tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

QQH - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

QQH

HCM Defender 100 Index ETF (QQH)

Rating:61Neutral
Price Target:
QQH, the HCM Defender 100 Index ETF, has a solid overall rating driven mainly by large positions in high-quality tech leaders like Apple, Microsoft, and Nvidia, which benefit from strong financial performance and long-term growth in areas such as AI, cloud, and services. Alphabet (both GOOGL and GOOG) further supports the fund’s quality with strong profitability and a positive outlook in AI and cloud. The main risk is that many of these top holdings are expensive, growth-focused tech names, so the fund is exposed to valuation risk and concentration in a single, tech-heavy segment of the market.
Positive Factors
Leading Tech and Growth Companies
The ETF’s largest positions include several well-known technology and consumer companies that have shown strong or steady recent performance, which can support the fund’s returns.
Broad Sector Mix Beyond Technology
While technology is the main focus, the fund also holds stocks in communication services, consumer, health care, and other sectors, which helps spread risk across different parts of the economy.
Recent Short-Term Performance Rebound
Despite a weak showing so far this year, the ETF has seen a strong recent one-month gain, suggesting some positive short-term momentum.
Negative Factors
High Expense Ratio
The fund charges a relatively high management fee, which can eat into investor returns over time compared with lower-cost ETFs.
Heavy Concentration in Technology and a Few Stocks
Nearly half of the portfolio is in technology and a small group of large holdings like Nvidia, Apple, and Microsoft, increasing the impact if these companies or the tech sector struggle.
Recent Overall Performance Weakness
The ETF’s performance over the year to date and the last three months has been negative, partly reflecting lagging returns from some major holdings such as Microsoft and Tesla.

QQH vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

QQH Summary

The HCM Defender 100 Index ETF (QQH) tracks the HCM Defender 100 Index, focusing mainly on information technology and other modern, growth-oriented companies. It holds many big names such as Apple and Nvidia, along with other major tech and consumer brands, giving investors a way to tap into digital transformation and innovation in one fund. Someone might invest in QQH to seek long-term growth and get diversified exposure to leading tech-driven businesses. However, because it leans heavily on technology and growth stocks, its price can rise and fall sharply with swings in the tech sector and overall market.
How much will it cost me?The HCM Defender 100 Index ETF (Ticker: QQH) has an expense ratio of 1.02%, which means you’ll pay $10.20 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because it is actively managed, focusing on a specialized sector like technology, which typically involves more research and management costs.
What would affect this ETF?The HCM Defender 100 Index ETF (QQH) could benefit from continued advancements in technology and strong performance from its top holdings like Nvidia, Apple, and Microsoft, which are leaders in innovation. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, which can impact growth stocks, and regulatory scrutiny on major tech companies, particularly in the U.S., where the ETF is heavily focused. Economic slowdowns or reduced consumer spending could also negatively affect its exposure to consumer-focused sectors like Consumer Cyclical and Communication Services.

QQH Top 10 Holdings

QQH is essentially a U.S. Big Tech and AI story, with Nvidia, Apple, Microsoft, Broadcom, Amazon, and Meta doing most of the heavy lifting. Broadcom and Nvidia are the clear engines here, riding the AI wave, while Amazon and Alphabet add steady, growth-focused support. Apple has been rising again, helping rather than hurting. On the flip side, Microsoft’s recent wobble and Tesla’s lagging share price are putting a small drag on returns. Overall, the fund is heavily tilted toward U.S. mega-cap tech and communication services, with little exposure beyond that theme.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
19.64%$138.42M
Nvidia8.96%$63.17M$4.82T74.38%
76
Outperform
Apple8.09%$57.02M$4.06T39.19%
79
Outperform
Microsoft5.99%$42.21M$3.07T-5.17%
79
Outperform
Amazon4.72%$33.23M$2.93T45.99%
71
Outperform
Broadcom4.58%$32.27M$1.97T107.50%
76
Outperform
Meta Platforms3.97%$27.98M$1.55T1.86%
76
Outperform
Tesla3.67%$25.85M$1.47T40.05%
73
Outperform
Alphabet Class A2.50%$17.62M$4.62T133.39%
85
Outperform
Alphabet Class C2.49%$17.56M$4.62T131.12%
82
Outperform

QQH Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
73.79
Positive
100DMA
75.42
Positive
200DMA
75.14
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
1.77
Negative
RSI
77.61
Negative
STOCH
93.46
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For QQH, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 75.50, equal to the 50-day MA of 73.79, and equal to the 200-day MA of 75.14, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 1.77 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 77.61 is Negative, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 93.46 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for QQH.

QQH Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$706.44M0.98%
61
Neutral
$785.24M0.18%
74
Outperform
$669.96M0.65%
71
Outperform
$598.48M0.60%
67
Neutral
$459.33M0.29%
66
Neutral
$277.48M0.39%
68
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
QQH
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF
81.50
25.13
44.58%
IETC
iShares Evolved US Technology ETF
GTOP
Goldman Sachs Technology Opportunities ETF
PTF
Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF
PSCT
Invesco S&P SmallCap Information Technology ETF
IDGT
iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement