tiprankstipranks
Trending News
More News >
Advertisement

FFLV - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

FFLV

Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF (FFLV)

Rating:73Outperform
Price Target:
FFLV’s rating suggests it is a solid large-cap value ETF, supported by strong core holdings like Alphabet, which benefits from powerful growth drivers in AI and cloud, and Merck, which combines robust financial performance with an attractive valuation and a promising drug pipeline. Financial names such as Wells Fargo and Hartford also add to the fund’s quality through strong earnings and strategic growth, though Procter & Gamble’s weaker technical trends and valuation concerns slightly weigh on the overall picture. The main risk is that many top holdings are concentrated in a few sectors like technology, financials, and healthcare, which can expose investors to sector-specific downturns.
Positive Factors
Broad Sector Diversification
The fund spreads its investments across many sectors, which can help reduce the impact if any one industry struggles.
Resilient Defensive Holdings
Top positions in well-known defensive companies in health care and consumer staples have shown steady performance, helping support the fund in choppy markets.
Recent Performance Momentum
The ETF has shown improving returns over the past few months, suggesting recent momentum in its value-focused strategy.
Negative Factors
Heavy U.S. Concentration
With the vast majority of assets in U.S. stocks, the fund offers limited geographic diversification and is highly tied to the U.S. market.
Weakness in Key Financial Holdings
Several of the largest financial stocks in the portfolio have been lagging, which can drag on overall returns given the fund’s sizable exposure to this sector.
Moderate Expense Ratio
The fund’s fee is not especially low for a passive ETF, which slightly reduces the net return investors keep over time.

FFLV vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

FFLV Summary

The Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF (FFLV) is an actively managed fund that focuses on large, established companies that its managers believe are priced cheaply compared with their business strength. It does not track a specific index, but follows a value theme, looking for solid U.S. blue-chip stocks across many sectors like financials, health care, and technology. Well-known holdings include Alphabet (Google’s parent company) and Exxon Mobil. Someone might invest for long-term growth and diversification using steady, mature companies. A key risk is that these value stocks can still fall in price and will go up and down with the overall stock market.
How much will it cost me?The Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF (FFLV) has an expense ratio of 0.38%, which means you’ll pay $3.80 per year for every $1,000 invested. This expense ratio is slightly higher than average for ETFs because it is actively managed, meaning professionals select stocks rather than simply tracking an index.
What would affect this ETF?The Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF (FFLV) could benefit from economic growth and strong performance in sectors like financials, technology, and healthcare, which make up a significant portion of its holdings. However, rising interest rates or regulatory changes could negatively impact financial and energy stocks, while global economic uncertainty might affect the ETF's broad geographic exposure. Investors should also consider how shifts in consumer demand or technological innovation could influence top holdings like Alphabet and Exxon Mobil.

FFLV Top 10 Holdings

FFLV leans into classic value territory, with big U.S. names doing most of the heavy lifting. Alphabet is the clear engine right now, rising on AI and cloud momentum, while Merck and Johnson & Johnson give the fund a healthy dose of steady, defensive growth from the pharma aisle. Exxon Mobil is another bright spot, riding firmer energy trends. On the flip side, financials like Wells Fargo and Bank of America are losing steam, acting as a drag. Overall, it’s a U.S.-heavy mix tilted toward financials, health care, and energy value plays.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Alphabet Class A4.42%$759.99K$3.76T66.82%
85
Outperform
Exxon Mobil4.26%$732.38K$656.02B38.52%
74
Outperform
Wells Fargo2.72%$468.14K$275.09B7.89%
80
Outperform
Bank of America2.55%$437.59K$388.39B11.84%
72
Outperform
Travelers Companies2.35%$404.29K$66.70B24.81%
78
Outperform
Cisco Systems2.32%$399.30K$337.98B15.62%
77
Outperform
Hartford Insurance2.21%$379.34K$39.57B26.71%
78
Outperform
Johnson & Johnson2.09%$358.40K$580.30B56.61%
78
Outperform
Gilead Sciences2.04%$351.33K$193.30B45.86%
78
Outperform
Merck & Company2.02%$347.31K$296.13B43.64%
80
Outperform

FFLV Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
24.96
Positive
100DMA
24.10
Positive
200DMA
23.01
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
0.41
Negative
RSI
62.93
Neutral
STOCH
80.67
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For FFLV, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 25.61, equal to the 50-day MA of 24.96, and equal to the 200-day MA of 23.01, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.41 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 62.93 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 80.67 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for FFLV.

FFLV Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$17.18M0.38%
$95.21M0.95%
$36.63M0.62%
$22.69M0.69%
$13.54M0.44%
$9.82M0.47%
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
FFLV
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF
26.10
4.24
19.40%
RCGE
RockCreek Global Equality ETF
OAKG
Oakmark Global Large Cap ETF
GPT
Intelligent Alpha Atlas ETF
NBGX
Neuberger Berman Growth ETF
JDIV
JPMorgan Dividend Leaders ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement