tiprankstipranks
Trending News
More News >
Advertisement

BJK - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

BJK

VanEck Gaming ETF (BJK)

Rating:60Neutral
Price Target:
BJK, the VanEck Gaming ETF, has a solid but not top-tier rating, reflecting a mix of strong gaming and casino operators alongside some more challenged names. Higher-quality holdings like Las Vegas Sands, VICI Properties, Galaxy Entertainment, and Churchill Downs support the fund with robust financial performance, positive earnings commentary, and generally attractive valuations. However, weaker contributors such as DraftKings and Flutter Entertainment, which face profitability issues, high leverage, and regulatory or tax risks, along with the fund’s concentrated exposure to the global gaming and casino industry, add meaningful risk and help explain why the rating is not higher.
Positive Factors
Global Exposure
The ETF invests in companies across multiple countries, providing geographic diversification.
Strong Sector Focus
With significant exposure to the Consumer Cyclical sector, the fund targets industries with growth potential tied to economic trends.
Healthy Top Performer
Some holdings, like Wynn Resorts and Galaxy Entertainment Group, have delivered strong year-to-date performance, supporting the fund's returns.
Negative Factors
High Expense Ratio
The ETF charges a relatively high fee compared to many other funds, which can eat into investor returns over time.
Lagging Key Holdings
Several top holdings, including Flutter Entertainment and Evolution Gaming Group, have underperformed year-to-date, dragging on overall performance.
Sector Concentration Risk
The fund is heavily concentrated in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making it vulnerable to downturns in this specific industry.

BJK vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

BJK Summary

The VanEck Gaming ETF (Ticker: BJK) is an investment fund that focuses on the global gaming and casino industry, following the MVIS Global Gaming index. It includes companies involved in casino operations, online gaming, sports betting, and gaming technology. Some well-known companies in this ETF are Las Vegas Sands and DraftKings. Investors might consider BJK if they are interested in the growth potential of the entertainment and gaming sector, which is driven by increasing consumer demand and technological advancements. However, new investors should be aware that this ETF is heavily tied to the gaming industry, meaning its performance can be affected by changes in consumer spending or regulations impacting this sector.
How much will it cost me?The VanEck Gaming ETF (Ticker: BJK) has an expense ratio of 0.67%, meaning you’ll pay $6.70 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because it is actively managed to focus on a specialized niche within the gaming and leisure industry.
What would affect this ETF?The VanEck Gaming ETF could benefit from growing consumer demand for entertainment and leisure activities, particularly in casinos, online gaming, and sports betting, as well as advancements in gaming technology. However, it may face challenges from regulatory changes in key markets, economic downturns that reduce discretionary spending, or rising interest rates that could impact companies in the consumer cyclical and real estate sectors. Its global exposure and focus on industry leaders like Aristocrat Leisure and Flutter Entertainment provide opportunities for growth but also make it sensitive to international economic and political conditions.

BJK Top 10 Holdings

The VanEck Gaming ETF is a global bet on the entertainment and leisure sector, with a heavy focus on casinos and gaming. Wynn Resorts is rising on improved profitability and bullish sentiment, while Las Vegas Sands adds steady momentum with strong earnings. However, Flutter Entertainment and DraftKings are lagging, weighed down by profitability issues and bearish technical signals. The fund leans heavily into consumer cyclical stocks, with a notable presence in real estate through VICI Properties. Overall, this ETF captures the highs and lows of a dynamic industry driven by global demand for gaming.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Aristocrat Leisure 8.09%$1.79MAU$35.18B-11.49%
67
Neutral
Flutter Entertainment PLC7.98%$1.76M£26.95B-30.20%
54
Neutral
VICI Properties7.08%$1.56M$29.81B-4.00%
73
Outperform
DraftKings6.67%$1.47M$31.14B-14.88%
59
Neutral
Galaxy Entertainment Group5.54%$1.22MHK$169.31B19.16%
72
Outperform
Las Vegas Sands5.38%$1.19M$40.49B33.09%
74
Outperform
Gaming and Leisure5.37%$1.19M$12.73B-3.92%
72
Outperform
Evolution Gaming Group AB4.55%$1.00Mkr126.85B-28.37%
72
Outperform
Wynn Resorts4.34%$957.96K$12.15B42.84%
62
Neutral
Churchill Downs3.96%$873.71K$7.40B-18.20%
73
Outperform

BJK Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Negative
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
40.25
Negative
100DMA
41.61
Negative
200DMA
40.59
Negative
Market Momentum
MACD
-0.13
Positive
RSI
36.51
Neutral
STOCH
22.30
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For BJK, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 40.62, equal to the 50-day MA of 40.25, and equal to the 200-day MA of 40.59, indicating a bearish trend. The MACD of -0.13 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 36.51 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 22.30 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for BJK.

BJK Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$22.08M0.67%
$95.91M1.00%
$94.38M0.55%
$78.88M0.58%
$60.16M0.75%
$32.75M0.75%
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
BJK
VanEck Gaming ETF
39.58
0.83
2.14%
FFND
Future Fund Active ETF
EVX
VanEck Environmental Services ETF
ONLN
ProShares Online Retail ETF
BETZ
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF
AWAY
ETFMG Travel Tech ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement