tiprankstipranks
Trending News
More News >
Advertisement

OEFA - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

OEFA

O'Shares International Developed Quality Dividend ETF (OEFA)

Rating:68Neutral
Price Target:
OEFA, the O'Shares International Developed Quality Dividend ETF, has a solid overall rating driven mainly by high-quality leaders like ASML, HSBC, and Novartis, which show strong financial performance, healthy profitability, and generally supportive technical trends. These strengths are partly offset by holdings such as Iberdrola, SAP, Atlas Copco, and Safran, where issues like high debt, potential overvaluation, weaker momentum, or profitability challenges temper the fund’s appeal. The main risk factor is that several key holdings show signs of being expensive or overbought, which could limit future upside if market conditions change.
Positive Factors
Solid Recent Performance
The ETF has shown steady gains so far this year and in recent months, indicating generally positive momentum.
Global Diversification Across Developed Markets
Holdings spread across countries like Japan, the UK, France, Switzerland, and others help reduce reliance on any single market.
Quality Large-Cap Leaders in Top Holdings
Several major companies in the top positions, such as ASML, Novartis, Roche, and Siemens, have delivered strong year-to-date performance that supports the fund’s returns.
Negative Factors
Moderate Expense Ratio
The fund’s fee is not especially low, which slightly reduces the net return investors keep over time.
Sector Concentration in Industrials
A large tilt toward industrials means the ETF could be more affected if that sector experiences a downturn.
Mixed Performance Among Top Holdings
Some sizable positions, including Nestlé, Iberdrola, and SAP, have shown weak or negative year-to-date performance, which can drag on overall results.

OEFA vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

OEFA Summary

O'Shares International Developed Quality Dividend ETF (OEFA) tracks the O'Shares International Developed Quality Dividend Index, focusing on large, financially strong companies in developed countries outside the U.S. It holds well-known names like Nestlé and Novartis, and invests across many sectors, including industrials, health care, and technology, with major exposure to Europe and Japan. Someone might consider this ETF for international diversification and a focus on steady dividend payers that can provide income plus potential growth. A key risk is that its value can rise or fall with global stock markets and foreign economies.
How much will it cost me?The expense ratio for the O'Shares International Developed Quality Dividend ETF (OEFA) is 0.48%, which means you’ll pay $4.80 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than average because the fund is actively managed to focus on high-quality, dividend-paying companies in developed markets outside the U.S.
What would affect this ETF?This ETF, focused on developed European markets and large-cap dividend-paying companies, could benefit from stable economic growth in Europe, increased demand for high-quality dividend stocks, and advancements in sectors like technology and healthcare, which are among its top holdings. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, which can make dividend-paying stocks less attractive, or economic uncertainty in Europe that could impact industrial and financial sectors heavily represented in the ETF. Regulatory changes or geopolitical tensions in Europe could also negatively affect its performance.

OEFA Top 10 Holdings

This ETF leans heavily on Europe’s industrial and healthcare champions, with ASML, Siemens, Roche, and Atlas Copco doing much of the heavy lifting as their shares have been rising and adding momentum to returns. Financial giant HSBC and drugmaker Novartis are also pulling their weight with steady gains. On the flip side, consumer staple Nestlé and software leader SAP are losing steam, acting as mild brakes on performance. Overall, it’s a developed-markets ex-U.S. play, tilted toward European blue chips rather than U.S. tech titans.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
ASML Holding NV5.64%$2.52M€455.71B66.74%
76
Outperform
HSBC Holdings3.65%$1.63M£224.31B48.12%
80
Outperform
Novartis AG3.57%$1.59MCHF230.29B23.72%
80
Outperform
Roche Holding AG3.12%$1.39MCHF280.54B43.37%
73
Outperform
Nestlé SA3.10%$1.39MCHF199.61B19.19%
71
Outperform
Iberdrola3.05%$1.36M€130.85B46.50%
67
Neutral
Siemens3.01%$1.34M€201.39B20.73%
74
Outperform
ABB Ltd2.94%$1.31Mkr1.44T35.41%
78
Outperform
Commonwealth Bank of Australia2.84%$1.27MAU$265.38B-4.36%
64
Neutral
Schneider Electric2.77%$1.24M€144.95B7.78%
62
Neutral

OEFA Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
33.77
Positive
100DMA
33.37
Positive
200DMA
32.76
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
0.25
Negative
RSI
63.16
Neutral
STOCH
97.49
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For OEFA, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 34.35, equal to the 50-day MA of 33.77, and equal to the 200-day MA of 32.76, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.25 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 63.16 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 97.49 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for OEFA.

OEFA Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$44.41M0.48%
$61.78M0.12%
$56.27M0.24%
$54.38M0.45%
$23.44M0.29%
$16.00M0.55%
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
OEFA
O'Shares International Developed Quality Dividend ETF
35.20
5.63
19.04%
QLVD
FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund
DEEF
Xtrackers FTSE Developed ex US Multifactor ETF
INEQ
Columbia International Equity Income Etf
STXI
Strive International Developed Markets ETF
FFDI
Fidelity Fundamental Developed International ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement