FDIQ - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF (FDIQ)
Rating:72Outperform
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Solid Recent Performance
The ETF has delivered strong gains so far this year and over the past few months, showing positive momentum.
Global Diversification
Holdings spread across the U.S., Europe, and Asia help reduce the impact of weakness in any single country.
Focused Exposure to Financial Data Leaders
The fund concentrates on established financial data and market infrastructure companies, which can benefit from steady demand for financial information and services.
Negative Factors
High Sector Concentration
With most assets in the financial sector, the ETF is vulnerable to downturns affecting financial companies.
Mixed Performance Among Top Holdings
Several of the largest positions have shown weak or negative performance this year, which could drag on future returns if the trend continues.
Moderate Expense Ratio
The fund’s fees are not especially low compared with some broad market ETFs, which slightly reduces net returns over time.
FDIQ vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM52.08M
RegionDeveloped Markets
Expense Ratio0.35%
Beta0.98
IssuerInvesco
Inception DateNov 01, 2011
Dividend Yield2.42%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedBloomberg Financial Data Providers Index - Benchmark TR Gross
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume8,687
30 Day Avg. Volume5,651
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
87.52Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering33
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
FDIQ Summary
The Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF (FDIQ) tracks the Bloomberg Financial Data Providers Index, focusing on companies that run stock exchanges, provide financial data, and offer analytics used by banks and investors. Well-known holdings include S&P Global and Moody’s, which supply credit ratings and market data worldwide. Someone might invest in this ETF to gain growth potential from the rising demand for financial information and to diversify across many leading data and exchange businesses in the U.S. and abroad. A key risk is that it is heavily tied to the financial sector, so it can go up or down with changes in financial markets and regulation.
How much will it cost me?The Invesco KBW Regional Banking ETF (KBWR) has an expense ratio of 0.35%, which means you’ll pay $3.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This expense ratio is slightly higher than average because the fund is focused on a specific niche—regional banks—and requires more active management compared to broad-market index ETFs. It’s a reasonable cost for investors seeking targeted exposure to this sector.
What would affect this ETF?The KBWR ETF, focused on U.S. regional banks, could benefit from economic growth in local communities, increased lending activity, and favorable interest rate environments that boost bank profitability. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, regulatory changes, or economic slowdowns that could impact loan demand and credit quality. Additionally, its heavy reliance on the financial sector makes it vulnerable to sector-specific risks.
FDIQ Top 10 Holdings
FDIQ is essentially a bet on the global plumbing of modern markets, with big positions in exchanges and data giants rather than traditional banks. Deutsche Boerse and Cboe are doing the heavy lifting, with steadily rising share prices that help power the fund. London Stock Exchange, MSCI, and Hong Kong Exchanges are also contributing, though their momentum has been a bit more mixed. On the flip side, Coinbase has been lagging and S&P Global feels like it’s losing steam, slightly dragging on returns. Overall, it’s a developed-markets, finance-data story with no single stock dominating the show.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coinbase Global | 5.03% | $2.61M | $52.75B | -4.18% | 68 Neutral | |
| London Stock Exchange | 5.00% | $2.59M | £49.35B | -12.44% | 70 Outperform | |
| MSCI | 4.76% | $2.46M | $43.15B | 10.48% | 62 Neutral | |
| Experian | 4.73% | $2.45M | £24.60B | -22.22% | 75 Outperform | |
| Deutsche Boerse | 4.64% | $2.41M | €47.96B | -3.54% | 76 Outperform | |
| LPL Financial | 4.59% | $2.38M | $25.70B | 4.74% | 66 Neutral | |
| Moody's | 4.58% | $2.37M | $79.67B | 4.77% | 77 Outperform | |
| Nasdaq | 4.57% | $2.37M | $51.10B | 20.41% | 78 Outperform | |
| Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing | 4.55% | $2.36M | HK$520.85B | 20.49% | 69 Neutral | |
| Cboe Global Markets | 4.51% | $2.34M | $31.82B | 40.65% | 75 Outperform |
FDIQ Technical Analysis
Positive
―
Price Trends
70.53
Positive
67.78
Positive
63.39
Positive
Market Momentum
0.45
Positive
54.69
Neutral
29.41
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For FDIQ, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 70.97, equal to the 50-day MA of 70.53, and equal to the 200-day MA of 63.39, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.45 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 54.69 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 29.41 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for FDIQ.
FDIQ Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
FDIQ
Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF
71.28
17.00
31.32%
AGNG
Global X Aging Population ETF
―
―
―
WCBR
WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund
―
―
―
WISE
Themes Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF
―
―
―
FOWF
Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF
―
―
―
ERET
iShares Environmentally Aware Real Estate ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents