RFFC - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
RiverFront Dynamic US Flex-Cap ETF (RFFC)
Rating:73Outperform
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Performance
The ETF has shown solid gains so far this year and over the past month, indicating positive recent momentum.
Broad Sector Diversification
Holdings are spread across many sectors, with meaningful exposure to technology, industrials, health care, financials, and consumer-related companies, which helps reduce reliance on any single industry.
Leading Growth Companies in Top Holdings
Several of the largest positions, including major technology and industrial names, have delivered strong year-to-date performance, supporting the fund’s overall returns.
Negative Factors
Moderately High Expense Ratio
The fund’s expense ratio is higher than many low-cost index ETFs, which can gradually reduce net returns for long-term investors.
Heavy U.S. Market Focus
With the vast majority of assets invested in U.S. companies, the ETF offers limited geographic diversification and is highly tied to the U.S. market’s fortunes.
Mixed Results Among Top Tech Holdings
Some major technology positions, such as Microsoft and Apple, have shown weak or negative year-to-date performance, which could weigh on the fund if this trend continues.
RFFC vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM29.96M
RegionGlobal
Expense Ratio0.48%
Beta0.89
IssuerALPS
Inception DateJun 06, 2016
Dividend Yield0.73%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedNo Underlying Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume741
30 Day Avg. Volume1,229
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
85.76Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering58
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
RFFC Summary
The RiverFront Dynamic US Flex-Cap ETF (RFFC) is an actively managed fund that aims to cover the full U.S. stock market rather than tracking a specific index. It can invest in companies of all sizes and across many sectors, with a tilt toward technology, and holds well-known names like Microsoft and Apple. Someone might consider this ETF for broad diversification in a single fund and the potential for long-term growth from leading U.S. companies. A key risk is that it is heavily invested in stocks, especially tech, so its value can rise and fall sharply with the overall market.
How much will it cost me?The RiverFront Dynamic US Flex-Cap ETF (RFFC) has an expense ratio of 0.48%, which means you’ll pay $4.80 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than average because it is actively managed, allowing for dynamic adjustments across market capitalizations to respond to changing market conditions.
What would affect this ETF?The RiverFront Dynamic US Flex-Cap ETF (RFFC) could benefit from growth in the technology sector, which makes up a significant portion of its holdings, as well as strong performance from top companies like Nvidia, Microsoft, and Apple. However, it may face challenges if interest rates rise, which could negatively impact growth stocks, or if economic uncertainty affects consumer spending and financial markets. Its broad exposure to the U.S. market provides diversification, but reliance on certain sectors like technology and financials may increase vulnerability to sector-specific downturns.
RFFC Top 10 Holdings
RFFC is leaning heavily on U.S. Big Tech, with Alphabet, Apple, Nvidia, and Amazon doing most of the heavy lifting as they ride strong momentum in AI, cloud, and digital spending. Microsoft looks a bit tired in the short term, and Meta is clearly lagging, so not every tech giant is firing on all cylinders. Outside tech, Caterpillar and a resurgent Intel are surprising standouts, giving the fund an industrial and chipmaker kicker. Despite its “total market” label, the story here is a tech-centric, U.S.-driven portfolio with a global flavor via TSMC.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alphabet Class A | 5.31% | $1.55M | $4.45T | 112.19% | 85 Outperform | |
| Apple | 5.26% | $1.54M | $4.51T | 50.72% | 79 Outperform | |
| Microsoft | 5.00% | $1.46M | $3.10T | -11.42% | 79 Outperform | |
| Nvidia | 3.97% | $1.16M | $4.96T | 44.72% | 76 Outperform | |
| TSMC | 3.90% | $1.14M | $1.94T | 102.34% | 81 Outperform | |
| Caterpillar | 3.84% | $1.12M | $416.54B | 155.92% | 76 Outperform | |
| Amazon | 3.65% | $1.07M | $2.65T | 15.20% | 71 Outperform | |
| Johnson & Johnson | 3.59% | $1.05M | $560.33B | 50.14% | 78 Outperform | |
| Goldman Sachs Group | 2.43% | $712.53K | $306.42B | 69.17% | 73 Outperform | |
| Lam Research | 2.37% | $692.39K | $379.27B | 251.22% | 77 Outperform |
RFFC Technical Analysis
Positive
―
Price Trends
71.33
Positive
70.22
Positive
67.60
Positive
Market Momentum
0.74
Positive
52.02
Neutral
56.35
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For RFFC, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 73.39, equal to the 50-day MA of 71.33, and equal to the 200-day MA of 67.60, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of 0.74 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 52.02 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 56.35 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for RFFC.
RFFC Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
RFFC
RiverFront Dynamic US Flex-Cap ETF
73.39
15.06
25.82%
GINX
SGI Enhanced Global Income ETF
―
―
―
RJDI
RJ Eagle GCM Dividend Select Income ETF
―
―
―
GOP
Unusual Whales Subversive Republican Trading ETF
―
―
―
SAGP
Strategas Global Policy Opportunities ETF
―
―
―
CAMX
Cambiar Aggressive Value ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents