tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

GAMR - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

GAMR

Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF (GAMR)

Rating:68Neutral
Price Target:
GAMR, the Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF, has a solid overall rating driven by large positions in high-quality tech names like Microsoft, Nvidia, and Meta, whose strong financial performance and leadership in AI, cloud, and data centers support the fund’s long-term potential. Tencent and AMD further boost the rating with strong gaming and technology exposure, though risks such as high valuations, some bearish technical signals, and concentration in the tech and gaming sectors can limit upside and add volatility. Weaker spots like Nintendo’s bearish trend and overvaluation, along with leverage and valuation concerns at AppLovin and legal risks at Electronic Arts, slightly hold back the fund’s overall score.
Positive Factors
Leading Gaming and Tech Names
The ETF’s largest positions include well-known technology and gaming companies that have shown strong or steady performance, which can help support the fund’s returns.
Global Gaming Exposure
Holdings across the U.S., Japan, Hong Kong, and Australia give investors access to major video game and digital entertainment markets around the world.
Targeted Industry Focus
A heavy tilt toward communication services and technology stocks provides focused exposure to companies that directly benefit from growth in video games and related digital platforms.
Negative Factors
Recent Weak Overall Performance
The ETF has delivered weak returns so far this year and over the last few months, which may concern investors looking for near-term momentum.
High Concentration in a Few Stocks
A small number of large positions make up a significant share of the portfolio, increasing the impact if any of these companies perform poorly.
Many Top Holdings Are Lagging
Several of the biggest positions have shown weak or negative performance this year, which can drag on the fund despite a few stronger names.

GAMR vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

GAMR Summary

GAMR (Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF) is a fund that follows the VettaFi Video Game Leaders Index, focusing on the global video games and eSports theme. It holds companies involved in making games, gaming hardware, and online platforms, with big names like Microsoft, Nvidia, and Nintendo in the mix. Investors might consider GAMR if they want growth potential from the long-term rise of gaming and to spread their money across many gaming-related companies instead of picking single stocks. A key risk is that it is heavily tied to the gaming and tech sectors, so its price can swing a lot and may drop if this industry falls out of favor.
How much will it cost me?The expense ratio for GAMR is 0.59%, which means you’ll pay $5.90 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because GAMR is actively managed and focuses on a niche sector like video games and eSports, which requires specialized research and expertise.
What would affect this ETF?The GAMR ETF could benefit from continued growth in the video game and eSports industry, driven by advancements in technology like virtual reality and increased global demand for digital entertainment. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, which can impact technology stocks, and regulatory scrutiny in key markets like China, where companies like Tencent have significant exposure. Additionally, economic slowdowns could reduce consumer spending on gaming-related products and services.

GAMR Top 10 Holdings

GAMR is leaning heavily on the gaming hardware and platform backbone, with AMD and Nvidia doing much of the heavy lifting as their shares keep rising on the back of AI and graphics demand. Microsoft is more of a steady hand, but its recent softness means it’s not giving the fund much extra juice. On the flip side, big global gaming names like Tencent, Nintendo, and Sony have been lagging, acting like a weight on returns. Overall, this is a globally diversified but tightly gaming-themed ETF, with a strong tilt toward tech and communication services giants.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Meta Platforms10.94%$4.21M$1.68T-3.07%
76
Outperform
Advanced Micro Devices10.56%$4.06M$893.78B230.55%
73
Outperform
Nvidia9.73%$3.74M$5.13T24.00%
76
Outperform
Tencent Holdings 9.38%$3.61MHK$4.11T-6.00%
75
Outperform
Microsoft9.28%$3.57M$2.86T-21.75%
79
Outperform
Sea6.00%$2.31M$66.94B-30.96%
69
Neutral
Electronic Arts4.79%$1.84M$51.82B38.78%
70
Outperform
Sony4.68%$1.80M¥20.05T-20.53%
73
Outperform
Nintendo Co4.59%$1.76M¥8.13T-50.16%
63
Neutral
AppLovin4.41%$1.70M$150.83B27.35%
74
Outperform

GAMR Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
90.02
Positive
100DMA
84.56
Positive
200DMA
88.19
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
1.35
Negative
RSI
55.92
Neutral
STOCH
64.58
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For GAMR, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 90.99, equal to the 50-day MA of 90.02, and equal to the 200-day MA of 88.19, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 1.35 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 55.92 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 64.58 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for GAMR.

GAMR Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$38.46M0.59%
68
Neutral
$95.64M0.47%
68
Neutral
$62.87M0.50%
53
Neutral
$14.51M0.50%
57
Neutral
$4.71M0.70%
63
Neutral
$4.02M0.49%
56
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
GAMR
Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF
93.01
6.83
7.93%
IBOT
Vaneck Robotics ETF
HERO
Global X Video Games & Esports ETF
NERD
Roundhill BITKRAFT Esports & Digital Entertainment ETF
BNGE
First Trust S-Network Streaming and Gaming ETF
ODDS
Pacer BlueStar Digital Entertainment ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement