Education
About Us
Working with TipRanks
Follow Us
IPAC - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF (IPAC)
Rating:66Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Top Holdings
Several key holdings, such as Sony and SoftBank Group, have shown strong year-to-date performance, supporting the ETF's overall returns.
Low Expense Ratio
The ETF has a very low expense ratio, making it cost-efficient compared to many other funds.
Geographic Diversification in Asia-Pacific
The fund provides exposure to multiple countries in the Asia-Pacific region, reducing reliance on a single economy.
Negative Factors
Heavy Japan Concentration
Over 63% of the ETF's assets are allocated to Japan, increasing vulnerability to economic or market-specific risks in that country.
Underperforming Toyota Holding
Toyota Motor, one of the largest holdings, has shown weak year-to-date performance, which could drag on overall returns.
Limited U.S. and Global Exposure
The ETF has minimal exposure to U.S. and other global markets, which may limit its ability to benefit from broader international growth.
IPAC vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM2.27B
RegionAsia-Pacific
Expense Ratio0.09%
Beta0.84
IssueriShares
Inception DateJun 10, 2014
Dividend Yield4.13%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedMSCI Pacific IMI
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume194,740
30 Day Avg. Volume159,719
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
90.91Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering1340
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
IPAC Summary
The iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF (IPAC) is an investment fund that focuses on stocks from developed countries in the Pacific region, including Japan, Australia, Hong Kong, New Zealand, and Singapore. It follows the MSCI Pacific Investable Market Index, offering exposure to a wide range of industries like financials, technology, and consumer goods. Some of its top holdings include well-known companies like Toyota Motor and Sony. Investors might consider IPAC for diversification and to benefit from the economic growth of the Pacific region. However, new investors should be aware that the ETF’s performance can be heavily influenced by the economic conditions of Japan, which makes up a significant portion of its holdings.
How much will it cost me?The iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF (IPAC) has an expense ratio of 0.09%, meaning you’ll pay $0.90 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is lower than average because it’s a passively managed fund that tracks an index, which typically costs less than actively managed funds.
What would affect this ETF?The iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF (IPAC) could benefit from economic growth in developed Asia-Pacific countries, particularly if sectors like technology and financials continue to expand. However, challenges such as rising interest rates or geopolitical tensions in the region could negatively impact industries like consumer cyclical and real estate, which are sensitive to economic conditions. Additionally, fluctuations in the performance of top holdings like Toyota and Sony may influence the ETF's overall returns.
IPAC Top 10 Holdings
The iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF (IPAC) leans heavily on financials and industrials, with names like Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group and Hitachi showing steady or rising performance, helping to buoy the fund. However, Sony and SoftBank Group have been lagging, with bearish momentum and mixed financial results holding back gains. The fund’s geographic focus on developed Asia-Pacific markets, particularly Japan and Australia, adds a layer of regional concentration, while its exposure to diverse sectors like technology and consumer cyclical provides balance. Overall, IPAC’s positioning reflects a blend of steady performers and a few names losing steam.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Toyota Motor | 2.48% | $56.50M | ¥47.21T | 27.74% | 80 Outperform | |
| Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group | 2.38% | $54.44M | ¥32.20T | 56.17% | 76 Outperform | |
| Commonwealth Bank of Australia | 1.96% | $44.85M | AU$255.58B | -1.84% | 64 Neutral | |
| BHP Group Ltd | 1.91% | $43.63M | AU$244.34B | 27.85% | 68 Neutral | |
| Hitachi,Ltd. | 1.77% | $40.41M | ¥24.66T | 47.78% | 77 Outperform | |
| Sony | 1.70% | $38.84M | ¥23.51T | 16.13% | 73 Outperform | |
| Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group | 1.46% | $33.29M | ¥21.37T | 46.20% | 77 Outperform | |
| Tokyo Electron | 1.35% | $30.84M | ¥19.38T | 65.46% | 73 Outperform | |
| AIA Group | 1.31% | $29.91M | HK$887.32B | 56.63% | 72 Outperform | |
| Advantest | 1.26% | $28.79M | ¥16.87T | 150.33% | 75 Outperform |
IPAC Technical Analysis
Positive
―
Price Trends
73.01
Positive
72.27
Positive
68.28
Positive
Market Momentum
0.97
Negative
70.48
Negative
87.87
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For IPAC, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 74.35, equal to the 50-day MA of 73.01, and equal to the 200-day MA of 68.28, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.97 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 70.48 is Negative, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 87.87 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for IPAC.
IPAC Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
IPAC
iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF
76.58
18.61
32.10%
INDA
iShares MSCI India ETF
―
―
―
VPL
Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF
―
―
―
MCHI
iShares MSCI China ETF
―
―
―
BBAX
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia ex-Japan ETF
―
―
―
DXJ
WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
Disclaimer
This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents