Education
About Us
Working with TipRanks
Follow Us
KRMA - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Global X Conscious Companies ETF (KRMA)
Rating:75Outperform
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Top Holdings
Several of the ETF's largest positions, like Nvidia and Alphabet, have delivered strong year-to-date performance, boosting overall returns.
Technology Sector Leadership
With significant exposure to the technology sector, the ETF benefits from the strong growth trends in this industry.
Healthy Year-to-Date Performance
The ETF has shown solid year-to-date gains, indicating strong momentum in its portfolio.
Negative Factors
High Geographic Concentration
The ETF is almost entirely focused on U.S. companies, limiting diversification across global markets.
Sector Overweight in Technology
The heavy allocation to technology increases the fund's vulnerability to downturns in this single sector.
Moderate Expense Ratio
The ETF's expense ratio is higher than some low-cost alternatives, which could slightly reduce long-term returns.
KRMA vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM118.64M
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.43%
Beta0.96
IssuerGlobal X
Inception DateJul 11, 2016
Dividend Yield0.83%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedConcinnity Conscious Companies Index GTR Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume120,266
30 Day Avg. Volume84,814
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
51.89Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering142
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
KRMA Summary
The Global X Conscious Companies ETF (KRMA) is an investment fund that focuses on companies committed to sustainable and socially responsible practices. It follows the Concinnity Conscious Companies Index, which includes businesses that prioritize environmental, social, and governance (ESG) principles. Some well-known companies in this ETF are Nvidia and Microsoft. KRMA offers a way to invest in a wide range of industries while supporting ethical business practices, making it appealing for investors who value growth and sustainability. However, new investors should be aware that its performance can fluctuate with the overall market, especially since it has significant exposure to technology stocks.
How much will it cost me?The Global X Conscious Companies ETF (KRMA) has an expense ratio of 0.43%, which means you’ll pay $4.30 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than average for ETFs because it is actively managed to focus on companies with strong ESG practices. The higher cost reflects the additional research and selection involved in maintaining this socially conscious portfolio.
What would affect this ETF?KRMA's focus on companies with strong ESG practices could benefit from growing investor interest in sustainability and ethical investing, especially as regulations and consumer preferences increasingly favor environmentally and socially responsible businesses. However, its heavy exposure to the technology sector and top holdings like Nvidia, Microsoft, and Apple makes it vulnerable to potential downturns in tech, such as rising interest rates or slowing innovation, which could negatively impact performance. Additionally, its U.S.-centric portfolio may face risks tied to domestic economic conditions or regulatory changes.
KRMA Top 10 Holdings
KRMA’s portfolio leans heavily into technology, with names like Nvidia and Microsoft driving the fund’s performance through their focus on AI and cloud innovation, despite some recent mixed signals in their stock momentum. Alphabet has been a bright spot, rising steadily thanks to strong earnings and strategic investments in AI. On the other hand, Apple’s growth has been steady but less dynamic, while Amazon’s short-term weakness has held back gains. With a clear tilt toward U.S.-based tech giants, KRMA’s positioning reflects a bet on innovation and ESG leadership in the digital economy.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nvidia | 6.87% | $8.14M | $4.58T | 34.79% | 76 Outperform | |
| Apple | 5.87% | $6.96M | $4.05T | 5.71% | 79 Outperform | |
| Microsoft | 5.26% | $6.24M | $3.63T | 11.39% | 79 Outperform | |
| Alphabet Class A | 4.43% | $5.25M | $3.80T | 60.58% | 85 Outperform | |
| Amazon | 2.82% | $3.35M | $2.48T | 2.35% | 71 Outperform | |
| Broadcom | 1.83% | $2.17M | $1.66T | 42.74% | 76 Outperform | |
| Meta Platforms | 1.57% | $1.86M | $1.68T | 10.64% | 76 Outperform | |
| Tesla | 1.22% | $1.44M | $1.61T | 6.88% | 73 Outperform | |
| Teradyne | 0.71% | $840.25K | $31.09B | 51.73% | 71 Outperform | |
| Regeneron | 0.70% | $829.14K | $82.37B | 9.35% | 78 Outperform |
KRMA Technical Analysis
Positive
―
Price Trends
43.82
Positive
43.15
Positive
40.75
Positive
Market Momentum
0.26
Negative
62.70
Neutral
92.02
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For KRMA, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 44.29, equal to the 50-day MA of 43.82, and equal to the 200-day MA of 40.75, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.26 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 62.70 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 92.02 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for KRMA.
KRMA Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
KRMA
Global X Conscious Companies ETF
44.92
5.61
14.27%
PLDR
Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF
―
―
―
SYLD
Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF
―
―
―
ABFL
Fcf Us Quality Etf
―
―
―
PFM
Invesco Dividend Achievers ETF
―
―
―
AUSF
Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
Disclaimer
This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents