tiprankstipranks
Trending News
More News >
Advertisement

PJBF - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

PJBF

PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF (PJBF)

Rating:71Outperform
Price Target:
$69.00
The PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF (PJBF) benefits significantly from its top holdings like Nvidia and Microsoft, which contribute positively to the fund's rating due to their strong financial performance and growth in AI and cloud technologies. However, weaker holdings like Oracle, with bearish momentum and high debt levels, slightly weigh down the overall rating. The ETF's concentration in high-growth tech companies presents both opportunities for expansion and risks related to valuation concerns.
Positive Factors
Strong Top Holdings
Several key positions, such as Nvidia, Microsoft, and Alphabet, have delivered strong year-to-date gains, driving the fund’s performance.
Sector Focus on Growth
The ETF is heavily weighted toward technology and consumer cyclical sectors, which are known for their potential to outperform during periods of innovation and economic growth.
Global Diversification
While primarily focused on U.S. companies, the ETF includes exposure to international markets like Switzerland, France, and Hong Kong, adding geographic balance.
Negative Factors
High Expense Ratio
The ETF charges a relatively high expense ratio compared to many passive funds, which could eat into long-term returns.
Overweight in Technology
Nearly half of the portfolio is concentrated in the technology sector, making the fund vulnerable to downturns in tech stocks.
Weak Recent Performance
The ETF has shown negative returns over the past month, which may indicate short-term volatility or challenges in its holdings.

PJBF vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

PJBF Summary

The PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF (PJBF) is an actively managed fund that focuses on companies with strong growth potential and sustainable business practices. It offers exposure to a wide range of industries, including technology, consumer goods, and healthcare, with a significant focus on U.S. companies. Some of its top holdings include well-known names like Nvidia and Microsoft. Investors might consider PJBF for its potential to deliver long-term growth and diversification across various sectors and market sizes. However, it’s important to note that the ETF is heavily weighted toward technology stocks, which means its performance can be impacted by fluctuations in the tech industry.
How much will it cost me?The PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF (PJBF) has an expense ratio of 0.59%, meaning you’ll pay $5.90 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because it’s actively managed, requiring more research and expertise to select investments.
What would affect this ETF?The PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF (PJBF) could benefit from continued growth in the technology sector, which makes up nearly half of its portfolio, as well as global economic recovery driving demand for consumer cyclical and healthcare companies. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, which can negatively impact growth-focused stocks, and regulatory changes in key markets like technology and finance that could affect its top holdings such as Nvidia, Microsoft, and Alphabet. Its global exposure also makes it sensitive to geopolitical tensions and currency fluctuations.

PJBF Top 10 Holdings

The PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF leans heavily into technology, with nearly half of its portfolio in the sector, led by Nvidia and Microsoft. Nvidia’s strong performance, fueled by its dominance in AI infrastructure, has been a key driver for the fund, while Microsoft’s steady growth in cloud services adds stability. Shopify and TSMC are also rising stars, benefiting from innovation and global demand for advanced technologies. However, Mercadolibre and Amazon have been lagging, with mixed technical signals and valuation concerns holding them back. Overall, the fund’s global exposure and tech-heavy focus position it for long-term growth but may amplify volatility.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Nvidia9.91%$1.04M$4.53T23.36%
76
Outperform
Alphabet Class A7.73%$814.02K$3.44T59.60%
80
Outperform
Microsoft7.05%$742.46K$3.77T18.84%
82
Outperform
Galderma Group AG5.05%$532.08KCHF34.38B69.88%
69
Neutral
TSMC4.89%$515.23K$1.20T46.52%
81
Outperform
Apple4.76%$502.02K$3.95T17.15%
80
Outperform
Shopify4.22%$444.56K$183.12B34.29%
70
Neutral
Amazon4.21%$443.85K$2.49T8.77%
76
Outperform
CrowdStrike Holdings3.56%$375.08K$132.95B45.40%
73
Outperform
Oracle3.35%$352.66K$626.78B15.59%
64
Neutral

PJBF Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Negative
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
63.35
Negative
100DMA
62.05
Negative
200DMA
59.65
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
-0.35
Positive
RSI
41.32
Neutral
STOCH
6.70
Positive
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For PJBF, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 63.94, equal to the 50-day MA of 63.35, and equal to the 200-day MA of 59.65, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.35 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 41.32 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 6.70 is Positive, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for PJBF.

PJBF Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$10.39M0.59%
71
Outperform
$79.01M0.99%
60
Neutral
$71.21M0.55%
72
Outperform
$70.41M3.19%
72
Outperform
$59.80M0.75%
69
Neutral
$58.71M0.59%
69
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
PJBF
PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF
61.84
1.03
1.69%
GINX
SGI Enhanced Global Income ETF
TOLL
Tema Monopolies and Oligopolies ETF
ICAP
InfraCap Equity Income Fund ETF
GOP
Unusual Whales Subversive Republican Trading ETF
CAMX
Cambiar Aggressive Value ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement