tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

GCOW - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

GCOW

Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW)

Rating:68Neutral
Price Target:
GCOW’s rating suggests it is a solid but not top-tier dividend-focused ETF, supported by several strong, stable companies. High-quality holdings like Novartis, PepsiCo, and GlaxoSmithKline boost the fund with strong financial performance, solid profitability, and supportive strategic initiatives, while consumer staples leaders like Nestlé and Unilever add stability despite some technical and valuation concerns. On the weaker side, names such as Philip Morris and Altria face leverage, technical, and industry challenges, and the fund’s notable exposure to tobacco and a few large defensive sectors is a key risk if those areas fall out of favor.
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Performance
The ETF has delivered solid gains so far this year and in recent months, showing positive momentum.
Well-Performing Top Holdings
Many of the largest positions, especially in energy and materials, have shown strong year-to-date performance, helping drive the fund’s returns.
Global Diversification
Holdings spread across the U.S., Europe, Asia, and other regions help reduce the impact of weakness in any single country.
Negative Factors
Above-Average Expense Ratio
The fund’s fee is on the higher side for an ETF, which can slightly reduce long-term returns compared with lower-cost options.
Heavy Exposure to Energy and Materials
A large share of the portfolio is tied to energy and related sectors, which can make the fund more sensitive to swings in commodity prices.
Limited Technology and Utilities Exposure
Very small allocations to technology and utilities mean investors may miss out on growth or defensive benefits from those areas.

GCOW vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

GCOW Summary

GCOW is the Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF, which follows the Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend Index. It invests in large, established companies around the world that generate strong cash flow and pay dividends. The fund holds well-known names like Exxon Mobil and Chevron, along with other big global firms in energy, consumer, and health care sectors. Someone might consider GCOW for global diversification and a focus on dividend income from financially solid companies. A key risk is that it holds many energy and commodity-related stocks, so its value can swing with those markets and overall global stock conditions.
How much will it cost me?The Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) has an expense ratio of 0.6%, which means you’ll pay $6 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because the fund is actively managed, focusing on selecting companies with strong free cash flow yields to provide consistent dividends. The higher cost reflects the strategic approach and specialized research involved in managing the fund.
What would affect this ETF?The Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) could benefit from stable demand in defensive sectors like Health Care and Consumer Defensive, which make up a significant portion of its holdings, especially during economic uncertainty. However, its exposure to Energy and Materials sectors may face challenges if commodity prices decline or if stricter environmental regulations impact profitability. Additionally, global economic conditions and interest rate changes could influence the performance of its large-cap multinational holdings.

GCOW Top 10 Holdings

GCOW’s story is all about steady global cash generators, with a clear tilt toward defensive sectors like consumer staples and telecoms. European giants such as Nestlé and Unilever have been more mixed, with Nestlé treading water while Unilever has lost some steam, softening the fund’s stride. On the brighter side, Novartis and Enel are quietly pulling their weight, rising on solid fundamentals. In contrast, U.S. telecom names like AT&T and Verizon have been lagging, acting as a bit of an anchor on this otherwise globally diversified, developed-markets portfolio.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Unilever2.24%$72.02M£99.53B-7.07%
72
Outperform
Nestlé SA2.21%$70.78MCHF217.48B6.50%
71
Outperform
Novartis AG2.18%$69.98MCHF233.53B28.16%
80
Outperform
British American Tobacco2.13%$68.47M£99.78B28.60%
71
Outperform
Enel S.p.A.2.11%$67.76M€104.21B24.89%
67
Neutral
GlaxoSmithKline2.10%$67.29M£80.71B42.10%
77
Outperform
Philip Morris2.08%$66.72M$284.08B5.67%
61
Neutral
Medtronic2.07%$66.48M$106.49B-5.36%
80
Outperform
PepsiCo2.07%$66.32M$197.12B7.36%
78
Outperform
Bristol-Myers Squibb2.06%$66.25M$118.71B23.24%
78
Outperform

GCOW Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
44.98
Negative
100DMA
45.23
Negative
200DMA
42.69
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
-0.32
Negative
RSI
47.29
Neutral
STOCH
62.16
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For GCOW, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 44.02, equal to the 50-day MA of 44.98, and equal to the 200-day MA of 42.69, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.32 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 47.29 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 62.16 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for GCOW.

GCOW Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$3.23B0.60%
68
Neutral
$8.06B0.24%
72
Outperform
$1.71B0.15%
71
Outperform
$663.24M0.30%
63
Neutral
$261.84M0.15%
66
Neutral
$228.08M0.50%
71
Outperform
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
GCOW
Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF
44.09
7.27
19.74%
URTH
iShares MSCI World ETF
GSWO
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Equity ETF
WSML
iShares MSCI World Small-Cap ETF
IQSI
IQ Candriam ESG International Equity ETF
GDIV
Harbor Dividend Growth Leaders ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement