tiprankstipranks
Trending News
More News >
Advertisement

ISHP - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

ISHP

First Trust Nasdaq Retail ETF (ISHP)

Rating:63Neutral
Price Target:
ISHP, the First Trust Nasdaq Retail ETF, has a solid overall rating driven by strong performers like JD Health International and Kuaishou Technology, which show robust financial results and positive growth outlooks that support the fund’s quality. Other key holdings such as Alibaba and eBay also add strength through revenue growth and strategic initiatives, though concerns around high valuations, bearish technical trends, and cash flow or profitability pressures in several holdings introduce risk. The main risk factor is that many top positions share similar issues of rich valuations and weak short-term momentum, which could make the ETF more sensitive to market pullbacks.
Positive Factors
Strong Top Holdings Performance
Many of the largest positions, especially in Chinese and U.S. names, have shown strong gains so far this year, helping support the ETF’s overall results.
Global Diversification
Holdings spread across the U.S., Asia, Europe, and Australia reduce reliance on any single country’s economy.
Exposure Beyond Traditional Retail
Significant weights in communication services, technology, and industrials give investors access to online platforms and related businesses, not just brick‑and‑mortar retailers.
Negative Factors
Recent Weak Performance
The ETF has delivered weak returns over the past month, three months, and year to date, which may concern investors looking for near‑term strength.
High Expense Ratio
The fund’s fee is relatively high for an ETF, which can eat into long‑term returns compared with lower‑cost alternatives.
Concentrated in Consumer Cyclical and Communication Services
Heavy exposure to economically sensitive consumer and media/online sectors means the fund may be more volatile during economic slowdowns or shifts in consumer spending.

ISHP vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

ISHP Summary

The First Trust Nasdaq Retail ETF (ISHP) is a fund that follows the Nasdaq Retail Index, focusing on companies tied to online shopping and the digital economy. It holds a mix of global retail and e-commerce names, including well-known companies like Alibaba and Walmart. This ETF may appeal to investors who want growth potential from the shift toward online and tech-driven retail, while still getting diversification across many companies and countries. A key risk is that it is heavily focused on the retail and e-commerce sector, so its value can rise or fall sharply with changes in consumer spending and online shopping trends.
How much will it cost me?The First Trust Nasdaq Retail ETF (Ticker: ISHP) has an expense ratio of 0.6%, which means you’ll pay $6 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because the fund is actively managed, focusing on a specific sector and niche within the digital economy. Active management typically involves more research and strategy, which increases costs.
What would affect this ETF?The First Trust Nasdaq Retail ETF (ISHP) could benefit from continued growth in e-commerce and digital retail innovation, as well as advancements in technology that enhance customer experiences and operational efficiency. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, which can impact consumer spending, and potential regulatory changes affecting global retail and technology sectors. Its exposure to diverse industries like consumer cyclical, technology, and communication services provides opportunities but also risks tied to economic conditions and sector-specific trends.

ISHP Top 10 Holdings

ISHP is leaning heavily into global digital retail, with Chinese platform names setting the tone. Alibaba Health, JD Health, and Kuaishou are among the fund’s liveliest engines, rising on solid growth stories even as their charts flash some mixed signals. Baidu is also pulling its weight, helped by AI momentum despite lingering valuation worries. On the steadier side, Walmart and Williams-Sonoma provide a more traditional retail backbone, humming along rather than sprinting. CoStar, by contrast, has been lagging, acting as a small drag in an otherwise upbeat, Asia-tilted retail mix.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Alibaba Health Information Technology2.06%$122.20KHK$110.60B79.17%
63
Neutral
Kuaishou Technology Class B1.97%$116.90KHK$359.64B97.03%
71
Outperform
Meta Platforms1.94%$115.18K$1.69T7.47%
76
Outperform
Alibaba1.92%$113.96K$373.84B69.60%
68
Neutral
KE Holdings Inc. Sponsored ADR Class A1.90%$112.89K$21.40B7.72%
62
Neutral
Baidu1.90%$112.78K$54.98B66.20%
64
Neutral
REA Group Ltd1.85%$109.74KAU$25.20B-14.00%
60
Neutral
1.82%$107.76K
Alphabet Class A1.77%$105.20K$4.06T68.39%
85
Outperform
Williams-Sonoma1.77%$105.09K$24.56B-5.46%
75
Outperform

ISHP Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Negative
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
39.28
Positive
100DMA
40.11
Negative
200DMA
39.33
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
0.03
Positive
RSI
45.69
Neutral
STOCH
48.27
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For ISHP, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 40.00, equal to the 50-day MA of 39.28, and equal to the 200-day MA of 39.33, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of 0.03 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 45.69 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 48.27 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for ISHP.

ISHP Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$5.99M0.60%
$98.85M0.39%
$98.39M0.55%
$96.31M1.00%
$46.73M0.50%
$7.77M0.50%
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
ISHP
First Trust Nasdaq Retail ETF
39.45
2.60
7.06%
VEGI
iShares MSCI Global Agriculture Producers ETF
EVX
VanEck Environmental Services ETF
FFND
Future Fund Active ETF
EBIZ
Global X E-commerce ETF
BUYZ
Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement