Education
About Us
Working with TipRanks
Follow Us
AAUM - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Tema Alternative Asset Managers ETF (AAUM)
Rating:63Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Performance
The ETF has shown steady gains over the past month and quarter, suggesting positive short-term momentum.
Leading Alternative Asset Manager Holdings
Several of the largest positions, such as Hamilton Lane and StepStone Group, have delivered strong year-to-date results, helping support the fund’s overall performance.
Global Diversification
Holdings spread across the U.S., U.K., Canada, and several European countries help reduce the impact of weakness in any single market.
Negative Factors
High Expense Ratio
The fund’s relatively high fee means more of the returns go to costs compared with lower-cost ETFs.
Heavy Sector Concentration
With most assets in financial companies, the ETF is highly sensitive to conditions in the financial sector and alternative asset management industry.
Mixed Performance Among Top Holdings
Some major positions, including TPG, Apollo Global Management, and Brookfield, have shown weaker year-to-date performance, which can drag on overall returns.
AAUM vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM2.23M
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.75%
Beta1.22
IssuerTema
Inception DateOct 01, 2025
Dividend YieldN/A
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedNo Underlying Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume932
30 Day Avg. Volume249
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
29.91Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering30
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
AAUM Summary
The Tema Alternative Asset Managers ETF (AAUM) is an actively managed fund that focuses on companies in the asset management and custody banking space, mainly within the financial sector. It doesn’t track a set index, but instead picks a mix of firms from the U.S. and other developed markets. Well-known holdings include Blackstone and Apollo Global Management. Someone might invest in AAUM to get targeted exposure to leading investment and private equity firms, adding diversification beyond regular bank stocks. A key risk is that it is heavily tied to financial markets, so its value can rise and fall sharply with market conditions.
How much will it cost me?The Tema Alternative Asset Managers ETF (AAUM) has an expense ratio of 0.75%, which means you’ll pay $7.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than the average for ETFs because it is actively managed, allowing the fund to adapt to market changes and focus on specific opportunities in the asset management sector.
What would affect this ETF?The AAUM ETF, focused on U.S. asset management and custody banks, could benefit from positive trends like increased demand for financial services and innovation in asset management technologies. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, which can pressure financial sector profitability, or regulatory changes that impact asset management firms. Its concentrated exposure to the financial sector makes it sensitive to broader economic conditions and market volatility.
AAUM Top 10 Holdings
AAUM is essentially a who’s who of private markets, with Hamilton Lane and StepStone doing much of the heavy lifting as their shares have been rising and adding some welcome momentum. Partners Group is also pulling its weight, staying on a solid upward path. On the flip side, Apollo and TPG have been more mixed lately, occasionally putting a brake on overall returns, while Ares looks steady but not spectacular. The fund is tightly focused on U.S.-centric alternative asset managers, with only a light global flavor from names like EQT and Partners Group.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brookfield Corporation | 5.80% | $129.14K | $118.12B | 17.67% | 65 Neutral | |
| Apollo Global Management | 5.32% | $118.47K | $72.59B | -23.18% | 75 Outperform | |
| Hamilton Lane | 5.31% | $118.16K | $6.85B | -21.40% | 77 Outperform | |
| Partners Group Holding AG | 5.15% | $114.69K | CHF24.56B | -33.26% | 66 Neutral | |
| Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. Class A | 5.11% | $113.78K | C$117.44B | -15.43% | 68 Neutral | |
| Ares Management | 5.05% | $112.38K | $43.76B | -28.09% | 70 Outperform | |
| EQT AB | 5.04% | $112.27K | kr341.50B | -21.12% | 68 Neutral | |
| KKR & Co | 4.93% | $109.82K | $90.69B | -27.62% | 69 Neutral | |
| Carlyle Group | 4.93% | $109.66K | $19.64B | 5.25% | 59 Neutral | |
| StepStone Group | 4.86% | $108.11K | $6.76B | -9.14% | 45 Neutral |
AAUM Technical Analysis
Negative
―
Price Trends
24.36
Negative
Market Momentum
-0.62
Positive
36.41
Neutral
21.54
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For AAUM, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 23.82, equal to the 50-day MA of 24.36, and equal to the 200-day MA of ―, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.62 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 36.41 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 21.54 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for AAUM.
AAUM Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
AAUM
Tema Alternative Asset Managers ETF
22.43
-2.05
-8.37%
LFGY
YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF
―
―
―
GABF
Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF
―
―
―
FBDC
FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF
―
―
―
TFNS
T. Rowe Price Financials ETF
―
―
―
LBO
WHITEWOLF Publicly Listed Private Equity ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
Disclaimer
This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents