Education
About Us
Working with TipRanks
Follow Us
GSLC - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSLC)
Rating:74Outperform
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Top Holdings
Several major holdings, like Nvidia, Microsoft, and Alphabet, have delivered strong year-to-date performance, boosting the ETF's returns.
Low Expense Ratio
The ETF has a very low expense ratio, making it cost-effective for investors compared to similar funds.
Sector Diversification
The fund is spread across multiple sectors, with significant exposure to technology, financials, and consumer cyclical industries, reducing reliance on any single sector.
Negative Factors
High Concentration in Technology
Over 35% of the ETF is allocated to technology, making it vulnerable to downturns in this sector.
Limited Geographic Exposure
The ETF is heavily focused on U.S. companies, with minimal exposure to international markets, which could limit diversification.
Recent Short-Term Underperformance
The ETF's one-month performance has been slightly negative, indicating short-term volatility that investors should monitor.
GSLC vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM15.20B
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.09%
Beta0.99
IssuerGoldman Sachs
Inception DateSep 21, 2015
Dividend Yield0.99%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedStuttgart Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Large Cap (USD)
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume303,038
30 Day Avg. Volume336,539
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
156.48Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering434
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
GSLC Summary
The Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSLC) is an investment fund that focuses on large U.S. companies, using a strategy to balance factors like value, momentum, quality, and low volatility. It includes well-known companies such as Apple and Nvidia, giving investors exposure to some of the biggest names in technology and other industries. People might consider investing in GSLC for diversification and potential growth, as it covers a wide range of sectors. However, new investors should know that the ETF’s performance can fluctuate with the overall stock market, especially since it has a significant focus on tech stocks.
How much will it cost me?The Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSLC) has an expense ratio of 0.09%, which means you’ll pay $0.90 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is lower than average because GSLC is passively managed, focusing on tracking a strategy-based index rather than actively picking stocks.
What would affect this ETF?The GSLC ETF, with its strong focus on U.S. large-cap stocks and significant exposure to technology companies like Nvidia, Apple, and Microsoft, could benefit from continued innovation and growth in the tech sector, as well as a stable U.S. economy. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, which can negatively impact high-growth sectors like technology, and broader economic slowdowns or regulatory changes affecting major industries. Its diversified holdings across sectors provide some resilience, but concentration in tech makes it sensitive to sector-specific risks.
GSLC Top 10 Holdings
The GSLC ETF leans heavily into technology, with giants like Nvidia and Apple leading the charge. Nvidia’s focus on AI has kept it in the spotlight, though recent momentum has cooled slightly, while Apple’s steady growth in services and emerging markets adds stability. Microsoft’s mixed signals, driven by cloud and AI growth but tempered by valuation concerns, reflect broader tech sector dynamics. Meanwhile, Alphabet’s bullish performance, fueled by AI and cloud investments, provides a bright spot. With over a third of its portfolio in tech, GSLC’s fortunes are closely tied to this sector’s ups and downs.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nvidia | 7.36% | $1.11B | $4.45T | 34.42% | 76 Outperform | |
| Apple | 6.32% | $954.76M | $3.84T | 9.29% | 79 Outperform | |
| Microsoft | 5.46% | $825.23M | $3.41T | 7.76% | 79 Outperform | |
| Amazon | 3.60% | $543.39M | $2.53T | 5.95% | 71 Outperform | |
| Alphabet Class A | 3.17% | $479.16M | $4.06T | 71.74% | 85 Outperform | |
| Meta Platforms | 2.34% | $353.88M | $1.55T | -0.26% | 76 Outperform | |
| Broadcom | 2.24% | $338.41M | $1.61T | 49.07% | 76 Outperform | |
| Alphabet Class C | 1.33% | $200.98M | $4.06T | 70.73% | 82 Outperform | |
| Tesla | 1.28% | $193.71M | $1.46T | 2.56% | 73 Outperform | |
| JPMorgan Chase | 1.26% | $190.37M | $838.10B | 22.00% | 72 Outperform |
GSLC Technical Analysis
Positive
―
Price Trends
131.72
Positive
130.32
Positive
123.12
Positive
Market Momentum
0.72
Negative
54.53
Neutral
81.03
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For GSLC, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 133.23, equal to the 50-day MA of 131.72, and equal to the 200-day MA of 123.12, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.72 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 54.53 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 81.03 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for GSLC.
GSLC Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
GSLC
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
133.71
18.24
15.80%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
―
―
―
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
―
―
―
SPY
SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
―
―
―
QQQ
Invesco QQQ Trust
―
―
―
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
Disclaimer
This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents