tiprankstipranks
Trending News
More News >
Advertisement

CIL - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

CIL

VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL)

Rating:61Neutral
Price Target:
$55.00
The overall rating of the VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL) reflects a mix of strengths and challenges among its holdings. Swisscom AG and Canadian Bank of Commerce stand out as key contributors, with strong financial performance, strategic growth initiatives, and stable outlooks supporting the fund's rating. However, holdings like CLP Holdings and Telstra Corporation face challenges such as declining cash flow and revenue growth, which may have slightly weighed on the ETF's overall score. Investors should also note the potential risks from sector concentration and leverage among several holdings.
Positive Factors
Strong Top Holdings
Several of the ETF's largest positions, such as Telstra Corporation and Toronto Dominion Bank, have delivered strong year-to-date performance, supporting overall returns.
Global Diversification
The ETF has exposure to a wide range of countries, including Japan, the UK, and Canada, which helps reduce reliance on any single geographic market.
Moderate Expense Ratio
With an expense ratio of 0.45%, the fund is reasonably priced compared to many international ETFs, making it cost-effective for investors.
Negative Factors
Underperforming Holdings
Some top holdings, such as Swisscom AG and Hong Kong & China Gas Co, have shown weaker year-to-date performance, which could drag on the fund's overall returns.
Sector Concentration in Financials
The ETF has significant exposure to the financial sector, which makes it vulnerable to downturns in banking and related industries.
Small U.S. Exposure
The ETF allocates only 9.2% to U.S. companies, which may limit its ability to benefit from the strength of the U.S. market.

CIL vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

CIL Summary

The VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL) is an investment fund that focuses on large-cap companies from around the world, aiming to reduce risk by weighting stocks based on their volatility. It includes companies from countries like Japan, the UK, and Canada, and spans sectors such as financials, industrials, and consumer goods. Well-known holdings include Toronto Dominion Bank and Swisscom AG. This ETF is a good choice for investors looking to diversify internationally while managing risk. However, new investors should know that its performance can be affected by global economic conditions, which may lead to fluctuations in value.
How much will it cost me?The VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL) has an expense ratio of 0.45%, meaning you’ll pay $4.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This expense ratio is slightly higher than average because the fund uses a specialized volatility-weighted strategy, which requires more active management compared to passively managed ETFs that track broad market indexes.
What would affect this ETF?The VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL) could benefit from stable growth in developed international markets, especially if large-cap companies in sectors like financials and industrials perform well. However, global economic uncertainty, rising interest rates, or regulatory changes in key regions could negatively impact its holdings, particularly in sectors like utilities and consumer cyclical. Its focus on volatility weighting may help mitigate risks during market downturns but could limit upside potential in highly bullish conditions.

CIL Top 10 Holdings

The VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL) leans heavily on financials, with names like Toronto Dominion Bank and Bank of Nova Scotia driving steady performance thanks to strong earnings and strategic growth initiatives. Utilities such as Hydro One and Fortis are rising, bolstered by sustainability efforts and capital investments, while Telstra Corporation in the communication sector is lagging due to declining revenue growth. The fund’s focus on developed markets outside the U.S. provides a global flavor, but its concentration in financials and utilities means its fate is tied to these sectors’ ups and downs.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
CLP Holdings0.47%$327.71KHK$170.54B-1.25%
68
Neutral
Telstra Corporation Limited0.41%$286.29KAU$55.84B25.82%
64
Neutral
Hong Kong & China Gas Co0.38%$264.39KHK$139.58B21.13%
65
Neutral
Emera0.38%$264.32K$14.38B32.54%
73
Outperform
Fortis0.37%$257.40K$25.85B16.14%
76
Outperform
Swisscom AG0.36%$251.72KCHF30.64B16.18%
74
Outperform
Canadian Bank of Commerce0.36%$249.89KC$110.35B31.70%
78
Outperform
Bank Of Nova Scotia0.36%$248.77K$82.25B23.68%
71
Outperform
Hydro One0.36%$247.44KC$31.25B16.14%
71
Outperform
Toronto Dominion Bank0.35%$247.01K$137.98B42.78%
75
Outperform

CIL Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
51.56
Positive
100DMA
50.81
Positive
200DMA
48.04
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
0.06
Positive
RSI
49.94
Neutral
STOCH
22.93
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For CIL, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 51.85, equal to the 50-day MA of 51.56, and equal to the 200-day MA of 48.04, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of 0.06 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 49.94 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 22.93 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for CIL.

CIL Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$69.90M0.45%
61
Neutral
$72.47M0.80%
70
Neutral
$60.18M0.12%
68
Neutral
$51.76M0.24%
59
Neutral
$43.17M0.45%
69
Neutral
$25.75M0.35%
66
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
CIL
VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF
51.74
9.38
22.14%
BCIL
Bancreek International Large Cap ETF
QLVD
FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund
DEEF
Xtrackers FTSE Developed ex US Multifactor ETF
INEQ
Columbia International Equity Income Etf
CEFA
Global X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-US ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement