tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

FFLV - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

FFLV

Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF (FFLV)

Rating:74Outperform
Price Target:
FFLV’s rating reflects a solid, well-balanced portfolio led by high-quality names like Alphabet and TSMC, whose strong financial performance, strategic focus on AI, and positive earnings outlooks support the fund’s overall strength. Other major holdings such as Wells Fargo, Merck, and Travelers add stability through robust profitability and attractive valuations, while positions like Amazon and Exxon Mobil contribute growth but introduce some risk due to premium valuations, cash flow challenges, and sector cyclicality, making concentration in large-cap value and select tech names the main risk factor.
Positive Factors
Solid Recent Performance
The ETF has shown steady gains over the past month, three months, and year-to-date, indicating positive recent momentum.
Strong Leading Holdings
Several of the largest positions, such as Exxon Mobil, Amazon, and Cisco, have delivered strong year-to-date results that support the fund’s overall performance.
Broad Sector Diversification
The fund spreads its investments across many sectors, including financials, technology, industrials, health care, and energy, which helps reduce the impact of weakness in any single industry.
Negative Factors
Moderate Expense Ratio
The fund’s expense ratio is not especially low for a large-cap ETF, which slightly reduces the net return investors keep over time.
Heavy U.S. Concentration
With the vast majority of assets in U.S. companies, the ETF offers limited geographic diversification and is highly tied to the U.S. market.
Weakness in Key Financial Holdings
Some major financial stocks in the top holdings, such as Wells Fargo and Bank of America, have shown weak year-to-date performance, which can drag on the fund given its sizable financial sector exposure.

FFLV vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

FFLV Summary

The Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF (FFLV) invests mainly in large U.S. companies that its managers believe are undervalued but financially solid. It doesn’t track a set index; instead, Fidelity picks stocks based on company fundamentals. The fund holds well-known names like Alphabet (Google’s parent company) and Exxon Mobil, and spreads money across many sectors such as financials, technology, and health care. Someone might invest in FFLV to seek long-term growth and diversification using a value-focused approach. A key risk is that these stocks can still fall in price and move up and down with the overall stock market.
How much will it cost me?The Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF (FFLV) has an expense ratio of 0.38%, which means you’ll pay $3.80 per year for every $1,000 invested. This expense ratio is slightly higher than average for ETFs because it is actively managed, meaning professionals select stocks rather than simply tracking an index.
What would affect this ETF?The Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF (FFLV) could benefit from economic growth and strong performance in sectors like financials, technology, and healthcare, which make up a significant portion of its holdings. However, rising interest rates or regulatory changes could negatively impact financial and energy stocks, while global economic uncertainty might affect the ETF's broad geographic exposure. Investors should also consider how shifts in consumer demand or technological innovation could influence top holdings like Alphabet and Exxon Mobil.

FFLV Top 10 Holdings

FFLV leans heavily on big U.S. value names, with a clear tilt toward financials, tech, and energy. Alphabet and Amazon are doing much of the heavy lifting, with their AI and cloud engines still humming. Cisco and Western Digital are rising fast, giving the fund an extra tech tailwind. On the flip side, Bank of America and Wells Fargo are lagging, acting like sandbags on performance as investors stay cautious on banks. Overall, it’s a globally labeled fund, but the story is dominated by large U.S. blue chips.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Alphabet Class A5.00%$788.70K$4.46T120.85%
85
Outperform
Exxon Mobil3.71%$584.77K$571.22B20.15%
74
Outperform
Western Digital2.58%$407.34K$257.21B1158.61%
77
Outperform
Wells Fargo2.57%$405.89K$251.55B9.02%
80
Outperform
Cisco Systems2.46%$388.36K$471.16B80.25%
77
Outperform
Bank of America2.46%$387.57K$398.83B23.52%
72
Outperform
Amazon2.23%$352.45K$2.63T16.55%
71
Outperform
Travelers Companies2.06%$324.43K$65.45B16.16%
78
Outperform
Merck & Company1.96%$309.26K$281.24B44.03%
80
Outperform
TSMC1.93%$305.10K$1.97T120.57%
81
Outperform

FFLV Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
26.61
Positive
100DMA
26.00
Positive
200DMA
24.77
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
0.27
Negative
RSI
61.41
Neutral
STOCH
68.21
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For FFLV, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 27.10, equal to the 50-day MA of 26.61, and equal to the 200-day MA of 24.77, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.27 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 61.41 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 68.21 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for FFLV.

FFLV Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$15.77M0.38%
74
Outperform
$95.24M0.95%
59
Neutral
$41.79M0.80%
61
Neutral
$34.27M0.35%
69
Neutral
$33.45M0.62%
60
Neutral
$23.64M0.69%
71
Outperform
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
FFLV
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF
27.48
6.07
28.35%
RCGE
RockCreek Global Equality ETF
BCGS
Bancreek Global Select ETF
NTSD
WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund
OAKG
Oakmark Global Large Cap ETF
GPT
Intelligent Alpha Atlas ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement