Education
About Us
Working with TipRanks
Follow Us
PWER - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Macquarie Energy Transition ETF (PWER)
Rating:65Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Performance
The ETF has shown solid gains over the past month, three months, and year-to-date, indicating positive recent momentum.
Leading Holdings Showing Strength
Several of the largest positions, such as Hudbay Minerals, Wheaton Precious Metals, and Alcoa, have delivered strong year-to-date performance that supports the fund’s returns.
Global Exposure Within a U.S.-Focused Portfolio
While most assets are in U.S. companies, the fund also includes meaningful exposure to the UK, Canada, and France, adding some international diversification.
Negative Factors
High Sector Concentration in Materials and Energy
With most assets in the Materials and Energy sectors, the fund is heavily exposed to commodity and energy price swings rather than being broadly diversified across the market.
Notable Lagging Holdings
Some key positions, including First Solar and ARC Resources, have shown weak year-to-date performance, which can drag on overall returns if the trend continues.
Relatively High Expense Ratio
The fund’s expense ratio is on the higher side for an ETF, which means more of the investment return is used to cover fees.
PWER vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM10.02M
RegionGlobal
Expense Ratio0.80%
Beta0.92
IssuerNomura
Inception DateNov 28, 2023
Dividend Yield1.22%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedNo Underlying Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume824
30 Day Avg. Volume1,274
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
42.75Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering34
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
PWER Summary
The Macquarie Energy Transition ETF (PWER) is a themed fund that focuses on the shift to cleaner, low‑carbon energy rather than tracking a traditional index. It invests mainly in U.S. and global companies involved in materials, energy, and industrials that support renewable power, energy storage, and more efficient use of resources. Well-known holdings include First Solar and Alcoa. Someone might invest in PWER to seek long-term growth while supporting the move toward cleaner energy. A key risk is that it is concentrated in a specific theme, so its price can swing more than the overall market.
How much will it cost me?The Macquarie Energy Transition ETF (Ticker: PWER) has an expense ratio of 0.8%, meaning you’ll pay $8 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because the fund is actively managed, focusing on a specialized niche in the low-carbon energy transition sector, which requires more research and management effort.
What would affect this ETF?The Macquarie Energy Transition ETF (PWER) could benefit from global efforts to combat climate change and increasing investments in renewable energy, clean technology, and sustainable infrastructure, as governments and corporations prioritize decarbonization. However, potential risks include fluctuating commodity prices in the materials and energy sectors, regulatory changes, and economic slowdowns that could impact funding for green initiatives or the adoption of new technologies.
PWER Top 10 Holdings
PWER is leaning heavily into materials and traditional energy names, with miners like Hudbay Minerals and Ero Copper setting the tone. Hudbay has been rising and looks like one of the fund’s key engines, while Ero’s more mixed, recently losing a bit of steam despite earlier gains. Steel Dynamics and CF Industries are also pulling their weight, adding steady momentum. On the flip side, First Solar has been lagging this year, acting as a bit of a brake on returns. Overall, it’s a globally focused, commodity-tilted play on the energy transition rather than a pure clean-tech bet.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hudbay Minerals | 5.30% | $531.14K | $8.92B | 240.91% | 76 Outperform | |
| Ero Copper | 5.20% | $520.71K | $2.94B | 138.58% | 76 Outperform | |
| Steel Dynamics | 5.01% | $501.85K | $26.42B | 52.73% | 76 Outperform | |
| Alcoa | 4.62% | $463.04K | $16.14B | 97.42% | 76 Outperform | |
| Cf Industries Holdings | 4.11% | $411.51K | $17.06B | 44.02% | 72 Outperform | |
| Conocophillips | 3.96% | $396.73K | $143.05B | 25.97% | 78 Outperform | |
| Wheaton Precious Metals | 3.87% | $388.22K | $67.14B | 112.27% | ― | |
| Valero Energy | 3.77% | $377.48K | $64.57B | 70.31% | 69 Neutral | |
| First Solar | 3.69% | $369.46K | $20.97B | 46.78% | 75 Outperform | |
| Valterra Platinum Limited | 3.55% | $356.09K | £18.93B | 153.85% | ― |
PWER Technical Analysis
Neutral
―
Price Trends
38.64
Positive
36.08
Positive
32.85
Positive
Market Momentum
0.35
Positive
48.70
Neutral
15.93
Positive
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For PWER, the sentiment is Neutral. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 40.31, equal to the 50-day MA of 38.64, and equal to the 200-day MA of 32.85, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of 0.35 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 48.70 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 15.93 is Positive, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Neutral sentiment for PWER.
PWER Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
PWER
Macquarie Energy Transition ETF
39.60
15.03
61.17%
FFND
Future Fund Active ETF
―
―
―
AIFD
TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF
―
―
―
YNOT
Horizon Digital Frontier ETF
―
―
―
CSNR
Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF
―
―
―
TCAI
Tortoise AI Infrastructure ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
Disclaimer
This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents