-day MA of 42.45, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of 0.20 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 43.62 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 32.32 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Neutral sentiment for RSPT.

RSPT Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$4.16B0.40%
$3.00B0.55%
$2.64B0.60%
$1.71B0.35%
$1.60B0.35%
$1.42B0.62%
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
RSPT
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF
45.89
6.95
17.85%
QTEC
First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund
SKYY
First Trust Cloud Computing ETF
XSD
SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF
XNTK
Spdr Nyse Technology Etf
FXL
First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement