tiprankstipranks
Trending News
More News >
Advertisement

LCTD - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

LCTD

BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTD)

Rating:66Neutral
Price Target:
LCTD, the BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF, has a solid overall rating driven mainly by high-quality global leaders like HSBC and AstraZeneca, which show strong financial performance, positive earnings outlooks, and supportive corporate or strategic developments. Industrial and technology names such as Hitachi and Siemens also add strength through revenue growth and profitability, though some holdings like Schneider Electric and Airbus face bearish technical trends and valuation concerns, which slightly weigh on the fund’s rating. A key risk factor is that several major holdings show signs of being expensive or under technical pressure at the same time, which could increase volatility if market conditions worsen.
Positive Factors
Broad International Diversification
The fund spreads its investments across many countries outside the U.S., which helps reduce the impact of problems in any single market.
Balanced Sector Mix
Holdings are spread across financials, industrials, technology, health care, and other sectors, limiting reliance on any one part of the economy.
Solid Recent Performance
The ETF has shown steady gains over the past month, three months, and year-to-date, indicating positive recent momentum.
Negative Factors
Heavy Tilt to Financials
A large share of the portfolio is in financial companies, which can hurt returns if that sector runs into trouble.
Mixed Results Among Top Holdings
While some leading positions have performed strongly, others have been weak, which can create uneven performance for the fund.
Meaningful Single-Country Exposure
Significant weights in countries like Japan and the UK mean the fund can be sensitive to economic or political issues in those markets.

LCTD vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

LCTD Summary

LCTD is the BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF, focused on companies outside the United States that are moving toward a lower‑carbon, more environmentally friendly future. It follows a low‑carbon, sustainability theme rather than a traditional stock index and spreads investments across many countries and sectors, including financials, industrials, and technology. Well-known holdings include ASML and HSBC. Someone might invest in LCTD to gain international diversification while supporting companies working on climate and energy transition. A key risk is that the fund’s value can go up or down with global stock markets and changing attitudes toward green investing.
How much will it cost me?The BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTD) has an expense ratio of 0.20%, meaning you’ll pay $2 per year for every $1,000 invested. This cost is lower than average for actively managed funds, as it focuses on a specific theme—low-carbon transition—while still maintaining competitive fees.
What would affect this ETF?The ETF's focus on companies transitioning to a low-carbon economy could benefit from global policies promoting sustainability and increased demand for green technologies, especially in developed markets outside the U.S. However, it may face challenges from regulatory changes, economic slowdowns in key regions, or reduced investment in carbon transition initiatives. Sector exposure to financials and industrials adds potential for growth but also vulnerability to interest rate fluctuations and economic cycles.

LCTD Top 10 Holdings

LCTD leans heavily on non-U.S. financials and industrials, with ASML, HSBC, Hitachi, Siemens, and Airbus doing much of the heavy lifting. ASML has been a clear bright spot, rising steadily and giving the fund a tech-powered tailwind, while HSBC and Hitachi add to the momentum with solid, rising trends. On the flip side, Schneider Electric has been losing steam lately, and Allianz looks a bit sluggish, subtly weighing on returns. Overall, this is a developed-markets ex-U.S. play, with Europe and Japan at center stage in the low-carbon transition story.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
ASML Holding NV2.10%$4.97M€456.24B72.02%
76
Outperform
HSBC Holdings1.96%$4.65M£216.17B51.15%
80
Outperform
AstraZeneca1.61%$3.80M£209.44B18.97%
80
Outperform
Iberdrola1.35%$3.20M€124.00B39.33%
67
Neutral
Hitachi,Ltd.1.34%$3.18M¥23.24T47.92%
77
Outperform
Canadian Bank of Commerce1.30%$3.07MC$117.06B49.04%
74
Outperform
Siemens1.21%$2.87M€195.77B25.87%
74
Outperform
Allianz1.20%$2.84M€139.32B17.67%
67
Neutral
Schneider Electric1.12%$2.65M€132.56B0.10%
62
Neutral
SAP SE1.08%$2.55M€223.32B-38.35%
66
Neutral

LCTD Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
54.72
Positive
100DMA
53.71
Positive
200DMA
51.32
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
0.76
Negative
RSI
59.10
Neutral
STOCH
77.14
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For LCTD, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 56.47, equal to the 50-day MA of 54.72, and equal to the 200-day MA of 51.32, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.76 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 59.10 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 77.14 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for LCTD.

LCTD Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$238.20M0.22%
$633.84M0.65%
$534.83M0.55%
$429.64M0.65%
$428.39M0.65%
$157.39M0.19%
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
LCTD
BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF
57.90
14.05
32.04%
FEPI
REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF
BKGI
BNY Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF
AIPI
REX AI Equity Premium Income ETF
SAMT
Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF
IQSZ
Invesco Global Equity Net Zero ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement