CIBR - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR)
Rating:71Outperform
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Core Cybersecurity Leaders
Several major holdings like Broadcom, Cisco, Fortinet, Cloudflare, F5, and Akamai have shown strong year-to-date performance, helping support the fund despite recent volatility.
Focused Exposure to Cybersecurity Theme
The ETF is heavily invested in cybersecurity-related technology companies, giving investors targeted access to a growing and important area of the tech sector.
Large Asset Base
With a sizable level of assets under management, the fund appears well-established and likely benefits from good trading liquidity for investors.
Negative Factors
High Concentration in Top Holdings
A small group of stocks makes up a large portion of the portfolio, which increases the impact that any one company’s performance can have on the fund.
Mixed Recent Performance
The ETF’s year-to-date and three-month returns have been weak, reflecting recent pressure in parts of the cybersecurity and technology space.
Higher Expense Ratio
The fund’s expense ratio is on the higher side for an ETF, which means more of the returns are used to cover fees instead of staying with investors.
CIBR vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM12.59B
RegionGlobal
Expense Ratio0.58%
Beta1.14
IssuerFirst Trust
Inception DateJul 06, 2015
Dividend Yield0.46%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedNasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume1,754,873
30 Day Avg. Volume1,632,297
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
89.73Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering42
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
CIBR Summary
CIBR is the First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF, which follows the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. It focuses on companies that help protect computers, networks, and data from hackers and cyberattacks. Most of its holdings are U.S. tech firms, including well-known names like Broadcom and Cisco Systems, along with leading cybersecurity specialists such as CrowdStrike and Palo Alto Networks. An investor might choose CIBR to tap into the long-term growth of cybersecurity as the world becomes more digital. However, it is heavily focused on technology stocks, so its price can be quite volatile and may drop sharply if tech stocks fall.
How much will it cost me?The First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) has an expense ratio of 0.59%, meaning you’ll pay $5.90 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because it is actively managed and focuses on a specialized sector like cybersecurity, which requires more research and expertise.
What would affect this ETF?The First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) could benefit from the growing demand for cybersecurity solutions as businesses and governments increasingly prioritize digital security amid rising cyber threats and regulatory requirements. However, the ETF may face challenges if technology sector growth slows due to economic uncertainty or if stricter regulations impact the profitability of its top holdings like CrowdStrike and Palo Alto Networks. Global exposure also means it could be affected by geopolitical tensions or differing regional policies on cybersecurity.
CIBR Top 10 Holdings
CIBR is riding a powerful cybersecurity wave, with heavyweights like CrowdStrike and Palo Alto Networks doing most of the heavy lifting as their shares keep rising on strong growth and upbeat earnings. Fortinet and Datadog are also sprinting ahead, adding extra fuel to the fund’s momentum. Broadcom, tied more to semiconductors, has been steadier, while Zscaler looks a bit winded, lagging despite solid revenue trends. Overall, this is a tech-heavy, security-first, mostly global fund, but its fate is closely tied to a handful of U.S.-listed cyber leaders.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrowdStrike Holdings | 9.72% | $1.10B | $170.79B | 55.08% | 67 Neutral | |
| Palo Alto Networks | 9.58% | $1.08B | $210.34B | 46.39% | 73 Outperform | |
| Broadcom | 8.68% | $982.72M | $2.02T | 84.56% | 76 Outperform | |
| Fortinet | 8.68% | $982.43M | $95.02B | 35.56% | 71 Outperform | |
| Cisco Systems | 8.27% | $935.84M | $467.61B | 91.02% | 77 Outperform | |
| Akamai | 4.03% | $456.51M | $20.81B | 96.94% | 73 Outperform | |
| Cloudflare | 3.59% | $406.22M | $80.63B | 45.77% | 61 Neutral | |
| Zscaler | 3.20% | $362.29M | $21.03B | -49.32% | 60 Neutral | |
| F5, Inc. | 3.19% | $360.82M | $21.63B | 34.36% | 74 Outperform | |
| Datadog | 2.95% | $334.37M | $80.18B | 109.83% | 69 Neutral |
CIBR Technical Analysis
Positive
―
Price Trends
70.09
Positive
68.79
Positive
71.52
Positive
Market Momentum
4.62
Negative
80.53
Negative
82.70
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For CIBR, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 78.01, equal to the 50-day MA of 70.09, and equal to the 200-day MA of 71.52, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 4.62 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 80.53 is Negative, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 82.70 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for CIBR.
CIBR Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
CIBR
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
89.04
16.90
23.43%
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
―
―
―
GRID
First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index
―
―
―
IGF
iShares Global Infrastructure ETF
―
―
―
HACK
Etfmg Prime Cyber Security Etf
―
―
―
BUG
Global X Cybersecurity Etf
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents