tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

OEFA - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

OEFA

O'Shares International Developed Quality Dividend ETF (OEFA)

Rating:67Neutral
Price Target:
OEFA’s rating suggests it is a solid but not top-tier international dividend ETF, supported by high-quality leaders like ASML, HSBC, Novartis, and Roche, which bring strong financial performance, positive earnings outlooks, and in some cases solid dividends and growth pipelines. However, some holdings such as Commonwealth Bank of Australia and Schneider Electric face bearish technical trends, valuation concerns, or leverage and cash flow issues, and the fund’s focus on developed international markets and several large industrial and financial names means investors should be aware of sector and regional concentration risks.
Positive Factors
Strong Leading Holdings
Several of the largest positions, including ASML and other major international companies, have shown strong performance this year, helping support the ETF’s returns.
Broad International Diversification
The fund spreads its investments across many developed countries such as Japan, France, the UK, and others, which helps reduce the impact of problems in any single market.
Balanced Sector Mix
Holdings are spread across multiple sectors like industrials, financials, health care, and consumer companies, which can help smooth out returns when one area of the market struggles.
Negative Factors
Recent Weak Overall Performance
Despite some strong individual stocks, the ETF’s returns over the year so far and the last three months have been weak, which may concern investors looking for steady growth.
Moderately High Expense Ratio
The fund’s expense ratio is on the higher side for an ETF, which means more of the returns are used to cover fees instead of going to investors.
Mixed Results Among Top Holdings
A few of the largest positions, such as Nestlé and Roche, have shown weaker performance this year, which can drag on the fund’s overall results.

OEFA vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

OEFA Summary

O'Shares International Developed Quality Dividend ETF (OEFA) tracks the O'Shares International Developed Quality Dividend Index, focusing on established companies in developed countries that pay steady dividends. It holds well-known names like Nestlé, HSBC, and Novartis, giving you exposure to many sectors and regions such as Europe, Japan, and Australia in a single investment. Someone might invest in this ETF to diversify beyond the U.S. and seek a mix of income from dividends and potential long-term growth. A key risk is that international stock prices and currency values can go up and down, which can affect your returns.
How much will it cost me?The expense ratio for the O'Shares International Developed Quality Dividend ETF (OEFA) is 0.48%, which means you’ll pay $4.80 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than average because the fund is actively managed to focus on high-quality, dividend-paying companies in developed markets outside the U.S.
What would affect this ETF?This ETF, focused on developed European markets and large-cap dividend-paying companies, could benefit from stable economic growth in Europe, increased demand for high-quality dividend stocks, and advancements in sectors like technology and healthcare, which are among its top holdings. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, which can make dividend-paying stocks less attractive, or economic uncertainty in Europe that could impact industrial and financial sectors heavily represented in the ETF. Regulatory changes or geopolitical tensions in Europe could also negatively affect its performance.

OEFA Top 10 Holdings

This dividend-focused international ETF leans heavily on European industrial and healthcare champions, with ASML, ABB, and Siemens doing much of the heavy lifting as their shares continue to rise and set the tone for the fund. HSBC adds a steady financial backbone, while Iberdrola offers a more mixed, stop-and-go contribution from the utilities side. On the flip side, consumer giant Nestlé has been losing a bit of steam lately, slightly dragging on returns. Overall, the fund is broadly diversified across developed markets outside the U.S., but its story is driven by Europe’s blue-chip names.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
ASML Holding NV6.88%$2.38M€558.54B126.15%
76
Outperform
HSBC Holdings3.87%$1.34M£233.83B53.55%
80
Outperform
ABB Ltd3.53%$1.22MCHF149.34B75.09%
78
Outperform
Novartis AG3.43%$1.19MCHF215.38B21.53%
80
Outperform
Siemens3.17%$1.10M€204.90B23.21%
74
Outperform
Nestlé SA3.06%$1.06MCHF197.96B-7.64%
71
Outperform
Iberdrola3.05%$1.06M€132.59B24.07%
67
Neutral
Roche Holding AG2.88%$997.26KCHF260.79B26.36%
73
Outperform
Keyence2.81%$974.72K$118.19B24.49%
81
Outperform
Schneider Electric2.81%$974.32K€151.54B23.52%
62
Neutral

OEFA Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
33.16
Positive
100DMA
33.39
Positive
200DMA
33.10
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
0.18
Positive
RSI
52.59
Neutral
STOCH
21.33
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For OEFA, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 33.55, equal to the 50-day MA of 33.16, and equal to the 200-day MA of 33.10, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.18 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 52.59 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 21.33 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for OEFA.

OEFA Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$34.65M0.48%
67
Neutral
$79.24M0.45%
68
Neutral
$55.49M0.24%
57
Neutral
$52.57M0.12%
68
Neutral
$32.05M0.08%
60
Neutral
$22.57M0.55%
65
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
OEFA
O'Shares International Developed Quality Dividend ETF
33.72
1.28
3.95%
INEQ
Columbia International Equity Income Etf
DEEF
Xtrackers FTSE Developed ex US Multifactor ETF
QLVD
FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund
VDG
Vanguard Developed Markets ex-US Growth Index ETF
FFDI
Fidelity Fundamental Developed International ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement