FDIQ - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF (FDIQ)
Rating:72Outperform
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Solid Recent Performance
The ETF has shown steady gains over the past three months and year-to-date, indicating improving momentum in regional bank stocks.
Strong Top Holdings
Many of the largest positions, such as Webster Financial, UMB Financial, and Cadence Bank, have delivered strong year-to-date performance, helping support the fund’s returns.
Moderate Expense Ratio
The fund’s expense ratio is reasonable for a specialized sector ETF, allowing investors to gain targeted exposure to regional banks without very high ongoing costs.
Negative Factors
Heavy Sector Concentration
Almost all of the ETF’s assets are in the financial sector, so its performance is highly sensitive to conditions affecting banks and financial companies.
Limited Geographic Diversification
With nearly all holdings in U.S. companies, the fund offers little protection if the U.S. financial system or economy faces stress.
Small Asset Base
The ETF manages a relatively small amount of assets, which can sometimes lead to wider trading spreads and a higher risk that the fund could be closed in the future.
FDIQ vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM50.71M
RegionDeveloped Markets
Expense Ratio0.35%
Beta0.98
IssuerInvesco
Inception DateNov 01, 2011
Dividend Yield2.48%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedBloomberg Financial Data Providers Index - Benchmark TR Gross
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume4,762
30 Day Avg. Volume5,750
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
87.73Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering31
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
FDIQ Summary
The Invesco KBW Regional Banking ETF (KBWR) tracks the KBW Nasdaq Regional Banking Index, focusing on U.S. regional banks rather than big national giants. It holds a basket of local and mid-sized banks such as Webster Financial and Wintrust Financial, which lend to households and small businesses across different parts of the country. Someone might invest in KBWR to get diversified exposure to many regional banks in a single investment, potentially benefiting from growth in local economies. A key risk is that it is heavily concentrated in bank stocks, so it can be hit hard by interest rate changes and financial sector downturns.
How much will it cost me?The Invesco KBW Regional Banking ETF (KBWR) has an expense ratio of 0.35%, which means you’ll pay $3.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This expense ratio is slightly higher than average because the fund is focused on a specific niche—regional banks—and requires more active management compared to broad-market index ETFs. It’s a reasonable cost for investors seeking targeted exposure to this sector.
What would affect this ETF?The KBWR ETF, focused on U.S. regional banks, could benefit from economic growth in local communities, increased lending activity, and favorable interest rate environments that boost bank profitability. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, regulatory changes, or economic slowdowns that could impact loan demand and credit quality. Additionally, its heavy reliance on the financial sector makes it vulnerable to sector-specific risks.
FDIQ Top 10 Holdings
This ETF is tightly focused on financial data and exchanges, with global heavyweights like CME Group, Deutsche Boerse, and Cboe setting much of the tone. Deutsche Boerse has been a clear bright spot lately, while CME and Cboe have been generally rising despite some short-term wobbling. On the other side, names like Moody’s, Nasdaq, and Verisk are losing steam, acting as a drag on recent returns. With holdings spread across the U.S., Europe, and Asia, the fund is globally diversified by geography but firmly concentrated in the financial infrastructure theme.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CME Group | 5.62% | $2.75M | $106.49B | 13.10% | 74 Outperform | |
| Deutsche Boerse | 5.50% | $2.69M | €45.10B | -8.35% | 76 Outperform | |
| Cboe Global Markets | 5.39% | $2.63M | $29.34B | 24.86% | 75 Outperform | |
| Intercontinental Exchange | 4.92% | $2.41M | $89.77B | -7.25% | 80 Outperform | |
| MSCI | 4.77% | $2.33M | $39.26B | -6.78% | 62 Neutral | |
| Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing | 4.75% | $2.32M | HK$506.68B | 10.48% | 69 Neutral | |
| London Stock Exchange | 4.73% | $2.31M | £43.76B | -24.76% | 70 Outperform | |
| Moody's | 4.39% | $2.15M | $77.80B | -6.82% | 77 Outperform | |
| Nasdaq | 4.35% | $2.12M | $48.40B | 8.75% | 78 Outperform | |
| Verisk Analytics | 4.26% | $2.08M | $25.31B | -38.77% | 71 Outperform |
FDIQ Technical Analysis
Positive
―
Price Trends
69.18
Positive
65.33
Positive
62.06
Positive
Market Momentum
-0.47
Positive
51.22
Neutral
60.20
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For FDIQ, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 69.62, equal to the 50-day MA of 69.18, and equal to the 200-day MA of 62.06, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.47 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 51.22 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 60.20 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for FDIQ.
FDIQ Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
FDIQ
Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF
69.38
21.85
45.97%
JEDI
Defiance Drone and Modern Warfare ETF
―
―
―
AGNG
Global X Aging Population ETF
―
―
―
WCBR
WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund
―
―
―
WISE
Themes Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF
―
―
―
FOWF
Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents