FQAL - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Fidelity Quality Factor ETF (FQAL)
Rating:74Outperform
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Large, Established Top Holdings
The ETF’s biggest positions are in well-known, financially strong companies, which can provide a more stable foundation for the portfolio.
Broad Sector Diversification
Holdings spread across technology, financials, health care, industrials, and other sectors help reduce the impact if any one industry struggles.
Low Expense Ratio
The fund’s relatively low annual fee means less of your potential return is lost to costs over time.
Negative Factors
Recent Weak Performance
The ETF has shown weak returns so far this year and over the past month, which may concern investors looking for near-term strength.
Heavy Tilt Toward Technology
A large portion of the fund is invested in technology stocks, which can increase risk if that sector falls out of favor.
U.S.-Only Concentration
With almost all assets in U.S. companies, the fund offers little geographic diversification and is highly tied to the U.S. market’s fortunes.
FQAL vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM1.14B
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.15%
Beta0.94
IssuerFidelity
Inception DateSep 12, 2016
Dividend Yield1.15%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedFidelity U.S. Quality Factor Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume77,038
30 Day Avg. Volume41,339
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
91.34Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering123
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
FQAL Summary
The Fidelity Quality Factor ETF (FQAL) tracks the Fidelity U.S. Quality Factor Index, which focuses on large U.S. companies with strong finances and steady earnings. It holds many well-known names, including Apple, Microsoft, and Nvidia, and spreads investments across sectors like technology, finance, and health care. Someone might consider this ETF if they want long-term growth from financially solid companies while staying diversified across many industries. A key risk is that it leans heavily toward big U.S. tech stocks, so its value can rise and fall sharply with the overall stock market and technology sector.
How much will it cost me?The Fidelity Quality Factor ETF (FQAL) has an expense ratio of 0.16%, meaning you’ll pay $1.60 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is lower than the average for actively managed funds because it follows a passive strategy, tracking the Fidelity U.S. Quality Factor Index to keep costs down.
What would affect this ETF?The Fidelity Quality Factor ETF (FQAL), with its focus on large-cap U.S. stocks and heavy exposure to technology, could benefit from continued innovation and growth in the tech sector, as well as stable economic conditions in North America. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, which could pressure growth-oriented companies, and regulatory changes affecting major tech firms like Nvidia, Apple, and Microsoft. Broader economic slowdowns or sector-specific disruptions could also negatively impact its performance.
FQAL Top 10 Holdings
FQAL is leaning heavily on U.S. mega-cap tech and chip names, with Nvidia, Apple, and Alphabet setting much of the tone. Nvidia and the chip duo Lam Research and Applied Materials are doing the heavy lifting, rising on AI enthusiasm and strong demand. Apple looks steadier, with recent gains offsetting earlier softness, while Alphabet’s mixed stretch still tilts positive. On the flip side, Microsoft has been losing altitude lately, and Eli Lilly’s recent slump isn’t helping. Overall, this is a U.S.-centric, tech-and-AI-driven quality story with a few healthcare and bank anchors.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nvidia | 7.71% | $89.96M | $4.42T | 57.61% | 76 Outperform | |
| Apple | 6.49% | $75.72M | $3.73T | 19.53% | 79 Outperform | |
| Microsoft | 5.30% | $61.85M | $2.97T | 4.14% | 79 Outperform | |
| Alphabet Class A | 5.26% | $61.29M | $3.75T | 93.51% | 85 Outperform | |
| Broadcom | 3.09% | $36.04M | $1.52T | 70.30% | 76 Outperform | |
| Meta Platforms | 2.36% | $27.54M | $1.58T | 6.92% | 76 Outperform | |
| JPMorgan Chase | 1.77% | $20.61M | $773.75B | 22.10% | 72 Outperform | |
| Eli Lilly & Co | 1.68% | $19.54M | $879.01B | 13.11% | 72 Outperform | |
| Johnson & Johnson | 1.43% | $16.69M | $573.82B | 44.97% | 78 Outperform | |
| Visa | 1.38% | $16.11M | $587.93B | -7.86% | 70 Outperform |
FQAL Technical Analysis
Negative
―
Price Trends
76.35
Negative
75.71
Negative
73.45
Positive
Market Momentum
-0.54
Positive
40.51
Neutral
18.23
Positive
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For FQAL, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 76.07, equal to the 50-day MA of 76.35, and equal to the 200-day MA of 73.45, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.54 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 40.51 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 18.23 is Positive, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for FQAL.
FQAL Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
FQAL
Fidelity Quality Factor ETF
73.53
9.54
14.91%
CGUS
Capital Group Core Equity ETF
―
―
―
ONEQ
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
―
―
―
BBUS
JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF
―
―
―
AKRE
Akre Focus ETF
―
―
―
DSI
iShares MSCI KLD 400 Social ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents