FDRS - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Founder-Led ETF (FDRS)
Rating:70Outperform
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Growth Leaders at the Top
Several major holdings like Nvidia, CrowdStrike, Arista Networks, Dell, Meta, and BlackRock have shown strong or steady performance, helping support the ETF’s returns.
Focused Technology Exposure
Nearly half of the fund is in technology companies, giving investors concentrated access to a sector with strong long-term growth potential.
Moderate Expense Ratio
The fund’s fee is not extremely low but is reasonable for a specialized strategy, allowing investors to access founder-led companies without very high ongoing costs.
Negative Factors
Heavy Concentration in a Few Stocks
A small number of holdings like Meta, Nvidia, Tesla, and Palantir make up a large share of the portfolio, increasing the impact if any of these companies struggle.
Several Weak Top Holdings
Key positions such as Tesla, Palantir, Oracle, and Shopify have shown weak or lagging performance this year, which has weighed on the fund’s overall results.
Single-Country and Sector Risk
With almost all assets in U.S. stocks and a heavy tilt toward technology and communication services, the ETF is sensitive to downturns in the U.S. market and these specific sectors.
FDRS vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM88.79M
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.49%
Beta1.74
IssuerCorgi
Inception DateDec 29, 2025
Dividend YieldN/A
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedFounder Led Index - Benchmark TR Gross
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume30,632
30 Day Avg. Volume75,764
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
30.25Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering51
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
FDRS Summary
The Founder-Led ETF (FDRS) follows the Founder Led Index, which focuses on 50 large U.S. companies where the original founder is still in a top leadership role. This means you’re investing in businesses driven by the people who started them, often with a strong focus on innovation and long-term growth. The fund is heavily tilted toward technology and communication companies and includes well-known names like Meta Platforms and Nvidia, along with Tesla. Investors might consider FDRS for growth potential and diversification across many founder-led firms. A key risk is that it’s heavily exposed to tech-related stocks, so its value can rise and fall sharply with that sector.
How much will it cost me?This ETF has an expense ratio of 0.49%, which means you’ll pay about $4.90 per year for every $1,000 you invest. That’s higher than the average cost of a simple index ETF because it tracks a more specialized index of founder-led companies, which can be more expensive to run than broad, plain-vanilla index funds.
What would affect this ETF?This ETF is heavily invested in U.S. founder-led technology and communication companies like Nvidia, Meta, and Tesla, so it could benefit if innovation, digital spending, and economic growth remain strong and if interest rates stabilize or fall, which often helps growth-focused businesses. On the other hand, it could be hurt by higher interest rates, tighter tech and data regulations, weaker consumer spending, or a downturn in U.S. markets that would especially affect large, growth-oriented tech and consumer companies.
FDRS Top 10 Holdings
FDRS is essentially a founder-led tech story, with U.S. giants like Nvidia and Meta doing much of the heavy lifting. CrowdStrike has been a standout, rising steadily and giving the fund a strong cybersecurity backbone, while Arista adds a solid, if more measured, boost from the AI networking theme. On the flip side, Tesla is dragging the fund, and software names like Oracle and Salesforce have been losing steam, creating a tug-of-war within the portfolio. Overall, it’s a concentrated bet on visionary U.S. tech leadership, with some notable soft spots.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meta Platforms | 11.13% | $9.88M | $1.59T | -15.21% | 76 Outperform | |
| Nvidia | 10.26% | $9.11M | $5.13T | 20.16% | 76 Outperform | |
| Tesla | 9.51% | $8.45M | $1.40T | 4.71% | 73 Outperform | |
| Palantir Technologies | 5.44% | $4.83M | $298.63B | -20.33% | 74 Outperform | |
| Oracle | 4.30% | $3.81M | $362.48B | -50.57% | 66 Neutral | |
| CrowdStrike Holdings | 3.65% | $3.24M | $191.86B | 58.80% | 67 Neutral | |
| Arista Networks | 3.58% | $3.18M | $220.20B | 54.87% | 83 Outperform | |
| BlackRock | 2.93% | $2.60M | $171.81B | -7.26% | 77 Outperform | |
| Shopify | 2.84% | $2.52M | $153.87B | -8.26% | 77 Outperform | |
| Dell Technologies | 2.76% | $2.45M | $286.41B | 242.30% | 65 Neutral |
FDRS Technical Analysis
Negative
―
Price Trends
23.47
Negative
22.55
Negative
Market Momentum
-0.14
Positive
38.89
Neutral
13.04
Positive
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For FDRS, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 23.27, equal to the 50-day MA of 23.47, and equal to the 200-day MA of ―, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.14 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 38.89 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 13.04 is Positive, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for FDRS.
FDRS Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
FDRS
Founder-Led ETF
22.17
-2.26
-9.25%
BAMD
Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF
―
―
―
BUZZ
VanEck Social Sentiment ETF
―
―
―
SOVF
Sovereign's Capital Flourish Fund
―
―
―
STNC
Stance Equity ESG Large Cap Core ETF
―
―
―
ABLD
Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents