tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

QDF - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

QDF

FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund (QDF)

Rating:74Outperform
Price Target:
QDF, the FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund, has a solid overall rating, suggesting it holds many financially strong, well-managed companies with reasonable long-term prospects. Top positions like Microsoft and Alphabet boost the fund’s quality by combining strong financial performance with growth in cloud and AI, while Apple and Nvidia add further strength despite richer valuations. The main risk is that several large holdings are concentrated in technology and AI-related businesses, so the fund’s performance is sensitive to that sector, and some holdings like AbbVie introduce concerns around financial stability and leverage.
Positive Factors
Solid Recent Performance
The ETF has shown steady gains over the past month, three months, and year-to-date, indicating positive recent momentum.
Strong Technology Exposure
A large portion of the fund is invested in technology companies, including several top holdings with strong recent performance that have helped drive returns.
Large Asset Base
The fund manages a sizable pool of assets, which can support better trading liquidity and more stable fund operations for investors.
Negative Factors
High Concentration in Top Holdings
A significant share of the portfolio is tied up in a few large positions like Apple, Nvidia, Broadcom, and Microsoft, increasing the impact if any of these stocks struggle.
Mixed Performance Among Key Stocks
Several major holdings, including Apple, Microsoft, AbbVie, and GE Aerospace, have shown weak or negative year-to-date performance, which can drag on overall returns.
Heavy U.S. and Technology Focus
With almost all assets in U.S. stocks and a large tilt toward technology, the fund may be more sensitive to downturns in the U.S. market or tech sector and offers little international diversification.

QDF vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

QDF Summary

FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund (QDF) is an ETF that follows the Northern Trust Quality Dividend Index, focusing on U.S. companies that pay steady dividends and have solid financial health. It holds many well-known names, including Apple and Microsoft, and spreads investments across sectors like technology, financials, and health care. Someone might invest in QDF to seek a mix of income from dividends and long-term growth, while getting broad diversification across the U.S. stock market. A key risk is that it is heavily tilted toward tech stocks, so its value can rise and fall sharply with that sector.
How much will it cost me?The FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund (QDF) has an expense ratio of 0.37%, which means you’ll pay $3.70 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than average for passively managed ETFs because it uses a specialized strategy to focus on high-quality dividend-paying companies with strong fundamentals.
What would affect this ETF?QDF's focus on high-quality dividend-paying companies, particularly in the technology sector, positions it well to benefit from continued innovation and growth in tech. However, its heavy reliance on U.S. markets and technology exposure could make it vulnerable to economic downturns, regulatory changes, or sector-specific challenges like slowing demand or increased competition. Broader market trends, such as interest rate fluctuations, could also impact dividend-paying stocks positively or negatively.

QDF Top 10 Holdings

QDF is leaning heavily on U.S. tech, with Apple and Nvidia doing most of the heavy lifting as their shares keep climbing on the back of AI and services growth. Cisco and Alphabet are also rising, giving the fund an extra push from the broader tech and communications space. Broadcom’s performance has been a bit more mixed lately, and Microsoft looks like it’s catching its breath after a strong run, which slightly tempers returns. Outside tech, steady names like Johnson & Johnson help balance this tech-centric, U.S.-focused dividend story.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Apple9.02%$191.66M$4.51T50.72%
79
Outperform
Nvidia6.77%$143.77M$4.96T44.72%
76
Outperform
Broadcom4.16%$88.37M$1.83T56.21%
76
Outperform
Microsoft3.72%$79.14M$3.10T-11.42%
79
Outperform
Cisco Systems3.25%$68.95M$479.44B84.14%
77
Outperform
AbbVie2.79%$59.17M$401.47B19.70%
66
Neutral
Lam Research2.78%$59.09M$379.27B251.22%
77
Outperform
Johnson & Johnson2.67%$56.74M$560.33B50.14%
78
Outperform
Alphabet Class A2.60%$55.20M$4.45T112.19%
85
Outperform
GE Aerospace2.49%$52.98M$342.21B28.31%
72
Outperform

QDF Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Neutral
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
85.33
Positive
100DMA
83.54
Positive
200DMA
81.30
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
0.89
Positive
RSI
52.07
Neutral
STOCH
30.91
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For QDF, the sentiment is Neutral. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 88.32, equal to the 50-day MA of 85.33, and equal to the 200-day MA of 81.30, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of 0.89 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 52.07 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 30.91 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Neutral sentiment for QDF.

QDF Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$2.19B0.39%
74
Outperform
$8.55B0.02%
74
Outperform
$5.72B0.98%
66
Neutral
$5.39B0.25%
75
Outperform
$4.72B0.06%
73
Outperform
$4.50B0.50%
75
Outperform
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
QDF
FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund
87.85
17.54
24.95%
BBUS
JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF
AKRE
Akre Focus ETF
DSI
iShares MSCI KLD 400 Social ETF
VTHR
Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF
QLTY
GMO U.S. Quality ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement