Education
About Us
Working with TipRanks
Follow Us
GPZ - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF (GPZ)
Rating:54Neutral
Price Target:
$32.09
Positive Factors
Strong Top Holding
Brookfield Corporation, the largest position, has delivered strong year-to-date gains, supporting the fund’s overall performance.
Global Exposure
The ETF includes holdings from multiple countries, providing some diversification beyond the U.S. market.
Reasonable Expense Ratio
The ETF’s expense ratio is relatively low, making it cost-effective compared to actively managed funds.
Negative Factors
Sector Concentration
The ETF is heavily weighted in the financial sector, which increases vulnerability to industry-specific risks.
Underperforming Holdings
Several top holdings, including Apollo Global Management and KKR & Co, have lagged year-to-date, dragging down the fund’s performance.
Weak Short-Term Performance
The ETF has struggled in the past month and three months, reflecting recent market challenges.
GPZ vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM110.29M
RegionDeveloped Markets
Expense Ratio0.40%
Beta1.70
IssuerVanEck
Inception DateJun 04, 2025
Dividend YieldN/A
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedMarketVector Alternative Asset Managers Index - Benchmark TR Net
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume112,429
30 Day Avg. Volume118,346
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
32.47Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering21
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
GPZ Summary
The VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF (GPZ) is a fund that focuses on companies in the financial sector, specifically those involved in alternative asset management like private equity and business development. It tracks the MarketVector Alternative Asset Managers Index and includes well-known firms such as Blackstone Group and Brookfield Corporation. This ETF could be a good choice for investors looking to diversify their portfolio and gain exposure to innovative financial strategies. However, it’s important to note that its performance is closely tied to the financial sector, which can be sensitive to economic changes.
How much will it cost me?The VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF (GPZ) has an expense ratio of 0.40%, which means you’ll pay $4 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than average for ETFs because it is focused on a specific niche within the financial sector and may require more active management compared to broad, passively managed funds.
What would affect this ETF?The VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF (GPZ) could benefit from growing interest in alternative investments like private equity and business development companies, especially as investors seek diversification beyond traditional financial products. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, which can increase borrowing costs for asset managers, and regulatory changes that could impact the operations of firms in this niche. Its focus on developed markets and heavy exposure to financials makes it sensitive to broader economic conditions and sector-specific trends.
GPZ Top 10 Holdings
The VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF (GPZ) is heavily concentrated in the financial sector, with names like Blackstone, KKR, and Apollo Global Management leading the charge. Unfortunately, these alternative asset managers have been lagging recently, weighed down by market headwinds and valuation concerns. Ares Management has also struggled, showing bearish momentum despite its strong fundamentals. On the brighter side, Brookfield Corporation has been steady, offering a glimmer of resilience. With nearly all holdings tied to developed markets, this fund is a niche play on financial innovation, but recent performance suggests it’s facing some turbulence.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brookfield Corporation | 13.12% | $14.46M | $108.78B | 14.95% | ― | |
| Blackstone Group | 10.56% | $11.65M | $172.53B | -24.36% | 69 Neutral | |
| KKR & Co | 9.55% | $10.53M | $106.89B | -25.21% | 67 Neutral | |
| Apollo Global Management | 8.67% | $9.56M | $75.80B | -24.32% | 75 Outperform | |
| Ares Management | 6.35% | $7.01M | $47.85B | -15.15% | 64 Neutral | |
| EQT AB | 5.03% | $5.55M | kr394.49B | 10.85% | 72 Outperform | |
| TPG | 4.82% | $5.31M | $21.88B | -16.90% | 61 Neutral | |
| Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. Class A | 4.62% | $5.10M | $83.01B | -7.94% | ― | |
| Partners Group Holding AG | 4.49% | $4.95M | CHF24.67B | -24.01% | 66 Neutral | |
| Intermediate Capital | 4.21% | $4.64M | £5.42B | -7.49% | 68 Neutral |
GPZ Technical Analysis
Negative
―
Price Trends
27.06
Negative
27.56
Negative
Market Momentum
-0.41
Positive
33.08
Neutral
19.37
Positive
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For GPZ, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 25.94, equal to the 50-day MA of 27.06, and equal to the 200-day MA of ―, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.41 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 33.08 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 19.37 is Positive, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for GPZ.
GPZ Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
GPZ
VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF
24.69
-0.76
-2.99%
SRVR
Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF
―
―
―
FINX
Global X Fintech Etf
―
―
―
SNSR
Global X Internet of Things ETF
―
―
―
WCBR
WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund
―
―
―
INDS
Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
Disclaimer
This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents