tiprankstipranks
Trending News
More News >
Advertisement

GSID - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

GSID

Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF (GSID)

Rating:66Neutral
Price Target:
GSID, the Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF, has a solid overall rating driven by high-quality global leaders like Novartis, AstraZeneca, HSBC, and Toyota, which all show strong financial health, positive earnings commentary, and generally supportive valuations or technical trends. These strengths are partly offset by holdings such as Commonwealth Bank of Australia and SAP, where bearish technical signals, valuation concerns, and leverage or cash flow issues introduce some risk. The main risk factor is that several key positions face valuation and technical pressures at the same time, which can increase volatility even though the underlying businesses are generally strong.
Positive Factors
Broad International Diversification
The fund spreads its investments across many countries, including Japan, the UK, and several European and Asia-Pacific markets, which helps reduce reliance on any single economy.
Balanced Sector Mix
Holdings are spread across financials, industrials, health care, technology, and other sectors, helping to cushion the impact if one industry runs into trouble.
Competitive Expense Ratio
The fund’s relatively low expense ratio means less of your return is lost to fees compared with many actively managed international funds.
Negative Factors
Heavy Financials Exposure
A large allocation to financial companies makes the fund more sensitive to banking and interest-rate risks.
Concentration in a Few Countries
Significant weight in markets like Japan and the UK means the fund’s performance can be heavily influenced by economic or political developments in those countries.
Mixed Performance Among Top Holdings
While some leading positions have shown strong gains, others have been weak or lagging, which can create uneven contributions to overall returns.

GSID vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

GSID Summary

The Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF (GSID) is an exchange-traded fund that tracks the Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid Cap Index. It invests in many large and mid-sized companies outside the U.S., with big exposure to countries like Japan, the UK, and France. Well-known holdings include Toyota Motor, Nestlé, and AstraZeneca. Someone might invest in GSID to diversify beyond the U.S. and gain broad international stock market exposure in a single fund. A key risk is that international stock prices can go up and down significantly with global market and currency moves.
How much will it cost me?The Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF (GSID) has an expense ratio of 0.20%, which means you’ll pay $2 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is lower than average for ETFs because it is passively managed, tracking an index rather than relying on active management strategies.
What would affect this ETF?Positive drivers for GSID could include strong growth in developed markets outside North America, particularly in sectors like financials and industrials, which make up a significant portion of the ETF's holdings. However, negative factors such as rising interest rates or economic slowdowns in these regions could impact corporate earnings and investor sentiment, especially for top holdings like ASML and Nestlé. Additionally, regulatory changes in key countries or global trade tensions could create uncertainty for the ETF's performance.

GSID Top 10 Holdings

GSID leans heavily into non-U.S. blue chips, with Europe and Japan doing most of the heavy lifting. ASML has been a star, rising strongly and giving the fund a powerful tech engine, while Toyota and Mitsubishi UFJ add steady support from Japan’s industrial and financial hubs. The real backbone, though, is health care: Roche, Novartis, and AstraZeneca have all been climbing, turning pharma into a key performance driver. Nestlé and Shell are more steady than exciting, and Siemens has been a bit mixed lately, occasionally tapping the brakes on returns.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
ASML Holding NV2.49%$24.92M€454.94B77.87%
76
Outperform
Novartis AG1.39%$13.91MCHF227.43B23.72%
80
Outperform
Roche Holding AG1.36%$13.65M$317.10B14.86%
73
Outperform
AstraZeneca1.36%$13.62M$294.03B21.58%
80
Outperform
HSBC Holdings1.30%$13.05M£207.68B34.99%
80
Outperform
Nestlé SA1.25%$12.51MCHF197.20B-1.46%
71
Outperform
Shell (UK)1.23%$12.36M£194.90B26.29%
73
Outperform
Toyota Motor1.05%$10.51M¥44.37T17.98%
80
Outperform
Commonwealth Bank of Australia0.98%$9.83MAU$296.06B23.36%
64
Neutral
SAP SE0.92%$9.25M€183.81B-34.51%
66
Neutral

GSID Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Negative
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
73.02
Negative
100DMA
70.38
Negative
200DMA
67.36
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
-0.92
Positive
RSI
37.01
Neutral
STOCH
34.31
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For GSID, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 73.07, equal to the 50-day MA of 73.02, and equal to the 200-day MA of 67.36, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.92 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 37.01 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 34.31 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for GSID.

GSID Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$1.00B0.20%
66
Neutral
$9.85B0.24%
68
Neutral
$8.33B0.35%
65
Neutral
$7.98B0.28%
66
Neutral
$5.98B0.07%
67
Neutral
$5.39B0.20%
61
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
GSID
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF
70.02
11.10
18.84%
JIRE
JPMorgan International Research Enhanced Equity ETF
DBEF
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF
FENI
Fidelity Enhanced International ETF
BBIN
JPMorgan BetaBuilders International Equity ETF
EFAV
iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement