EPP - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
iShares MSCI Pacific ex-Japan ETF (EPP)
Rating:66Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Solid Recent Performance
The ETF has shown strong gains so far this year and in recent months, indicating positive momentum in its underlying markets.
Strong Core Holdings
Several of the largest positions, especially major Australian banks and resource companies, have delivered strong year-to-date results that support the fund’s overall performance.
Regional Diversification in the Pacific
Exposure to Australia, Hong Kong, Singapore, New Zealand, and a small U.S. allocation provides a spread across multiple Pacific-region markets rather than relying on a single country.
Negative Factors
High Country Concentration
With a large majority of assets in Australia, the fund is heavily exposed to economic and market conditions in a single country.
Heavy Tilt Toward Financials
Nearly half of the portfolio is in financial stocks, which increases the fund’s sensitivity to interest rates, credit conditions, and banking-sector stress.
Moderately High Expense Ratio
The fund’s ongoing fee is higher than many broad-market ETFs, which can modestly reduce long-term returns for buy-and-hold investors.
EPP vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM2.07B
RegionAsia-Pacific
Expense Ratio0.47%
Beta0.78
IssueriShares
Inception DateOct 25, 2001
Dividend Yield3.47%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedMSCI Pacific ex JP
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume378,012
30 Day Avg. Volume420,587
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
59.48Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering93
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
EPP Summary
The iShares MSCI Pacific ex-Japan ETF (EPP) tracks the MSCI Pacific ex-Japan Index, giving you broad exposure to stocks from Australia, Hong Kong, Singapore, and New Zealand while leaving out Japan. It holds many types of companies, with a big focus on banks and financial firms, plus materials and industrial businesses. Well-known holdings include Commonwealth Bank of Australia and BHP Group. An investor might choose this ETF to diversify outside the U.S. and Europe and tap into Pacific-region growth. A key risk is that it is heavily tilted toward financial stocks and can rise or fall with those markets.
How much will it cost me?The iShares MSCI Pacific ex-Japan ETF (EPP) has an expense ratio of 0.48%, which means you’ll pay $4.80 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than average for ETFs because it tracks a specific international index, which can involve more costs compared to passively managed U.S. market ETFs.
What would affect this ETF?The iShares MSCI Pacific ex-Japan ETF (EPP) could benefit from economic growth in developed Asia-Pacific countries like Australia and Singapore, particularly if sectors like financials and materials, which make up a large portion of the fund, perform well. However, potential risks include global economic slowdowns, regulatory changes in key markets, or declining commodity prices, which could negatively impact top holdings such as BHP Group and Commonwealth Bank of Australia. Additionally, fluctuations in interest rates could affect financial stocks, which are heavily weighted in this ETF.
EPP Top 10 Holdings
EPP is heavily anchored in Australia and broader developed Asia-Pacific financials, with the big Aussie banks setting the tone. Commonwealth Bank, Westpac, and NAB have been losing a bit of steam lately, acting as a mild brake on the fund, even as Singapore’s DBS and OCBC are quietly rising and helping to steady the ship. BHP and other materials names add a strong, more cyclical backbone, recently trending higher and giving the ETF some lift. Overall, this is a financials-and-resources story, with performance driven largely by a concentrated regional banking core.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BHP Group Ltd | 10.36% | $215.80M | AU$308.91B | 70.74% | 68 Neutral | |
| Commonwealth Bank of Australia | 8.51% | $177.31M | AU$261.50B | -11.06% | 64 Neutral | |
| DBS Group Holdings | 4.58% | $95.35M | S$177.89B | 43.31% | 78 Outperform | |
| AIA Group | 4.51% | $93.95M | HK$770.99B | 16.81% | 72 Outperform | |
| Westpac Banking | 3.82% | $79.56M | AU$117.85B | 19.00% | 69 Neutral | |
| National Australia Bank Limited | 3.57% | $74.44M | AU$109.15B | -7.74% | 64 Neutral | |
| ANZ Group Holdings | 3.28% | $68.30M | AU$101.82B | 26.01% | 70 Outperform | |
| Wesfarmers Limited | 3.13% | $65.13M | AU$95.72B | 7.79% | 68 Neutral | |
| Macquarie Group Limited | 2.82% | $58.68M | AU$86.21B | 23.73% | 56 Neutral | |
| OCBC | 2.70% | $56.36M | S$104.89B | 41.92% | 71 Outperform |
EPP Technical Analysis
Positive
―
Price Trends
55.24
Negative
54.75
Positive
52.59
Positive
Market Momentum
-0.35
Positive
50.61
Neutral
43.25
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For EPP, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 54.74, equal to the 50-day MA of 55.24, and equal to the 200-day MA of 52.59, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.35 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 50.61 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 43.25 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for EPP.
EPP Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
EPP
iShares MSCI Pacific ex-Japan ETF
54.82
7.07
14.81%
DXJ
WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund
―
―
―
INDA
iShares MSCI India ETF
―
―
―
MCHI
iShares MSCI China ETF
―
―
―
BBAX
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia ex-Japan ETF
―
―
―
FLJP
Franklin FTSE Japan ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents