tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

PJFG - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

PJFG

PGIM Jennison Focused Growth ETF (PJFG)

Rating:74Outperform
Price Target:
PJFG’s rating reflects a high-quality growth portfolio led by major tech names like Alphabet and Apple, whose strong financial performance, positive earnings calls, and leadership in AI, cloud, and consumer technology provide a solid foundation for the fund. However, several key holdings such as Nvidia, Meta, and AMD face risks from high valuations and mixed technical signals, which can limit upside and add volatility. The main risk factor is the fund’s heavy concentration in large technology and AI-related companies, making it sensitive to shifts in tech sentiment and valuation.
Positive Factors
Leading Growth Companies at the Top
The ETF’s largest positions include several well-known growth leaders that have shown strong recent gains, which can help support overall returns.
Focused but Still Sector-Diverse
While technology and communication services make up a large share, the fund also holds stocks in consumer, health care, industrials, and other sectors, which helps spread risk across different parts of the economy.
Recent Short-Term Performance Rebound
Despite a weak year-to-date result, the fund has shown a strong bounce over the past month, suggesting improving short-term momentum.
Negative Factors
High Fee for an ETF
The expense ratio is relatively high, which means more of the fund’s returns are eaten up by costs each year.
Heavy Concentration in a Few Big Tech Names
A large portion of the portfolio is tied up in a small group of big technology and internet stocks, increasing the impact if any of these companies struggle.
Several Major Holdings Are Currently Weak
Some of the top positions, including large technology and health care names, have been lagging this year, which has weighed on the fund’s overall performance.

PJFG vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

PJFG Summary

The PGIM Jennison Focused Growth ETF (PJFG) is an actively managed fund that targets fast-growing U.S. companies across the total stock market, with a strong tilt toward technology and communication services. It does not track a specific index, but instead follows a growth theme, picking firms the managers believe can grow sales and profits quickly. Top holdings include well-known names like Nvidia, Alphabet (Google), Amazon, and Apple. Investors might consider PJFG for long-term growth and exposure to leading innovators in one fund. However, it is heavily concentrated in tech-related stocks and can go up and down more than the overall market.
How much will it cost me?The PGIM Jennison Focused Growth ETF (PJFG) has an expense ratio of 0.75%, meaning you’ll pay $7.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because it’s actively managed, with experts selecting stocks to target growth opportunities rather than following a passive index.
What would affect this ETF?The PGIM Jennison Focused Growth ETF (PJFG) could benefit from continued innovation and demand in the technology sector, which makes up nearly half of its portfolio, as well as strong performance from top holdings like Nvidia and Microsoft. However, it may face challenges if interest rates rise, which can negatively impact growth-focused investments, or if global economic conditions weaken, affecting consumer spending and corporate earnings. Regulatory changes targeting major tech companies could also pose risks to the fund's performance.

PJFG Top 10 Holdings

PJFG is leaning heavily on Big Tech and chipmakers, with Nvidia, Apple, Alphabet, and Broadcom forming the core engine of returns, while AMD has recently shifted into high gear and is giving the fund an extra boost. On the flip side, Microsoft and Meta have been losing a bit of altitude, acting as mild brakes rather than outright drags. Despite its global mandate, the top names are dominated by U.S. giants, so investors are effectively betting on American tech-driven growth with a side of health care and industrial strength from Eli Lilly and GE Aerospace.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Nvidia11.44%$15.56M$4.91T17.63%
76
Outperform
Alphabet Class A9.15%$12.45M$4.22T87.38%
85
Outperform
Apple8.83%$12.01M$4.90T58.04%
79
Outperform
Amazon6.12%$8.33M$2.66T9.33%
71
Outperform
Broadcom5.38%$7.32M$1.76T30.88%
76
Outperform
Microsoft4.71%$6.41M$2.93T-22.79%
79
Outperform
Eli Lilly & Co4.69%$6.38M$1.11T52.79%
72
Outperform
GE Aerospace3.77%$5.12M$361.93B32.50%
72
Outperform
Advanced Micro Devices3.73%$5.07M$808.39B215.79%
73
Outperform
Meta Platforms3.63%$4.94M$1.64T-8.27%
76
Outperform

PJFG Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Neutral
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
115.83
Negative
100DMA
109.84
Positive
200DMA
109.97
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
0.42
Positive
RSI
46.36
Neutral
STOCH
45.07
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For PJFG, the sentiment is Neutral. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 115.33, equal to the 50-day MA of 115.83, and equal to the 200-day MA of 109.97, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of 0.42 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 46.36 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 45.07 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Neutral sentiment for PJFG.

PJFG Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$138.17M0.75%
74
Outperform
$816.86M0.55%
71
Outperform
$360.77M0.49%
74
Outperform
$356.43M0.85%
62
Neutral
$303.05M0.41%
73
Outperform
$207.92M0.56%
64
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
PJFG
PGIM Jennison Focused Growth ETF
114.45
9.53
9.08%
RGEF
Rockefeller Global Equity ETF
MFSG
MFS Active Growth ETF
TMFG
Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF
FFOG
Franklin Focused Growth ETF
ATFV
Alger 35 ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement