tiprankstipranks
Trending News
More News >
Advertisement

CEFA - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

CEFA

Global X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-US ETF (CEFA)

Rating:66Neutral
Price Target:
CEFA, the Global X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-US ETF, earns a solid overall rating, mainly driven by high-quality global leaders like Toyota and HSBC, which show strong financial health, positive earnings calls, and supportive technical trends. Other major holdings such as ASML, CSL, and Mitsubishi UFJ also add strength through robust profitability and generally reasonable valuations, though some names like SAP and Unilever face bearish or mixed technical signals and valuation concerns that slightly weigh on the fund. The main risk is its concentration in large developed-market companies outside the U.S., where regional challenges or overvaluation in certain stocks could impact performance.
Positive Factors
Broad International Diversification
The fund spreads its investments across many developed markets outside the U.S., which helps reduce the impact of problems in any single country.
Balanced Sector Mix
Holdings are spread across financials, industrials, technology, health care, and other sectors, helping to avoid relying too heavily on one part of the economy.
Strong Contribution from Key Holdings
Several of the largest positions, such as ASML, Toyota, and Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, have shown strong performance, supporting the ETF’s recent gains.
Negative Factors
Heavy Tilt Toward Financials
A large share of the portfolio is in financial stocks, which can make the fund more sensitive to banking and interest-rate risks.
Mixed Performance Among Top Holdings
Some major positions like EssilorLuxottica, Unilever, and SAP have shown weaker recent performance, which can drag on overall returns.
Moderate Expense Ratio
The fund’s fee is not especially low for an ETF, which slightly reduces the net return investors keep over time.

CEFA vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

CEFA Summary

CEFA is an ETF that follows the S&P Developed ex-U.S. Catholic Values Index, investing in large, well-known companies outside the United States while screening out businesses that conflict with Catholic values, such as weapons and tobacco. It holds global leaders like Toyota and Unilever, giving investors broad international diversification across many countries and sectors. Someone might invest in CEFA to seek long-term growth while aligning their money with their ethical or religious beliefs. A key risk is that its value can go up and down with global stock markets and may lag funds that do not use these value-based screens.
How much will it cost me?The Global X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-US ETF (CEFA) has an expense ratio of 0.35%, which means you’ll pay $3.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than average because it is a passively managed fund with a niche focus on ethical investing, which can involve additional screening costs. Overall, it balances values-based investing with international diversification.
What would affect this ETF?CEFA's focus on developed markets outside the U.S. and its exposure to sectors like financials, technology, and consumer cyclical could benefit from global economic growth and innovation trends. However, its exclusion of certain industries based on Catholic values may limit diversification and could be negatively impacted by regional economic slowdowns or regulatory changes in key markets. The performance of top holdings like ASML and Toyota Motor will also play a significant role in influencing the ETF's future returns.

CEFA Top 10 Holdings

This Catholic values fund leans heavily on developed markets outside the U.S., with a noticeable tilt toward financials and industrials. ASML is one of the main engines, with its rising share price helping to pull overall returns higher, while Siemens and Toyota add steady support from Europe and Japan. Big banks like HSBC and Mitsubishi UFJ are also pushing the fund forward as financials gain momentum. On the flip side, consumer giant Unilever and software leader SAP have been losing steam lately, acting as mild brakes on performance.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
ASML Holding NV3.01%$952.01K€435.69B61.23%
76
Outperform
EssilorLuxottica SA1.98%$625.75K€120.42B-3.62%
68
Neutral
Siemens1.75%$553.72K€188.82B17.68%
74
Outperform
Toyota Motor1.67%$527.13K¥48.55T27.64%
80
Outperform
HSBC Holdings1.66%$523.90K£224.58B50.66%
80
Outperform
Unilever1.38%$436.51K£112.92B0.01%
72
Outperform
CSL1.36%$429.37KAU$88.15B-27.72%
75
Outperform
HOYA1.35%$426.05K¥9.26T34.72%
74
Outperform
Schneider Electric1.23%$390.17K€139.34B4.86%
62
Neutral
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group1.21%$381.94K¥32.98T41.02%
76
Outperform

CEFA Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
37.36
Positive
100DMA
36.53
Positive
200DMA
35.03
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
0.49
Positive
RSI
56.64
Neutral
STOCH
57.17
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For CEFA, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 38.42, equal to the 50-day MA of 37.36, and equal to the 200-day MA of 35.03, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.49 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 56.64 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 57.17 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for CEFA.

CEFA Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$31.63M0.35%
$76.29M0.80%
$60.71M0.12%
$55.84M0.24%
$54.38M0.45%
$43.77M0.48%
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
CEFA
Global X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-US ETF
38.66
7.88
25.60%
BCIL
Bancreek International Large Cap ETF
QLVD
FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund
DEEF
Xtrackers FTSE Developed ex US Multifactor ETF
INEQ
Columbia International Equity Income Etf
OEFA
O'Shares International Developed Quality Dividend ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement