Education
About Us
Working with TipRanks
Follow Us
BJK - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
VanEck Gaming ETF (BJK)
Rating:62Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Global Exposure
The ETF invests in companies across multiple countries, providing geographic diversification.
Strong Sector Focus
With significant exposure to the Consumer Cyclical sector, the fund targets industries with growth potential tied to economic trends.
Healthy Top Performer
Some holdings, like Wynn Resorts and Galaxy Entertainment Group, have delivered strong year-to-date performance, supporting the fund's returns.
Negative Factors
High Expense Ratio
The ETF charges a relatively high fee compared to many other funds, which can eat into investor returns over time.
Lagging Key Holdings
Several top holdings, including Flutter Entertainment and Evolution Gaming Group, have underperformed year-to-date, dragging on overall performance.
Sector Concentration Risk
The fund is heavily concentrated in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making it vulnerable to downturns in this specific industry.
BJK vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM23.04M
RegionGlobal
Expense Ratio0.67%
Beta0.88
IssuerVanEck
Inception DateJan 22, 2008
Dividend Yield2.78%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedMVIS Global Gaming
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume1,147
30 Day Avg. Volume2,562
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
49.58Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering30
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
BJK Summary
The VanEck Gaming ETF (Ticker: BJK) is an investment fund that focuses on the global gaming and casino industry, following the MVIS Global Gaming index. It includes companies involved in casino operations, online gaming, sports betting, and gaming technology. Some well-known companies in this ETF are Las Vegas Sands and DraftKings. Investors might consider BJK if they are interested in the growth potential of the entertainment and gaming sector, which is driven by increasing consumer demand and technological advancements. However, new investors should be aware that this ETF is heavily tied to the gaming industry, meaning its performance can be affected by changes in consumer spending or regulations impacting this sector.
How much will it cost me?The VanEck Gaming ETF (Ticker: BJK) has an expense ratio of 0.67%, meaning you’ll pay $6.70 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because it is actively managed to focus on a specialized niche within the gaming and leisure industry.
What would affect this ETF?The VanEck Gaming ETF could benefit from growing consumer demand for entertainment and leisure activities, particularly in casinos, online gaming, and sports betting, as well as advancements in gaming technology. However, it may face challenges from regulatory changes in key markets, economic downturns that reduce discretionary spending, or rising interest rates that could impact companies in the consumer cyclical and real estate sectors. Its global exposure and focus on industry leaders like Aristocrat Leisure and Flutter Entertainment provide opportunities for growth but also make it sensitive to international economic and political conditions.
BJK Top 10 Holdings
The VanEck Gaming ETF is a global play on the dynamic gaming and leisure industry, but recent performance has been a mixed bag. Las Vegas Sands and Wynn Resorts are steady performers, buoyed by strong earnings and strategic developments, while Galaxy Entertainment is rising on robust revenue growth. However, Aristocrat Leisure and Flutter Entertainment are lagging, weighed down by bearish momentum and profitability challenges. The fund leans heavily into the consumer discretionary sector, with a notable focus on casinos and gaming, making it a concentrated bet on the entertainment industry's evolving trends.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Las Vegas Sands | 8.10% | $1.87M | $44.92B | 22.08% | 74 Outperform | |
| Aristocrat Leisure | 7.40% | $1.71M | AU$35.78B | -15.76% | 67 Neutral | |
| Flutter Entertainment PLC | 6.57% | $1.52M | £28.28B | -25.99% | 57 Neutral | |
| VICI Properties | 6.50% | $1.50M | $29.67B | -11.34% | 73 Outperform | |
| Galaxy Entertainment Group | 5.79% | $1.34M | HK$172.90B | 6.45% | 72 Outperform | |
| DraftKings | 5.51% | $1.27M | $31.12B | -16.85% | 59 Neutral | |
| Wynn Resorts | 5.04% | $1.16M | $12.92B | 29.82% | 62 Neutral | |
| Churchill Downs | 4.38% | $1.01M | $7.95B | -16.92% | 73 Outperform | |
| Evolution Gaming Group AB | 4.38% | $1.01M | kr130.32B | -34.96% | 72 Outperform | |
| Gaming and Leisure | 4.29% | $988.78K | $11.70B | -15.56% | 72 Outperform |
BJK Technical Analysis
Positive
―
Price Trends
41.81
Positive
43.68
Negative
41.75
Positive
Market Momentum
0.08
Negative
54.01
Neutral
35.46
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For BJK, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 41.35, equal to the 50-day MA of 41.81, and equal to the 200-day MA of 41.75, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.08 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 54.01 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 35.46 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for BJK.
BJK Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
BJK
VanEck Gaming ETF
42.00
-1.16
-2.69%
IBLC
iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF
―
―
―
EVX
VanEck Environmental Services ETF
―
―
―
ONLN
ProShares Online Retail ETF
―
―
―
BETZ
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF
―
―
―
AWAY
ETFMG Travel Tech ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
Disclaimer
This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents