Education
About Us
Working with TipRanks
Follow Us
JGRW - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Jensen Quality Growth ETF (JGRW)
Rating:74Outperform
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
High-Quality Blue-Chip Holdings
The ETF is built around well-known, financially strong companies, which can provide a more stable foundation for long-term investors.
Focused Yet Spread-Out Sector Mix
While technology is the largest slice, the fund also holds meaningful positions in health care, communication services, industrials, and financials, helping spread risk across several parts of the economy.
Selective Stock Strength Within Top Positions
Some key holdings, such as Alphabet, KLA, Eli Lilly, Amazon, and Waste Management, have shown positive or steady performance, helping offset weakness in other names.
Negative Factors
Recent Weak Performance
The ETF has delivered negative returns over the past month, three months, and year-to-date, which may concern investors looking for near-term gains.
Heavy Concentration in Technology and a Few Stocks
A large portion of the fund is tied up in technology and a small group of big names like Microsoft, Apple, and Nvidia, increasing the impact if these stocks or the sector struggle.
Higher Expense Ratio for an ETF
The fund’s expense ratio is on the higher side for an ETF, which means more of the returns are eaten up by fees over time.
JGRW vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM118.94M
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.57%
Beta0.73
IssuerJensen
Inception DateAug 13, 2024
Dividend Yield0.57%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedNo Underlying Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume16,854
30 Day Avg. Volume24,697
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
32.11Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusStrong Buy
Number of Analyst Covering27
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
JGRW Summary
Jensen Quality Growth ETF (JGRW) is an actively managed fund that focuses on high-quality growth companies across the U.S. stock market, rather than tracking a specific index. It holds many well-known names, including Microsoft, Apple, Amazon, and Nvidia, with a heavy tilt toward technology and other leading industries. Someone might consider investing in JGRW to seek long-term growth from established, financially strong businesses while still getting diversification across sectors. A key risk is that it is heavily exposed to growth and tech-related stocks, so its price can rise and fall more sharply than the overall market.
How much will it cost me?The Jensen Quality Growth ETF (JGRW) has an expense ratio of 0.57%, which means you’ll pay $5.70 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than the average for ETFs because it is actively managed, focusing on selecting high-quality growth companies rather than tracking an index. Active management typically involves more research and decision-making, which increases costs.
What would affect this ETF?The Jensen Quality Growth ETF (JGRW) could benefit from continued innovation and strong performance in the technology and healthcare sectors, which make up a significant portion of its holdings. However, rising interest rates or economic slowdowns could negatively impact growth-oriented companies, particularly in sectors like technology and financials. Regulatory changes or geopolitical tensions affecting U.S.-based companies may also pose risks to the ETF's future performance.
JGRW Top 10 Holdings
JGRW is leaning heavily on U.S. mega-cap tech, with Microsoft and Apple acting like twin engines that have recently sputtered, putting some drag on returns. Alphabet and Amazon are doing more of the heavy lifting, with rising or steady trends that help offset the tech softness. Nvidia and KLA show a mixed semiconductor story, with KLA’s strong run helping to counter Nvidia’s more cautious tone. Outside tech, Eli Lilly adds a healthy dose of growth from healthcare, but overall the fund’s story is still dominated by a concentrated, U.S.-centric tech tilt.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apple | 8.87% | $10.55M | $3.88T | 6.12% | 79 Outperform | |
| Alphabet Class A | 8.13% | $9.66M | $3.67T | 68.57% | 85 Outperform | |
| Microsoft | 8.00% | $9.51M | $2.97T | -2.39% | 79 Outperform | |
| Nvidia | 7.10% | $8.44M | $4.57T | 39.78% | 76 Outperform | |
| KLA | 4.89% | $5.81M | $194.03B | 98.33% | 77 Outperform | |
| Eli Lilly & Co | 4.82% | $5.73M | $962.75B | 15.55% | 72 Outperform | |
| Mastercard | 4.58% | $5.45M | $470.86B | -6.68% | 75 Outperform | |
| Meta Platforms | 4.51% | $5.37M | $1.63T | -4.08% | 76 Outperform | |
| Waste Management | 4.29% | $5.10M | $94.40B | 2.36% | 76 Outperform | |
| Stryker | 4.12% | $4.90M | $144.40B | -0.67% | 70 Outperform |
JGRW Technical Analysis
Negative
―
Price Trends
26.77
Negative
26.88
Negative
26.67
Negative
Market Momentum
-0.31
Positive
41.62
Neutral
40.48
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For JGRW, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 26.34, equal to the 50-day MA of 26.77, and equal to the 200-day MA of 26.67, indicating a bearish trend. The MACD of -0.31 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 41.62 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 40.48 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for JGRW.
JGRW Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
JGRW
Jensen Quality Growth ETF
25.98
-0.33
-1.25%
LSGR
Natixis Loomis Sayles Focused Growth ETF
―
―
―
BASG
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth ETF
―
―
―
GQGU
GQG US Equity ETF
―
―
―
FDG
American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF
―
―
―
GSGO
Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
Disclaimer
This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents