| Breakdown | TTM | Dec 2024 | Dec 2023 | Dec 2022 | Dec 2021 | Jun 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Income Statement | ||||||
| Total Revenue | 1.38B | 1.69B | 2.13B | 1.57B | 1.73B | 1.46B |
| Gross Profit | 39.76M | 49.71M | 64.87M | 88.26M | 119.34M | 155.25M |
| EBITDA | 10.76M | 1.58M | 77.56M | -7.14M | -433.83M | -3.87B |
| Net Income | 58.36M | 85.07M | 91.29M | 18.64M | -275.40M | -3.72B |
Balance Sheet | ||||||
| Total Assets | 4.92B | 4.45B | 5.09B | 5.22B | 5.24B | 5.47B |
| Cash, Cash Equivalents and Short-Term Investments | 399.68M | 360.37M | 401.43M | 570.24M | 767.77M | 759.49M |
| Total Debt | 2.58B | 2.35B | 2.73B | 2.79B | 3.60B | 3.53B |
| Total Liabilities | 3.26B | 2.97B | 3.46B | 3.66B | 4.54B | 4.66B |
| Stockholders Equity | 1.54B | 1.36B | 1.41B | 1.29B | 604.84M | 749.90M |
Cash Flow | ||||||
| Free Cash Flow | -21.26M | -23.78M | 69.78M | 152.40M | 45.58M | -207.41M |
| Operating Cash Flow | 33.28M | 17.01M | 126.32M | 174.47M | 103.37M | -150.69M |
| Investing Cash Flow | 92.76M | 277.90M | -4.85M | 308.20M | 204.74M | -220.46M |
| Financing Cash Flow | -179.18M | -299.45M | -244.52M | -386.15M | -85.13M | 524.94M |
Name | Overall Rating | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | ROE | Dividend Yield | Revenue Growth | EPS Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
67 Neutral | HK$1.54B | 2.05 | 8.96% | 6.91% | -16.94% | -22.17% | |
66 Neutral | HK$1.25B | 3.25 | 15.50% | 5.30% | 3.23% | 2.73% | |
66 Neutral | $17.65B | 18.10 | 5.60% | 3.62% | 6.62% | 11.55% | |
60 Neutral | HK$1.90B | 1.67 | 9.25% | ― | -3.67% | 38.19% | |
59 Neutral | HK$2.86B | 5.95 | 4.88% | 4.94% | 7.55% | -32.06% | |
49 Neutral | HK$932.18M | 9.74 | 6.00% | ― | 4.42% | -24.00% | |
45 Neutral | HK$364.18M | -2.78 | -3.93% | ― | -11.42% | 65.17% |
Beijing Gas Blue Sky Holdings Limited has disclosed that Dalian PetroChina Xiuhe Energy Co., Ltd. has filed an appeal with the Higher People’s Court of Liaoning Province, challenging a prior judgment in ongoing litigation involving the company and its subsidiaries over alleged claims related to their energy business dealings. The company said it will respond appropriately to the appeal, keep shareholders and potential investors updated through further announcements, and currently expects no material impact on the group’s daily operations, while stating it will take measures to minimize any potential disruption.
The most recent analyst rating on (HK:6828) stock is a Buy with a HK$0.05 price target. To see the full list of analyst forecasts on Beijing Gas Blue Sky Holdings Ltd stock, see the HK:6828 Stock Forecast page.
Beijing Gas Blue Sky Holdings Limited has disclosed an update on a lawsuit in mainland China brought by three individuals who claim they were original shareholders of a target company and who allege that an equity transfer agreement signed in 2018 has not been fully honored. The claimants assert that they transferred 51% of the target company’s equity and management control to entities linked to Beijing Gas Blue Sky, but that only part of the agreed RMB161.8 million consideration has been paid, and they are seeking full payment, contractual penalties, and legal costs from the defendants. Beijing Gas Blue Sky rejects the assertion that it is the ultimate controller of the two co-defendants, Hill Hero Limited and Shenzhen Hanlong Technical Service Co., and has engaged PRC legal advisers to mount a vigorous defense. The company says the litigation currently has no material impact on the group’s daily operations, though it acknowledges the case is at an early stage and the financial and legal outcomes remain uncertain, which could carry implications for its financial obligations depending on the court’s eventual ruling.
The most recent analyst rating on (HK:6828) stock is a Hold with a HK$0.03 price target. To see the full list of analyst forecasts on Beijing Gas Blue Sky Holdings Ltd stock, see the HK:6828 Stock Forecast page.
Beijing Gas Blue Sky Holdings Limited has announced a favourable court judgment in a long-running dispute tied to the acquisition of a 10% equity interest in Benxi Liaoyou, where Dalian PetroChina Xiuhe Energy had sought to recover an outstanding consideration from the company and its affiliates via an assigned debt claim. The Court ruled that the debt assignment agreement between the claimant and the original seller, Liaohe Longyi, was invalid, leading to the dismissal of all claims against Beijing Gas Blue Sky, Shenzhen Xinliao and Guizhou Shunyao, and ordering the claimant to bear the case acceptance and preservation fees, though the parties retain a limited window to appeal. The ruling removes a legal overhang related to the transaction and alleviates potential financial and reputational pressures on the company, although any appeal could prolong the matter.
The most recent analyst rating on (HK:6828) stock is a Hold with a HK$0.04 price target. To see the full list of analyst forecasts on Beijing Gas Blue Sky Holdings Ltd stock, see the HK:6828 Stock Forecast page.
Beijing Gas Blue Sky Holdings Limited has announced the acceptance of a facility letter for an uncommitted revolving loan facility amounting to up to CNY200 million. This financial arrangement requires Beijing Gas Group Co., Ltd. and Beijing Enterprises Holdings Limited to maintain a majority shareholding in the company, ensuring stability and continuity in its operations. The facility’s terms allow for annual extensions at the bank’s discretion, providing flexibility in financial management. This move is likely to impact the company’s financial strategy and stakeholder confidence positively.
Beijing Gas Blue Sky Holdings Limited announced the acceptance of a supplementary facility letter, extending the maturity date of its revolving loan facility to 12 months. This extension is subject to the bank’s right to demand repayment or alter terms at its discretion. The company must ensure that the State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission remains the largest shareholder, and that BE Group and Beijing Gas Group maintain a minimum 51% shareholding in the company. Failure to comply could result in the termination of the facility and immediate repayment demands.