tiprankstipranks
Trending News
More News >
Advertisement

MXI - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

MXI

iShares Global Materials ETF (MXI)

Rating:67Neutral
Price Target:
MXI, the iShares Global Materials ETF, has a solid overall rating driven mainly by strong, well-established materials companies like Newmont, Rio Tinto, Agnico Eagle, and Barrick, which show robust financial performance, positive earnings, and generally supportive technical trends. However, some key holdings such as Linde, Air Liquide, Sherwin-Williams, and Freeport-McMoRan face bearish technical signals, valuation concerns, or operational risks, which hold the fund back from a higher rating. The main risk factor is its concentration in the global materials sector, meaning performance is closely tied to commodity cycles and sector-specific challenges.
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Performance
The ETF has shown solid gains over the past month, three months, and year to date, indicating positive recent momentum.
Leading Materials Companies
Many of the top holdings, including major mining and materials names, have delivered strong year-to-date results that support the fund’s overall performance.
Global Materials Exposure
The fund holds materials companies from several major markets such as the U.S., UK, Japan, and others, giving investors broad international exposure within the sector.
Negative Factors
Sector Concentration Risk
With the vast majority of assets in the materials sector, the ETF is highly sensitive to swings in commodity prices and global economic cycles.
Moderate Fee Level
The expense ratio is not especially low for a passive ETF, meaning costs may weigh slightly more on long-term returns compared with cheaper alternatives.
Mixed Performance Among Top Holdings
A few significant positions have shown weak or negative year-to-date performance, which can offset gains from stronger holdings and add volatility.

MXI vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

MXI Summary

The iShares Global Materials ETF (MXI) tracks the S&P Global 1200 Materials Index, focusing on companies that mine, process, and produce raw materials like metals, chemicals, and building products. It holds well-known names such as BHP Group and Sherwin-Williams, and invests in firms from the U.S., U.K., Japan, and other major markets. Someone might consider MXI to add global diversification and gain from long-term demand for infrastructure, construction, and industrial growth. A key risk is that materials stocks can be very sensitive to the global economy and commodity prices, so the ETF can rise and fall sharply.
How much will it cost me?The iShares Global Materials ETF (MXI) has an expense ratio of 0.39%, which means you’ll pay $3.90 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than average for ETFs because it is focused on a specific sector and offers global exposure, which typically requires more active management. Overall, it’s a reasonable cost for the targeted diversification it provides.
What would affect this ETF?The iShares Global Materials ETF (MXI) could benefit from increased global infrastructure development and the growing demand for sustainable materials, which align with the fund's focus on companies like Linde and BHP Group. However, it may face challenges from fluctuating commodity prices, regulatory changes in mining and chemicals, and economic slowdowns that impact industrial activity. Its global exposure helps mitigate risks tied to specific regions but also makes it sensitive to worldwide economic conditions.

MXI Top 10 Holdings

MXI is very much a materials story, with performance lately powered by gold and mining names. Newmont, Agnico Eagle, Barrick, and Freeport-McMoRan have been rising, giving the fund a strong tailwind from precious metals and copper. Heavyweights like BHP and Rio Tinto are also pulling their weight, adding steady support from diversified mining. On the flip side, industrial gas giant Air Liquide and building-materials player CRH have been lagging, slightly dulling the shine. Overall, it’s a globally diversified bet on the materials cycle, but with clear concentration in miners.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Linde7.20%$24.67M$224.60B5.25%
66
Neutral
BHP Group Ltd5.91%$20.22MAU$259.65B43.66%
68
Neutral
Newmont Mining4.40%$15.08M$137.28B170.30%
81
Outperform
Air Liquide3.73%$12.77M€97.94B-2.44%
66
Neutral
Agnico Eagle3.49%$11.97M$108.59B125.97%
80
Outperform
Rio Tinto3.35%$11.47M£122.85B41.34%
82
Outperform
Freeport-McMoRan2.89%$9.91M$90.23B59.21%
67
Neutral
Sherwin-Williams Company2.73%$9.34M$91.45B3.37%
66
Neutral
CRH plc2.71%$9.27M£61.92B6.80%
76
Outperform
Barrick Mining2.60%$8.89M$80.22B167.06%
80
Outperform

MXI Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
102.00
Positive
100DMA
96.37
Positive
200DMA
91.01
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
2.94
Negative
RSI
64.41
Neutral
STOCH
82.73
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For MXI, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 108.68, equal to the 50-day MA of 102.00, and equal to the 200-day MA of 91.01, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 2.94 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 64.41 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 82.73 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for MXI.

MXI Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$339.10M0.39%
$763.33M0.50%
$393.30M0.50%
$285.86M0.65%
$211.73M0.60%
$204.92M0.56%
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
MXI
iShares Global Materials ETF
112.77
30.16
36.51%
SGDM
Sprott Gold Miners ETF
SGDJ
Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF
COPP
Sprott Copper Miners ETF
GOAU
U.S. Global GO GOLD and Precious Metal Miners ETF
SLX
VanEck Steel ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement