Education
About Us
Working with TipRanks
Follow Us
SEA - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF (SEA)
Rating:58Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Solid Year-to-Date Performance
The ETF has delivered positive returns so far this year, showing that its strategy has recently been working for investors.
Strong Shipping and Logistics Leaders in Top Holdings
Several of the largest positions, such as Matson, Kuehne + Nagel, and Nippon Yusen, have shown strong gains this year, helping support the fund’s overall performance.
Global Diversification Across Key Trade Hubs
Holdings spread across Hong Kong, the U.S., Japan, and several European countries provide exposure to multiple major shipping and trade regions rather than relying on a single market.
Negative Factors
High Industry Concentration in Industrials
With most of the portfolio in industrials and a smaller slice in energy, the fund is heavily tied to the economic cycle of transportation and logistics rather than being broadly diversified across sectors.
Relatively High Expense Ratio
The fund’s fee is on the higher side for an ETF, which can gradually reduce net returns for long-term investors.
Mixed Performance Among Top Holdings
While some major positions have performed well, others like SITC International have been weak this year, creating uneven momentum within the portfolio.
SEA vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM12.11M
RegionGlobal
Expense Ratio0.60%
Beta0.80
IssuerUS Global
Inception DateJan 20, 2022
Dividend Yield5.84%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedU.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo Index - Benchmark TR Gross
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume6,572
30 Day Avg. Volume12,134
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price TargetN/A
Price Target UpsideN/A
Rating ConsensusN/A
Number of Analyst Covering0
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
SEA Summary
The U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF (SEA) tracks the U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo Index, focusing on companies that move goods around the world by sea and air. It mainly holds industrial and transportation firms involved in shipping and logistics, including well-known names like Matson and Kuehne + Nagel. An investor might choose SEA to benefit from growth in global trade and to get targeted exposure to the cargo and logistics theme instead of picking individual stocks. However, this ETF can be volatile and may go up or down with changes in global trade and transportation demand.
How much will it cost me?This ETF has an expense ratio of 0.60%, which means you’ll pay about $6 per year for every $1,000 you invest. That’s higher than the average ETF because it’s a specialized, actively managed fund focused on a niche area of the transportation industry.
What would affect this ETF?This global transportation-focused ETF could benefit if world trade grows, supply chains stay busy, and shipping and air freight companies like COSCO, Matson, and Kuehne + Nagel gain from higher cargo demand and improvements in logistics technology. On the other hand, it could be hurt by slower global economic growth, higher interest rates that raise borrowing costs, stricter environmental rules on shipping and energy use, or trade tensions that disrupt international cargo flows.
SEA Top 10 Holdings
SEA is essentially a pure play on global cargo shipping, with most of its muscle coming from Asian liners rather than U.S. giants. COSCO SHIPPING Energy is one of the main engines, rising recently and giving the fund a helpful tailwind, while Matson has also been climbing steadily and adding to the momentum. T.S. Lines and Orient Overseas look more mixed, contributing but not really stealing the show. Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha has been lagging, acting as a bit of an anchor. Overall, this is a globally focused, shipping-heavy bet, not a broad industrials basket.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COSCO SHIPPING Energy Transportation Co | 6.53% | $792.08K | HK$102.23B | 181.63% | 68 Neutral | |
| T.S. Lines Limited | 5.21% | $631.92K | HK$16.15B | 115.56% | 66 Neutral | |
| SITC International Holdings Co., Ltd. | 4.79% | $580.98K | HK$81.65B | 47.71% | 72 Outperform | |
| ― | 4.74% | $574.84K | ― | ― | ― | |
| Matson | 4.72% | $572.68K | $5.15B | 8.80% | 77 Outperform | |
| Orient Overseas (International) | 4.41% | $534.98K | HK$91.66B | 25.63% | 78 Outperform | |
| ― | 4.37% | $530.10K | ― | ― | ― | |
| COSCO SHIPPING Holdings Co | 4.31% | $523.12K | HK$241.98B | 22.57% | 79 Outperform | |
| Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha | 3.91% | $474.70K | ¥1.42T | -6.67% | 70 Outperform | |
| Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha | 3.73% | $452.59K | $13.94B | -3.44% | 77 Outperform |
SEA Technical Analysis
Positive
―
Price Trends
14.89
Positive
14.26
Positive
13.82
Positive
Market Momentum
0.41
Negative
69.56
Neutral
66.96
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For SEA, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 15.58, equal to the 50-day MA of 14.89, and equal to the 200-day MA of 13.82, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.41 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 69.56 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 66.96 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for SEA.
SEA Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
SEA
U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF
16.45
4.43
36.86%
EVX
VanEck Environmental Services ETF
―
―
―
NATO
Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF
―
―
―
WDGF
WisdomTree Global Defense Fund
―
―
―
SHPP
Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF
―
―
―
SUPL
ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
Disclaimer
This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents