Education
About Us
Working with TipRanks
Follow Us
ESPO - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO)
Rating:58Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Top Holdings
Several top holdings, including Tencent, Nintendo, and Roblox, have shown strong year-to-date performance, supporting the ETF's overall returns.
Global Exposure
The ETF invests in companies across multiple countries, including the U.S., Japan, and Hong Kong, providing geographic diversification.
Focused Sector Allocation
The fund's heavy exposure to Communication Services aligns well with the growing demand for video gaming and eSports.
Negative Factors
High Sector Concentration
Nearly 70% of the ETF is allocated to Communication Services, which makes it vulnerable to sector-specific risks.
Underperforming Holdings
Some key holdings, such as Aristocrat Leisure and GameStop, have shown weak year-to-date performance, which could drag on overall returns.
Moderate Expense Ratio
The ETF's expense ratio is higher than many broad-market ETFs, which could reduce net returns over time.
ESPO vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM343.81M
RegionGlobal
Expense Ratio0.56%
Beta1.03
IssuerVanEck
Inception DateOct 16, 2018
Dividend Yield1.24%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedMVIS Global Video Gaming & eSports
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume51,027
30 Day Avg. Volume49,246
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
122.36Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering21
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
ESPO Summary
The VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) is an investment fund focused on the fast-growing video gaming and eSports industry. It includes companies like Tencent and Nintendo, which are leaders in game development and digital entertainment. This ETF follows the MVIS Global Video Gaming & eSports Index, giving investors exposure to a mix of global companies involved in gaming hardware, software, and streaming. Someone might consider investing in ESPO to benefit from the growth of the gaming industry and the increasing popularity of eSports. However, it’s important to know that this ETF is heavily tied to the gaming sector, so its performance can fluctuate with trends in that industry.
How much will it cost me?The VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) has an expense ratio of 0.56%, which means you’ll pay $5.60 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than average because it’s a specialized, sector-focused fund that requires more active management to target companies in the video gaming and eSports industry.
What would affect this ETF?The VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) could benefit from continued growth in the global gaming and eSports industry, driven by increasing consumer demand for digital entertainment and advancements in technology. However, potential risks include regulatory changes in key markets like China, where Tencent has significant exposure, and economic downturns that may reduce discretionary spending on gaming. Additionally, competition within the gaming sector could impact the performance of top holdings like Nintendo and Roblox.
ESPO Top 10 Holdings
The VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) is heavily concentrated in the gaming and digital entertainment sector, with global exposure. Tencent and NetEase, two major players in the space, are showing mixed momentum, with Tencent losing steam and NetEase facing short-term weakness despite strong fundamentals. Nintendo is dragging the fund with a bearish trend, while Unity Software is rising on strong technical momentum and product advancements. Meanwhile, Roblox’s struggles with profitability and engagement growth are holding back performance. Overall, the fund’s focus on gaming giants and innovators makes it a bet on the evolving digital entertainment landscape.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tencent Holdings | 8.22% | $28.82M | HK$5.52T | 68.06% | 75 Outperform | |
| NetEase | 7.36% | $25.83M | $85.39B | 55.71% | 81 Outperform | |
| Nintendo Co | 7.07% | $24.80M | ¥11.83T | 9.43% | 63 Neutral | |
| Electronic Arts | 6.05% | $21.22M | $51.05B | 44.99% | 70 Outperform | |
| Take-Two | 5.67% | $19.89M | $46.63B | 41.30% | 53 Neutral | |
| Roblox | 5.13% | $17.98M | $51.87B | 19.52% | 51 Neutral | |
| Aristocrat Leisure | 5.01% | $17.56M | AU$35.08B | -18.41% | 67 Neutral | |
| NEXON Co | 4.77% | $16.73M | ¥3.25T | 93.64% | 76 Outperform | |
| BANDAI NAMCO Holdings | 4.42% | $15.49M | $17.27B | 19.28% | 62 Neutral | |
| GameStop | 4.38% | $15.36M | $9.60B | -33.70% | 66 Neutral |
ESPO Technical Analysis
Negative
―
Price Trends
107.55
Negative
111.85
Negative
105.65
Negative
Market Momentum
-0.99
Negative
37.49
Neutral
34.25
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For ESPO, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 104.63, equal to the 50-day MA of 107.55, and equal to the 200-day MA of 105.65, indicating a bearish trend. The MACD of -0.99 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 37.49 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 34.25 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for ESPO.
ESPO Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
ESPO
VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF
103.70
22.80
28.18%
IVES
Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF
―
―
―
CGW
Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF
―
―
―
BUG
Global X Cybersecurity Etf
―
―
―
IHAK
iShares Cybersecurity & Tech ETF
―
―
―
HERO
Global X Video Games & Esports ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
Disclaimer
This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents