tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

FDIQ - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

FDIQ

Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF (FDIQ)

Rating:72Outperform
Price Target:
FDIQ, the Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF, earns a solid overall rating because many of its largest holdings—like Nasdaq, Moody’s, Deutsche Boerse, and Cboe—show strong financial performance, positive outlooks from earnings calls, and strategic growth initiatives, especially around technology and AI. This strength is partly offset by holdings such as MSCI and Fair Isaac, where high leverage and rich valuations add risk, and by several positions showing bearish or overbought technical signals, highlighting valuation and market-timing risk in a sector that is heavily concentrated in financial data and market infrastructure companies.
Positive Factors
Solid Recent Performance
The ETF has delivered strong gains so far this year and over the past few months, showing positive momentum.
Global Diversification
Holdings spread across the U.S., Europe, and Asia help reduce the impact of weakness in any single country.
Focused Exposure to Financial Data Leaders
The fund concentrates on established financial data and market infrastructure companies, which can benefit from steady demand for financial information and services.
Negative Factors
High Sector Concentration
With most assets in the financial sector, the ETF is vulnerable to downturns affecting financial companies.
Mixed Performance Among Top Holdings
Several of the largest positions have shown weak or negative performance this year, which could drag on future returns if the trend continues.
Moderate Expense Ratio
The fund’s fees are not especially low compared with some broad market ETFs, which slightly reduces net returns over time.

FDIQ vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

FDIQ Summary

The Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF (FDIQ) tracks the Bloomberg Financial Data Providers Index, focusing on companies that run stock exchanges, provide financial data, and offer analytics used by banks and investors. Well-known holdings include S&P Global and Moody’s, which supply credit ratings and market data worldwide. Someone might invest in this ETF to gain growth potential from the rising demand for financial information and to diversify across many leading data and exchange businesses in the U.S. and abroad. A key risk is that it is heavily tied to the financial sector, so it can go up or down with changes in financial markets and regulation.
How much will it cost me?The Invesco KBW Regional Banking ETF (KBWR) has an expense ratio of 0.35%, which means you’ll pay $3.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This expense ratio is slightly higher than average because the fund is focused on a specific niche—regional banks—and requires more active management compared to broad-market index ETFs. It’s a reasonable cost for investors seeking targeted exposure to this sector.
What would affect this ETF?The KBWR ETF, focused on U.S. regional banks, could benefit from economic growth in local communities, increased lending activity, and favorable interest rate environments that boost bank profitability. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, regulatory changes, or economic slowdowns that could impact loan demand and credit quality. Additionally, its heavy reliance on the financial sector makes it vulnerable to sector-specific risks.

FDIQ Top 10 Holdings

This ETF is essentially a who’s who of global market infrastructure, with exchanges and data giants doing most of the heavy lifting. Cboe and Deutsche Boerse have been rising and look like key engines for the fund, while Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing has stayed relatively steady. On the flip side, Coinbase and Experian have been lagging, and Fair Isaac’s choppy performance has added some bumps to the ride. Overall, it’s a financials-heavy, developed-markets mix, leaning hard into stock exchanges, credit data, and index providers rather than traditional banks.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
MSCI5.05%$2.48M$43.27B10.39%
62
Neutral
Fair Isaac5.04%$2.47M$27.49B-33.92%
69
Neutral
Cboe Global Markets4.72%$2.32M$30.97B30.60%
75
Outperform
London Stock Exchange4.66%$2.29M£43.09B-18.42%
70
Outperform
Moody's4.64%$2.28M$77.19B-5.09%
77
Outperform
Nasdaq4.63%$2.28M$49.06B3.96%
78
Outperform
Verisk Analytics4.55%$2.24M$23.85B-40.79%
71
Outperform
Experian4.53%$2.22M£22.30B-32.00%
75
Outperform
Deutsche Boerse4.47%$2.20M€44.31B-8.11%
76
Outperform
S&P Global4.44%$2.18M$122.35B-16.47%
73
Outperform

FDIQ Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
69.95
Negative
100DMA
69.57
Negative
200DMA
65.01
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
-0.68
Positive
RSI
45.81
Neutral
STOCH
44.54
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For FDIQ, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 68.79, equal to the 50-day MA of 69.95, and equal to the 200-day MA of 65.01, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.68 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 45.81 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 44.54 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for FDIQ.

FDIQ Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$49.14M0.35%
72
Outperform
$91.81M0.45%
64
Neutral
$81.28M0.50%
64
Neutral
$33.53M0.35%
59
Neutral
$19.33M0.75%
70
Neutral
$14.93M0.49%
70
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
FDIQ
Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF
68.28
14.43
26.80%
WCBR
WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund
AGNG
Global X Aging Population ETF
WISE
Themes Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF
IVEP
Dan IVES Wedbush AI Power & Infrastructure ETF
FOWF
Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement