SRHQ - ETF AI Analysis

Top Page

SRH U.S. Quality ETF (SRHQ)

Rating:70Outperform

Price Target:―

SRHQ, the SRH U.S. Quality ETF, has a solid overall rating, supported by strong holdings like EnerSys, Watts Water Technologies, and The New York Times Company, which all show healthy financial performance, positive earnings commentary, and generally supportive technical trends despite some valuation concerns. The fund also benefits from quality names like Ciena and Arcosa that have growth drivers and bullish momentum, though risks such as high P/E ratios, leverage, and occasional bearish or overbought technical signals in several holdings slightly temper the overall picture. The main risk factor is that many top positions share similar valuation and leverage concerns, which could weigh on returns if market conditions turn against higher-priced or more indebted companies.

Positive Factors

Strong Top Holdings

Most of the largest positions have shown solid gains this year, helping support the ETF’s overall performance.

Sector Diversification Across the U.S. Economy

Holdings spread across technology, industrials, health care, consumer, and other sectors help reduce the impact of weakness in any single industry.

Growing, Mid-Sized Fund

With a meaningful but not oversized asset base, the ETF is large enough to be established while still being focused on its quality strategy.

Negative Factors

High U.S.-Only Concentration

Almost all assets are invested in U.S. companies, offering little geographic diversification if the U.S. market struggles.

Moderate Expense Ratio

The fund’s fee is not especially low for an ETF, which slightly reduces the net return investors keep over time.

Heavy Tilt Toward Technology and Industrials

A large share of the portfolio is in technology and industrial stocks, which could hurt results if these sectors face a downturn.

SRHQ vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

AUM182.24M

RegionNorth America

Expense Ratio0.35%

Beta0.85

IssuerSRH

Inception DateOct 05, 2022

Dividend Yield0.73%

Asset ClassEquity

Index TrackedSRH U.S. Quality GARP Index - Benchmark TR Gross

Share Statistics

EPS (TTM)N/A

Shares OutstandingN/A

10 Day Avg. Volume54

30 Day Avg. Volume119

Financial Highlights & Ratios

PEG RatioN/A

Price to Book (P/B)N/A

Price to Sales (P/S)N/A

P/FCF RatioN/A

Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A

Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A

Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A

Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A

Forecast

1Y Price Target

46.36

Price Target Upside― Downside

Rating ConsensusModerate Buy

Number of Analyst Covering60

EPS Forecast (FY)N/A

Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A

SRHQ Summary

SRH U.S. Quality ETF (SRHQ) is a U.S. stock fund that follows the SRH U.S. Quality GARP Index, focusing on large, financially strong companies. It invests across many sectors, with a tilt toward technology, industrials, and health care. While its top holdings include names like Ciena and Cardinal Health, the fund holds a broad mix of U.S. businesses. Someone might invest in SRHQ for diversified exposure to higher-quality large companies that aim for steady, long-term growth. A key risk is that it still moves with the overall stock market and can lose value during market downturns.

How much will it cost me?The SRH U.S. Quality ETF (SRHQ) has an expense ratio of 0.35%, which means you’ll pay $3.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than the average for ETFs because it is actively managed, focusing on selecting high-quality large-cap companies rather than simply tracking an index.

What would affect this ETF?The SRH U.S. Quality ETF (SRHQ), with its focus on large-cap U.S. companies in sectors like Technology, Industrials, and Health Care, could benefit from economic growth, technological innovation, and increased demand for healthcare services. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, which can impact large-cap companies' borrowing costs, or sector-specific risks such as regulatory changes in technology and healthcare. Its emphasis on quality companies provides resilience, but broader market volatility could still affect performance.

SRHQ Top 10 Holdings

SRHQ is leaning heavily into U.S. tech and industrial “workhorses,” with Ciena setting the pace as a clear leader, rising on strong growth expectations and strategic deals. EMCOR Group and Jabil are also pulling their weight, adding steady momentum despite some worries about rich valuations. EnerSys and Arcosa provide a solid industrial backbone, contributing quietly but positively. On the softer side, Polaris has been lagging a bit, acting as a small drag. Overall, this is a U.S.-only, quality-focused fund, concentrated in tech and industrial names that are mostly pushing performance forward.

Name	Company Name	Weight %	Market Value	Market Cap	Yearly Gain	Overall Rating
CIEN	Ciena	8.52%	$15.27M	$43.99B	328.74%	70 Outperform
EME	EMCOR Group	3.26%	$5.84M	$35.05B	106.08%	73 Outperform
JBL	Jabil	2.87%	$5.14M	$27.51B	64.22%	73 Outperform
ENS	EnerSys	2.73%	$4.89M	$6.48B	65.80%	79 Outperform
KEYS	Keysight Technologies	2.44%	$4.38M	$41.14B	41.23%	77 Outperform
CAH	Cardinal Health	2.44%	$4.37M	$52.94B	76.26%	66 Neutral
WTS	Watts Water Technologies	2.37%	$4.25M	$10.99B	52.25%	77 Outperform
ACA	Arcosa	2.37%	$4.25M	$6.04B	32.90%	71 Outperform
PLXS	Plexus	2.30%	$4.12M	$5.28B	44.99%	75 Outperform
PII	Polaris	2.27%	$4.07M	$3.76B	35.26%	61 Neutral

SRHQ Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment

Neutral

Last Price―

Price Trends

50DMA

40.55

Positive

100DMA

39.62

Positive

200DMA

38.44

Positive

Market Momentum

MACD

0.15

Negative

RSI

49.16

Neutral

STOCH

72.38

Neutral

Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For SRHQ, the sentiment is Neutral. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 40.74, equal to the 50-day MA of 40.55, and equal to the 200-day MA of 38.44, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of 0.15 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 49.16 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 72.38 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Neutral sentiment for SRHQ.

SRHQ Peer Comparison

Comparison Results

Name	Price	Price Target	AUM	Expense Ratio	Overall Rating
SRHQ	―	―	$182.24M	0.35%	70 Outperform
EFIV	―	―	$997.15M	0.10%	75 Outperform
VOTE	―	―	$955.59M	0.05%	74 Outperform
QQQJ	―	―	$899.07M	0.15%	68 Neutral
NBCR	―	―	$886.60M	0.29%	73 Outperform
ONEY	―	―	$859.35M	0.20%	69 Neutral

Performance Comparison

SRHQ

SRH U.S. Quality ETF

40.67

3.83

10.40%

EFIV

SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF

―

VOTE

Engine No. 1 Transform 500 ETF

―

QQQJ

Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF

―

NBCR

Neuberger Berman Core Equity ETF

―

ONEY

SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF

―

Glossary

BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―

Table of Contents