tiprankstipranks
Trending News
More News >
Advertisement

CIL - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

CIL

VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL)

Rating:61Neutral
Price Target:
The VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL) has a balanced overall rating, reflecting a mix of strong and weaker holdings. Fortis Inc. and Hydro One stand out as key contributors due to their robust financial performance, stable revenue growth, and positive market trends, which bolster the ETF’s rating. However, holdings like Kirin Holdings and CLP Holdings present challenges, with concerns about declining cash flow and leverage, slightly weighing on the fund’s overall score. A notable risk is the ETF's exposure to companies with high leverage, which could impact stability during market downturns.
Positive Factors
Strong Top Holdings
Several of the ETF's largest positions, such as Telstra Corporation and Toronto Dominion Bank, have delivered strong year-to-date performance, supporting overall returns.
Global Diversification
The ETF has exposure to a wide range of countries, including Japan, the UK, and Canada, which helps reduce reliance on any single geographic market.
Moderate Expense Ratio
With an expense ratio of 0.45%, the fund is reasonably priced compared to many international ETFs, making it cost-effective for investors.
Negative Factors
Underperforming Holdings
Some top holdings, such as Swisscom AG and Hong Kong & China Gas Co, have shown weaker year-to-date performance, which could drag on the fund's overall returns.
Sector Concentration in Financials
The ETF has significant exposure to the financial sector, which makes it vulnerable to downturns in banking and related industries.
Small U.S. Exposure
The ETF allocates only 9.2% to U.S. companies, which may limit its ability to benefit from the strength of the U.S. market.

CIL vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

CIL Summary

The VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL) is an investment fund that focuses on large-cap companies from around the world, aiming to reduce risk by weighting stocks based on their volatility. It includes companies from countries like Japan, the UK, and Canada, and spans sectors such as financials, industrials, and consumer goods. Well-known holdings include Toronto Dominion Bank and Swisscom AG. This ETF is a good choice for investors looking to diversify internationally while managing risk. However, new investors should know that its performance can be affected by global economic conditions, which may lead to fluctuations in value.
How much will it cost me?The VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL) has an expense ratio of 0.45%, meaning you’ll pay $4.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This expense ratio is slightly higher than average because the fund uses a specialized volatility-weighted strategy, which requires more active management compared to passively managed ETFs that track broad market indexes.
What would affect this ETF?The VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL) could benefit from stable growth in developed international markets, especially if large-cap companies in sectors like financials and industrials perform well. However, global economic uncertainty, rising interest rates, or regulatory changes in key regions could negatively impact its holdings, particularly in sectors like utilities and consumer cyclical. Its focus on volatility weighting may help mitigate risks during market downturns but could limit upside potential in highly bullish conditions.

CIL Top 10 Holdings

The VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL) leans heavily on financials, with names like Toronto Dominion Bank and Bank of Nova Scotia driving recent gains thanks to strong earnings and strategic growth initiatives. Utilities, including Hydro One, have provided steady support, buoyed by stable profitability and positive market trends. However, Telstra Corporation in the communication services sector has been lagging, weighed down by declining revenue growth. The fund’s broad exposure to developed markets outside the U.S. ensures diversification, but its tilt toward financials and utilities suggests a focus on stability over high-growth sectors.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
CLP Holdings0.47%$333.47KHK$173.69B7.42%
68
Neutral
Telstra Corporation Limited0.40%$289.26KAU$55.11B26.21%
64
Neutral
Canadian Bank of Commerce0.38%$268.85KC$117.39B36.05%
77
Outperform
Bank Of Nova Scotia0.37%$266.03K$87.14B26.37%
71
Outperform
Toronto Dominion Bank0.37%$264.24K$146.95B63.03%
75
Outperform
Emera0.37%$261.79K$14.25B19.70%
73
Outperform
Hydro One0.36%$256.89KC$32.08B14.54%
75
Outperform
Fortis0.36%$256.68K$25.76B13.48%
66
Neutral
Hong Kong & China Gas Co0.36%$256.37KHK$135.47B23.15%
65
Neutral
Power Corp of Canada0.34%$246.02KC$44.52B47.34%
73
Outperform

CIL Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
51.90
Positive
100DMA
51.31
Positive
200DMA
48.89
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
0.23
Negative
RSI
60.18
Neutral
STOCH
95.85
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For CIL, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 52.20, equal to the 50-day MA of 51.90, and equal to the 200-day MA of 48.89, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.23 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 60.18 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 95.85 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for CIL.

CIL Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$71.35M0.45%
$72.92M0.80%
$58.22M0.12%
$52.93M0.24%
$48.51M0.45%
$26.01M0.35%
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
CIL
VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF
52.92
10.46
24.63%
BCIL
Bancreek International Large Cap ETF
QLVD
FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund
DEEF
Xtrackers FTSE Developed ex US Multifactor ETF
INEQ
Columbia International Equity Income Etf
CEFA
Global X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-US ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement