Breakdown | ||||
Dec 2024 | Dec 2023 | Dec 2022 | Dec 2021 | Dec 2020 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Income Statement | Total Revenue | |||
85.09M | 93.78M | 100.96M | 91.22M | 71.85M | Gross Profit |
41.07M | 44.41M | 50.71M | 52.85M | 41.93M | EBIT |
-86.68M | -111.38M | -87.08M | -61.04M | -17.74M | EBITDA |
-86.68M | -98.46M | -23.35M | 5.65M | -15.94M | Net Income Common Stockholders |
-85.57M | -103.57M | -25.39M | 3.85M | -17.98M |
Balance Sheet | Cash, Cash Equivalents and Short-Term Investments | |||
53.63M | 116.85M | 167.88M | 288.60M | 58.72M | Total Assets |
168.92M | 247.95M | 345.89M | 337.31M | 89.60M | Total Debt |
32.64M | 43.14M | 48.63M | 0.00 | 5.02M | Net Debt |
-20.98M | -73.72M | -75.61M | -288.60M | -53.69M | Total Liabilities |
82.41M | 86.34M | 93.39M | 93.14M | 165.07M | Stockholders Equity |
86.50M | 161.61M | 252.50M | 244.17M | -75.47M |
Cash Flow | Free Cash Flow | |||
-62.71M | -52.49M | -84.94M | -49.49M | -7.10M | Operating Cash Flow |
-61.28M | -48.90M | -73.52M | -45.70M | -6.46M | Investing Cash Flow |
-1.43M | 42.10M | -90.90M | -3.79M | -522.00K | Financing Cash Flow |
-1.16M | -520.00K | 1.55M | 279.38M | 5.93M |
Name | Overall Rating | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | ROE | Dividend Yield | Revenue Growth | EPS Growth |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
75 Outperform | $168.07M | 17.79 | 36.41% | ― | 5.18% | ― | |
70 Outperform | $75.71M | 25.19 | -0.10% | ― | 5.19% | -101.31% | |
60 Neutral | $11.62B | 10.48 | -7.27% | 2.93% | 7.46% | -10.64% | |
56 Neutral | $90.81M | ― | -10.88% | ― | -2.06% | -22.58% | |
49 Neutral | $98.34M | ― | -68.97% | ― | -9.27% | 19.30% | |
48 Neutral | $113.13M | ― | -121.54% | ― | 17.97% | 21.12% |
Markforged Holding Company announced the completion of a merger, resulting in significant changes to its corporate structure and stockholder rights. As of the effective time of the merger, all outstanding shares of common stock were converted to cash, and trading on the New York Stock Exchange was suspended. The merger led to the resignation of several board members and executives, including the CEO and CFO, and the appointment of new directors. The company’s certificate of incorporation and bylaws were also amended.
Spark’s Take on MKFG Stock
According to Spark, TipRanks’ AI Analyst, MKFG is a Neutral.
Markforged Holding is facing significant financial challenges with declining revenue and negative cash flow, impacting its financial performance score negatively. However, technical analysis indicates strong upward momentum, which supports a more favorable short-term outlook. The valuation remains a concern due to negative earnings, but the potential for growth could attract speculative investors. Overall, while current financial health is weak, technical indicators provide some optimism for price performance.
To see Spark’s full report on MKFG stock, click here.
Markforged Holding Corporation announced an anticipated merger with Nano US II, Inc., a subsidiary of Nano Dimension Ltd., set to close following the Agreement and Plan of Merger dated September 25, 2024. The merger will result in Markforged becoming a wholly-owned subsidiary of Nano USA, and its removal from the NYSE. Stockholders are advised to provide specific tax documentation to avoid Israeli withholding tax on merger considerations, highlighting the merger’s significant operational and financial implications for stakeholders.
Spark’s Take on MKFG Stock
According to Spark, TipRanks’ AI Analyst, MKFG is a Neutral.
Markforged Holding faces significant financial and operational challenges, with declining revenues, high leverage, and negative cash flow impacting profitability. Despite positive technical momentum, the stock is overbought, and the negative P/E ratio highlights valuation concerns. A pending legal challenge related to a merger further adds uncertainty, weighing down the overall score.
To see Spark’s full report on MKFG stock, click here.
On February 4, 2025, Stephen Karp informed Markforged Holding Corporation’s Board of Directors of his resignation as General Counsel, effective March 3, 2025, to pursue an opportunity outside the company. His resignation was not due to any disagreements with the company’s operations, management, or policies.