tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

BLCK - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

BLCK

Corgi Crypto Infrastructure ETF (BLCK)

Rating:52Neutral
Price Target:
BLCK’s rating reflects a mix of strong, established crypto infrastructure players and more financially challenged names. High-quality holdings like CME Group, with resilient financial performance and growth in crypto trading, and Coinbase, with solid expansion efforts, help support the fund’s overall quality, while Robinhood and Figure add further growth potential despite some valuation and cash flow concerns. On the downside, weaker holdings such as TeraWulf, which faces significant profitability and leverage issues, and other miners with cash flow and liquidity risks, introduce volatility, and the fund’s focus on crypto-related businesses is the main risk factor due to sector concentration.
Positive Factors
Strong Crypto-Linked Winners
Several top holdings tied to crypto mining and infrastructure have shown strong gains this year, helping offset weaker names in the portfolio.
Focused Exposure to Crypto Infrastructure
The fund concentrates on companies directly involved in crypto trading, mining, and related services, giving investors targeted access to this niche area.
Moderate Expense Ratio
The ETF charges a mid-range fee for a specialized strategy, which is reasonable given its narrow focus on crypto infrastructure companies.
Negative Factors
Recent Weak Overall Performance
The ETF has delivered negative returns so far this year and over the past month, showing that it has struggled in the recent market environment.
Heavy Sector Concentration
With most assets in financial and technology stocks tied to crypto, the fund is highly sensitive to downturns in this single theme.
High U.S. and Single-Theme Exposure
The portfolio is dominated by U.S.-listed crypto-related companies, offering limited geographic and industry diversification if the crypto sector falls out of favor.

BLCK vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

BLCK Summary

BLCK is the Corgi Crypto Infrastructure ETF, an actively managed fund focused on companies that build and run the technology behind cryptocurrencies and blockchain, rather than holding coins directly. It follows a blockchain infrastructure theme and invests mainly in U.S. financial and tech firms tied to digital-asset trading, mining, storage, and security. Well-known holdings include Coinbase and CME Group. Someone might invest for potential long-term growth as blockchain use expands, while getting diversification across many related companies. A key risk is that it can be very volatile and may rise or fall sharply with the crypto and tech markets.
How much will it cost me?This ETF has an expense ratio of 0.35%, which means you’ll pay about $3.50 per year for every $1,000 you invest. That’s a bit higher than the cost of a typical broad, passively managed index ETF, mainly because this is an actively managed, specialized blockchain and crypto-infrastructure fund that requires more research and trading by its managers.
What would affect this ETF?BLCK could benefit if global interest in blockchain and digital assets grows, leading to more trading on platforms like Coinbase, greater use of crypto payment and custody services, and stronger demand for miners and data centers across its global financial and technology holdings. On the other hand, it may be hurt by stricter crypto regulations, sharp drops in digital asset prices, higher energy or operating costs for miners, or a broader downturn in financial and tech markets that reduces activity and investment in the crypto ecosystem.

BLCK Top 10 Holdings

BLCK is essentially a leveraged bet on the crypto plumbing, with U.S.-listed trading platforms and miners in the driver’s seat. Robinhood has been a bright spot, helping offset the recent slide in Coinbase, which has been losing steam and weighing on returns. On the mining side, names like Riot Platforms and Hut 8 have shown mixed but generally rising momentum over the past few months, while TeraWulf and IREN are more volatile and currently lagging. Overall, the fund is heavily tilted toward financial and crypto-infrastructure plays, with global blockchain exposure but a clear U.S. listing bias.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Coinbase Global7.74%$34.92K$42.18B-56.70%
68
Neutral
Hut 85.74%$25.89K$9.93B415.39%
CME Group5.07%$22.88K$95.45B-3.97%
74
Outperform
Cipher Mining5.00%$22.54K$7.24B314.93%
56
Neutral
Riot Platforms4.82%$21.75K$6.90B64.95%
68
Neutral
Circle Internet Group, Inc. Class A4.73%$21.35K$15.25B-65.00%
64
Neutral
Robinhood4.36%$19.67K$80.97B-15.96%
68
Neutral
BitMine Immersion Technologies4.28%$19.33K$10.01B-47.81%
MARA Holdings3.71%$16.75K$3.83B-26.49%
64
Neutral
Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. Class A3.71%$16.75K$5.51B
68
Neutral

BLCK Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Negative
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
25.08
Negative
100DMA
200DMA
Market Momentum
MACD
RSI
STOCH
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For BLCK, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 23.20, equal to the 50-day MA of 25.08, and equal to the 200-day MA of ―, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of ― indicates undefined momentum. The RSI at ― is undefined, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of ― is undefined, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for BLCK.

BLCK Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$457.07K0.35%
52
Neutral
$98.18M1.00%
66
Neutral
$96.15M0.50%
71
Outperform
$73.80M0.90%
63
Neutral
$23.25M0.85%
65
Neutral
$18.41M0.65%
63
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
BLCK
Corgi Crypto Infrastructure ETF
22.18
-4.88
-18.03%
FFND
Future Fund Active ETF
FDCF
Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF
HECO
SPDR Galaxy Hedged Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF
BCDF
Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF
DECO
SPDR Galaxy Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement