Education
About Us
Working with TipRanks
Follow Us
PJBF - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF (PJBF)
Rating:72Outperform
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Top Holdings
Several key positions, such as Nvidia, Microsoft, and Alphabet, have delivered strong year-to-date gains, driving the fund’s performance.
Sector Focus on Growth
The ETF is heavily weighted toward technology and consumer cyclical sectors, which are known for their potential to outperform during periods of innovation and economic growth.
Global Diversification
While primarily focused on U.S. companies, the ETF includes exposure to international markets like Switzerland, France, and Hong Kong, adding geographic balance.
Negative Factors
High Expense Ratio
The ETF charges a relatively high expense ratio compared to many passive funds, which could eat into long-term returns.
Overweight in Technology
Nearly half of the portfolio is concentrated in the technology sector, making the fund vulnerable to downturns in tech stocks.
Weak Recent Performance
The ETF has shown negative returns over the past month, which may indicate short-term volatility or challenges in its holdings.
PJBF vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM10.87M
RegionGlobal
Expense Ratio0.59%
Beta1.31
IssuerPGIM
Inception DateDec 14, 2023
Dividend YieldN/A
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedNo Underlying Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume180
30 Day Avg. Volume110
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
75.89Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusStrong Buy
Number of Analyst Covering32
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
PJBF Summary
The PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF (PJBF) is an actively managed fund that focuses on companies with strong growth potential and sustainable business practices. It offers exposure to a wide range of industries, including technology, consumer goods, and healthcare, with a significant focus on U.S. companies. Some of its top holdings include well-known names like Nvidia and Microsoft. Investors might consider PJBF for its potential to deliver long-term growth and diversification across various sectors and market sizes. However, it’s important to note that the ETF is heavily weighted toward technology stocks, which means its performance can be impacted by fluctuations in the tech industry.
How much will it cost me?The PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF (PJBF) has an expense ratio of 0.59%, meaning you’ll pay $5.90 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because it’s actively managed, requiring more research and expertise to select investments.
What would affect this ETF?The PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF (PJBF) could benefit from continued growth in the technology sector, which makes up nearly half of its portfolio, as well as global economic recovery driving demand for consumer cyclical and healthcare companies. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, which can negatively impact growth-focused stocks, and regulatory changes in key markets like technology and finance that could affect its top holdings such as Nvidia, Microsoft, and Alphabet. Its global exposure also makes it sensitive to geopolitical tensions and currency fluctuations.
PJBF Top 10 Holdings
The PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF is leaning heavily into technology, with nearly half of its portfolio tied to the sector. Nvidia, a key holding, has been steady despite recent bearish momentum, while Alphabet’s rising performance, fueled by AI and cloud investments, is giving the fund a boost. Microsoft, however, has been lagging, weighed down by valuation concerns. Consumer cyclical names like Amazon and Shopify are showing mixed results, with short-term weakness tempering their long-term growth stories. This global fund’s tech-heavy focus positions it for growth but adds volatility to its ride.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nvidia | 9.18% | $979.76K | $4.25T | 33.55% | 76 Outperform | |
| Alphabet Class A | 8.84% | $943.64K | $3.74T | 56.73% | 85 Outperform | |
| Microsoft | 6.56% | $700.09K | $3.56T | 5.14% | 79 Outperform | |
| Galderma Group AG | 5.58% | $594.85K | CHF38.42B | 81.23% | 70 Outperform | |
| Amazon | 5.10% | $544.44K | $2.42T | -4.46% | 71 Outperform | |
| TSMC | 5.00% | $533.56K | $1.22T | 42.29% | 81 Outperform | |
| Apple | 4.90% | $522.33K | $4.11T | 9.19% | 79 Outperform | |
| Shopify | 4.89% | $521.63K | $213.68B | 37.87% | 77 Outperform | |
| Hermes International | 3.43% | $365.74K | €223.31B | 5.36% | 79 Outperform | |
| CrowdStrike Holdings | 3.35% | $357.38K | $127.25B | 25.57% | 67 Neutral |
PJBF Technical Analysis
Negative
―
Price Trends
63.46
Negative
62.41
Negative
59.76
Positive
Market Momentum
0.07
Positive
42.45
Neutral
21.47
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For PJBF, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 63.01, equal to the 50-day MA of 63.46, and equal to the 200-day MA of 59.76, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of 0.07 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 42.45 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 21.47 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for PJBF.
PJBF Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
PJBF
PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF
62.31
-0.50
-0.80%
GINX
SGI Enhanced Global Income ETF
―
―
―
ICAP
InfraCap Equity Income Fund ETF
―
―
―
TOLL
Tema Monopolies and Oligopolies ETF
―
―
―
GOP
Unusual Whales Subversive Republican Trading ETF
―
―
―
CAMX
Cambiar Aggressive Value ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
Disclaimer
This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents