tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

QWLD - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

QWLD

SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF (QWLD)

Rating:71Outperform
Price Target:
QWLD’s rating reflects a solid, high-quality global portfolio led by powerhouse holdings like Alphabet, Microsoft, and Apple, whose strong financial performance, leadership in AI and cloud, and positive earnings outlooks provide a strong foundation for the fund. The rating is held back somewhat by high valuations and some mixed or bearish technical signals in key names like Nvidia and Visa, which introduce the risk that expectations may already be high. A key risk factor is the fund’s meaningful exposure to large technology and semiconductor companies, which can make performance more sensitive to shifts in tech sentiment and growth expectations.
Positive Factors
Strong Overall Year-to-Date Performance
The ETF has delivered solid gains so far this year, suggesting its strategy has been working well in the current market.
High-Quality Global Diversification
Holdings spread across major markets like the U.S., Japan, the UK, and Europe help reduce the impact of problems in any single country.
Balanced Sector Mix with Leading Companies
The fund invests across technology, financials, health care, and other sectors, with several well-known companies showing strong or steady performance.
Negative Factors
Heavy U.S. Concentration
With most of its assets in U.S. stocks, the ETF is heavily exposed to the American market and less balanced globally than it might appear.
Dependence on Mega-Cap Tech and Communication Stocks
A meaningful share of the portfolio is tied to large technology and communication companies, which can make the fund more sensitive to swings in those areas.
Moderate Expense Ratio
The fund’s fees are not especially low for a broad equity ETF, which slightly reduces the net return investors keep over time.

QWLD vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

QWLD Summary

QWLD is the SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF, which follows the MSCI World Factor Mix A-Series Index. It invests in stocks from developed countries around the world, with a big share in the U.S., and mixes companies chosen for value, quality, and lower price swings. Well-known holdings include Apple and Microsoft. Someone might invest in QWLD to get broad global stock market exposure in a single fund, with built-in diversification across sectors like technology, finance, and health care. A key risk is that it still invests in stocks, so its value can rise and fall with global markets.
How much will it cost me?The SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF (QWLD) has an expense ratio of 0.3%, which means you’ll pay $3 per year for every $1,000 invested. This cost is slightly higher than average for ETFs because it is actively managed to combine strategic factors like Value, Quality, and Low Volatility, offering a more tailored investment approach. It’s designed to balance risk and return while providing global equity exposure.
What would affect this ETF?The SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF (QWLD) could benefit from continued growth in the technology sector, which is its largest exposure, as well as strong performance from top holdings like Microsoft and Apple. However, rising interest rates or economic slowdowns in developed markets could negatively impact its financial and consumer cyclical sector exposure, while geopolitical tensions might affect global equity performance overall.

QWLD Top 10 Holdings

QWLD leans heavily on Big Tech, with Apple and Nvidia doing much of the heavy lifting as they continue to climb on the back of strong demand for devices and AI. Microsoft and Meta, however, look a bit tired, with more mixed and recently lagging performance that can occasionally put a lid on gains. Broadcom and ASML add another layer of semiconductor punch, while health care names like Eli Lilly and Johnson & Johnson provide a steadier, defensive backbone. Overall, it’s a developed-markets fund with a clear tech-and-health tilt driving the story.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Microsoft2.86%$4.98M$3.45T-8.96%
79
Outperform
Apple2.41%$4.19M$4.54T49.21%
79
Outperform
Nvidia2.18%$3.80M$4.86T14.80%
76
Outperform
Broadcom1.76%$3.07M$1.85T31.74%
76
Outperform
Meta Platforms1.74%$3.03M$1.42T-23.97%
76
Outperform
Eli Lilly & Co1.36%$2.38M$1.08T45.82%
72
Outperform
Johnson & Johnson1.34%$2.34M$617.78B48.74%
78
Outperform
Visa1.20%$2.09M$651.42B6.87%
70
Outperform
Alphabet Class A1.14%$1.98M$4.36T91.50%
85
Outperform
ASML Holding NV1.14%$1.98M€547.84B135.43%
76
Outperform

QWLD Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
152.32
Positive
100DMA
149.26
Positive
200DMA
146.09
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
1.19
Negative
RSI
72.43
Negative
STOCH
96.88
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For QWLD, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 153.86, equal to the 50-day MA of 152.32, and equal to the 200-day MA of 146.09, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 1.19 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 72.43 is Negative, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 96.88 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for QWLD.

QWLD Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$174.39M0.30%
71
Outperform
$8.08B0.24%
72
Outperform
$1.73B0.15%
72
Outperform
$653.17M0.30%
63
Neutral
$266.79M0.15%
66
Neutral
$235.26M0.50%
74
Outperform
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
QWLD
SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF
158.42
26.84
20.40%
URTH
iShares MSCI World ETF
GSWO
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Equity ETF
WSML
iShares MSCI World Small-Cap ETF
IQSI
IQ Candriam ESG International Equity ETF
GDIV
Harbor Dividend Growth Leaders ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement