tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

JGRW - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

JGRW

Jensen Quality Growth ETF (JGRW)

Rating:75Outperform
Price Target:
JGRW, the Jensen Quality Growth ETF, earns a solid overall rating thanks to large positions in high-quality growth leaders like Alphabet and Microsoft, whose strong financial results and strategic focus on AI and cloud services support the fund’s long-term potential. The rating is held back somewhat by holdings such as Amazon and Eli Lilly, where premium valuations, cash flow and leverage concerns, and some mixed or bearish technical signals introduce added risk. The main risk factor is the fund’s heavy tilt toward a concentrated group of large technology and AI-focused companies, which can increase volatility if sentiment toward this sector weakens.
Positive Factors
Leading Mega-Cap Growth Holdings
The ETF’s largest positions include well-known technology and growth companies, several of which have shown strong recent performance and help support the fund’s returns.
Focused but Multi-Sector Exposure
While technology is the largest slice, the fund also holds stocks in communication services, health care, financials, and other sectors, which helps spread risk across different parts of the economy.
Recent Short-Term Rebound
Despite a weak year-to-date result, the ETF has shown a strong gain over the past month, suggesting some positive short-term momentum in its holdings.
Negative Factors
High Technology Concentration
A large share of the portfolio is in technology stocks, which can make the fund more sensitive to downturns in that single sector.
Several Key Holdings Are Lagging
Some of the top positions, including major technology and health care names, have shown weak performance this year, which has weighed on overall returns.
Higher Expense Ratio for an ETF
The fund’s expense ratio is on the higher side for an ETF, meaning more of the investment’s return is used to cover fees.

JGRW vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

JGRW Summary

The Jensen Quality Growth ETF (JGRW) is an actively managed fund that focuses on high-quality growth companies across the U.S. stock market, rather than tracking a specific index. It leans heavily toward technology and communication services, with major holdings like Microsoft and Alphabet (Google’s parent company), plus other well-known names such as Apple and Amazon. Someone might invest in JGRW to seek long-term growth by owning a concentrated group of strong, financially healthy businesses. A key risk is that it’s heavily tilted toward growth and tech-related stocks, so its price can rise and fall more than the overall market.
How much will it cost me?The Jensen Quality Growth ETF (JGRW) has an expense ratio of 0.57%, which means you’ll pay $5.70 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than the average for ETFs because it is actively managed, focusing on selecting high-quality growth companies rather than tracking an index. Active management typically involves more research and decision-making, which increases costs.
What would affect this ETF?The Jensen Quality Growth ETF (JGRW) could benefit from continued innovation and strong performance in the technology and healthcare sectors, which make up a significant portion of its holdings. However, rising interest rates or economic slowdowns could negatively impact growth-oriented companies, particularly in sectors like technology and financials. Regulatory changes or geopolitical tensions affecting U.S.-based companies may also pose risks to the ETF's future performance.

JGRW Top 10 Holdings

JGRW is leaning heavily on U.S. mega-cap tech, with Alphabet, Apple, Nvidia, and Amazon doing most of the heavy lifting as their shares continue to rise on the back of AI, cloud, and digital spending. KLA and Broadcom add even more semiconductor flavor, giving the fund a clear tech-and-chips backbone. On the flip side, Microsoft and Meta look a bit tired, with more mixed or lagging moves that temper overall momentum. With its top names clustered in U.S. technology and communication services, this ETF is very much riding the Big Tech growth wave.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Alphabet Class A9.97%$9.30M$4.40T100.95%
85
Outperform
Apple9.40%$8.76M$4.27T46.68%
79
Outperform
Microsoft6.96%$6.49M$3.00T-14.34%
79
Outperform
Nvidia6.53%$6.09M$5.04T44.62%
76
Outperform
KLA6.18%$5.76M$279.46B145.34%
77
Outperform
Amazon5.90%$5.50M$2.63T11.63%
71
Outperform
Eli Lilly & Co5.12%$4.77M$1.08T40.53%
72
Outperform
Sherwin-Williams Company4.23%$3.95M$76.59B-13.04%
66
Neutral
Mastercard4.12%$3.85M$437.59B-17.21%
75
Outperform
Broadcom4.03%$3.76M$1.86T47.13%
76
Outperform

JGRW Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Neutral
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
26.36
Positive
100DMA
26.10
Positive
200DMA
26.55
Negative
Market Momentum
MACD
0.11
Positive
RSI
43.13
Neutral
STOCH
13.46
Positive
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For JGRW, the sentiment is Neutral. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 26.94, equal to the 50-day MA of 26.36, and equal to the 200-day MA of 26.55, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of 0.11 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 43.13 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 13.46 is Positive, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Neutral sentiment for JGRW.

JGRW Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$100.83M0.57%
75
Outperform
$98.00M0.75%
73
Outperform
$94.50M0.55%
74
Outperform
$92.04M0.67%
70
Outperform
$62.56M0.60%
73
Outperform
$42.96M0.50%
73
Outperform
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
JGRW
Jensen Quality Growth ETF
26.47
0.05
0.19%
AOTG
AOT Growth and Innovation ETF
GROZ
Zacks Focus Growth ETF
TSEL
Touchstone Sands Capital US Select Growth ETF
SEMG
Suncoast Select Growth ETF
RILA
Indexperts Gorilla Aggressive Growth ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement