Mammoth Energy Services (TUSK) AI Stock Analysis

• Market Cap: $88.68M
• Dividend Yield: N/A
• Average Volume (3M): 107.53K
• Price to Earnings (P/E): ―
• Beta (1Y): 0.45
• Revenue Growth: -21.67%
• EPS Growth: 60.44%
• Country: US
• Employees: 639
• Sector: Industrials
• Sector Strength: 72
• Industry: Conglomerates
• EPS (TTM): -0.25
• Shares Outstanding: 48,194,035
• 10 Day Avg. Volume: 97,481
• 30 Day Avg. Volume: 107,532
• PEG Ratio: >-0.01
• Price to Book (P/B): 0.57
• Price to Sales (P/S): 0.77
• P/FCF Ratio: 0.88
• Enterprise Value/Market Cap: -0.28
• Enterprise Value/Revenue: -0.17
• Enterprise Value/Gross Profit: 64.52
• Enterprise Value/Ebitda: 0.65
• 1Y Price Target: N/A
• Price Target Upside: N/A
• Rating Consensus: N/A
• Number of Analyst Covering: 0
• EPS Forecast (FY): -0.29
• Revenue Forecast (FY): $163.90M

• Rating: 50 Neutral
• Price Target: $2.00 ▲(11.11% Upside)

Mammoth Energy Services faces significant challenges with declining revenues and profitability, reflected in its financial performance and valuation scores. The technical analysis indicates a bearish trend, while the earnings call provided some positive insights, particularly in the Drilling segment. Overall, the stock score reflects a need for improvement in profitability and revenue growth.

Positive Factors

Drilling Segment Success

The significant growth in the Drilling segment indicates strong operational performance and potential for sustained revenue increases, enhancing the company's market position in this area.

Positive Free Cash Flow

Positive free cash flow reflects efficient cash management and operational strength, providing the company with resources to invest in growth opportunities and weather financial challenges.

Balance Sheet Strength

A strong balance sheet with significant liquidity ensures financial stability, enabling the company to invest in strategic initiatives and manage economic downturns effectively.

Negative Factors

Revenue Decline

The decline in revenue highlights challenges in maintaining growth, which could impact the company's ability to expand and compete effectively in the long term.

Net Loss

Ongoing net losses indicate profitability challenges, which could strain financial resources and limit the company's ability to invest in growth and innovation.

Sand Segment Challenges

Significant revenue decline in the Sand segment suggests operational and market challenges, potentially impacting the company's overall revenue and profit margins.

Mammoth Energy Services Business Overview & Revenue Model

Company Description

Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (TUSK) is a diversified energy services company that primarily operates in the oil and natural gas sector. The company provides a wide range of services, including well construction, pressure pumping, and other specialized services to exploration and production companies. Additionally, Mammoth offers infrastructure services for renewable energy projects, positioning itself as a key player in both traditional and emerging energy markets.

How the Company Makes Money

Mammoth Energy Services generates revenue through multiple streams, primarily from its service offerings to the oil and gas industry. Key revenue streams include pressure pumping services, which involve hydraulic fracturing for oil and gas extraction, and well services that cover drilling and completion activities. The company also benefits from infrastructure projects related to renewable energy, which are increasingly important in the current energy landscape. Partnerships with major exploration and production companies enhance its revenue potential, as does the ability to adapt services to meet the evolving needs of the energy sector. Additionally, the company's involvement in emergency response and restoration services during natural disasters provides an ancillary revenue stream, further diversifying its earnings.

Mammoth Energy Services Financial Statement Overview

Summary

Mammoth Energy Services is facing significant challenges in achieving profitability and revenue growth, as reflected in its income statement. The balance sheet is stable with low leverage, but profitability remains an issue. Cash flow generation is relatively strong, but declining free cash flow growth is a concern. Overall, the company needs to focus on improving profitability and revenue growth to enhance its financial health.

Income Statement

Mammoth Energy Services has faced declining revenues with a negative revenue growth rate of -14.65% TTM. The company is struggling with profitability, as evidenced by negative net profit and EBIT margins. However, the gross profit margin of 21.80% TTM indicates some ability to cover direct costs. Overall, the income statement reflects challenges in achieving profitability and growth.

Balance Sheet

The balance sheet shows a low debt-to-equity ratio of 0.0189 TTM, indicating low leverage and potential financial stability. However, the return on equity is negative, reflecting ongoing losses. The equity ratio is not provided, but the low debt levels suggest a conservative capital structure. The balance sheet is stable but lacks profitability.

Cash Flow

Operating cash flow is strong relative to net income, with a coverage ratio of 1.63 TTM, indicating good cash generation from operations. However, free cash flow has declined by 16.11% TTM, which is a concern. The company maintains a positive free cash flow to net income ratio, suggesting some efficiency in converting earnings to cash.

Breakdown	TTM	Dec 2024	Dec 2023	Dec 2022	Dec 2021	Dec 2020
Income Statement
Total Revenue	146.87M	187.93M	309.49M	362.09M	228.96M	313.08M
Gross Profit	-385.00K	-7.90M	16.54M	19.23M	-47.84M	-14.26M
EBITDA	-38.05M	-168.25M	70.44M	88.77M	-39.41M	-19.06M
Net Income	-78.55M	-207.33M	-3.16M	-619.00K	-101.43M	-107.61M
Balance Sheet
Total Assets	336.75M	402.87M	721.96M	750.52M	728.12M	848.16M
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Short-Term Investments	140.36M	82.33M	24.30M	17.28M	11.66M	16.57M
Total Debt	4.78M	18.03M	55.95M	108.86M	104.78M	113.25M
Total Liabilities	87.51M	150.05M	261.86M	287.91M	264.90M	284.83M
Stockholders Equity	249.24M	252.82M	460.10M	462.62M	463.22M	563.33M
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow	81.61M	163.65M	11.99M	2.53M	-24.71M	130.00K
Operating Cash Flow	132.33M	180.72M	31.39M	15.27M	-18.86M	6.97M
Investing Cash Flow	54.08M	-10.43M	-8.79M	-2.12M	5.51M	-2.29M
Financing Cash Flow	-64.85M	-112.11M	-15.59M	-5.60M	8.43M	4.27M

Mammoth Energy Services Technical Analysis

• Technical Analysis Sentiment: Negative
• Last Price: 1.80
• 50DMA: Negative
• 100DMA: Negative
• 200DMA: Negative
• MACD: Negative
• RSI: Neutral
• STOCH: Neutral

Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in stock analysis to make informed investment decisions. For TUSK, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of 1.8 is below the 20-day moving average (MA) of 1.91, below the 50-day MA of 2.12, and below the 200-day MA of 2.38, indicating a bearish trend. The MACD of -0.09 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 36.27 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 39.48 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for TUSK.

Mammoth Energy Services Peers Comparison

Name	Overall Rating	Market Cap	P/E Ratio	ROE	Dividend Yield	Revenue Growth	EPS Growth
RCMT	70 Outperform	$145.10M	11.45	36.68%	―	13.70%	-13.35%
Sector *	63 Neutral	$10.79B	15.43	7.44%	2.01%	2.89%	-14.66%
CODI	59 Neutral	$553.74M	―	―	14.20%	6.77%	9.95%
TUSK	50 Neutral	$88.68M	―	-24.62%	―	-21.67%	60.44%
TRC	48 Neutral	$419.01M	-794.90	0.63%	―	15.71%	―
FIP	48 Neutral	$495.41M	-1.76	-13.99%	2.11%	32.39%	-19.35%
NNBR	45 Neutral	$61.24M	―	-24.06%	―	-9.85%	-11.65%

Mammoth Energy Services Corporate Events

Mammoth Energy Services’ Mixed Q3 Earnings Call Review

Mammoth Energy Services’ recent earnings call painted a picture of mixed performance, with notable successes in certain segments but challenges in others. The company demonstrated strong performance in its Drilling and Aviation segments, leading to positive free cash flow and a robust balance sheet. However, these achievements were tempered by a decline in overall revenue and a net loss, primarily attributed to underperformance in the Sand and Infrastructure segments.