tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

BINV - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

BINV

Brandes International ETF (BINV)

Rating:57Neutral
Price Target:
BINV, the Brandes International ETF, has a solid but not outstanding overall rating, reflecting a mix of strong global companies and a few holdings with notable challenges. High-quality positions like GSK, Richemont, Heineken, Henkel, and Sanofi support the fund’s quality through strong financial performance, reasonable valuations, and attractive dividends, especially in defensive sectors like healthcare and consumer staples. However, holdings such as Alibaba, SAP, Takeda, and Fresenius Medical Care introduce risks around overvaluation, bearish technical trends, and cash flow or profitability pressures, and the fund’s concentration in international healthcare and consumer names is a key sector risk to keep in mind.
Positive Factors
Broad International Diversification
The fund spreads its investments across many countries, including the U.S., Europe, and Asia, which helps reduce the impact of problems in any single market.
Balanced Sector Mix
Holdings are spread across health care, consumer, industrial, technology, and other sectors, helping smooth out performance when one industry is struggling.
Several Strong Top Holdings
Some of the largest positions, such as Takeda Pharmaceutical, Carrefour, Astellas Pharma, and Ambev, have shown strong recent performance, supporting the fund’s overall results.
Negative Factors
High Expense Ratio
The fund’s expense ratio is relatively high for an ETF, which means more of your returns are used to cover fees each year.
Mixed Performance Among Top Holdings
Key positions like Sanofi, SAP, Henkel, and Heineken have shown weak recent performance, which can drag on the fund’s returns.
Short-Term Performance Bumps
While performance so far this year is positive, the fund has recently had a weak three-month stretch, showing that returns can be uneven over shorter periods.

BINV vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

BINV Summary

Brandes International ETF (BINV) is an actively managed fund that invests in a wide mix of companies outside the U.S., with a focus on “value” stocks—businesses the managers believe are currently priced lower than what they’re worth. It doesn’t track a set index, but spreads money across many countries and sectors, including well-known names like Sanofi and Alibaba. Investors might consider BINV for long-term growth and diversification beyond the U.S. market. A key risk is that international and value stocks can be out of favor for long periods, so the share price can rise and fall significantly over time.
How much will it cost me?The Brandes International ETF (BINV) has an expense ratio of 0.7%, which means you’ll pay $7 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because it is actively managed, meaning experts are selecting stocks rather than following a passive index.
What would affect this ETF?The Brandes International ETF (BINV) could benefit from global economic recovery and increased consumer spending, particularly in sectors like Consumer Defensive and Health Care, which are heavily weighted in its portfolio. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates or geopolitical tensions that could impact international markets and the performance of its top holdings, such as Sanofi and Alibaba. Additionally, regulatory changes in emerging markets could pose risks to some of its investments.

BINV Top 10 Holdings

BINV leans heavily into international value names, with a clear tilt toward European and Asian blue chips rather than U.S. giants. Recently, DHL and Richemont have been doing the heavy lifting, with rising momentum that helps offset softer spots elsewhere. On the other side, Alibaba has been dragging the fund, while SAP looks stuck in a rough patch despite solid business trends. Health care anchors like Sanofi and Takeda are more steady than spectacular, giving the ETF a defensive backbone within a broadly diversified global mix.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Sanofi3.00%$14.47M€89.40B-12.06%
75
Outperform
SAP SE2.55%$12.28M$179.67B-48.59%
69
Neutral
Alibaba2.42%$11.64M$256.89B-7.18%
68
Neutral
Takeda Pharmaceutical Co2.33%$11.21M¥7.82T12.26%
66
Neutral
Henkel AG & Co. KGaA2.29%$11.05M€27.78B7.70%
73
Outperform
2.27%$10.91M
Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA2.07%$9.97MCHF107.76B23.72%
78
Outperform
Heineken Holding NV2.07%$9.97M€17.64B-1.70%
76
Outperform
GlaxoSmithKline2.02%$9.73M$102.05B32.62%
77
Outperform
Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA1.96%$9.44M€10.81B-11.97%
64
Neutral

BINV Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
42.67
Positive
100DMA
42.56
Positive
200DMA
40.95
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
-0.04
Positive
RSI
51.47
Neutral
STOCH
29.70
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For BINV, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 42.64, equal to the 50-day MA of 42.67, and equal to the 200-day MA of 40.95, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of -0.04 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 51.47 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 29.70 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for BINV.

BINV Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$488.62M0.70%
57
Neutral
$534.52M0.49%
61
Neutral
$521.89M0.44%
71
Outperform
$457.83M0.60%
70
Neutral
$341.44M0.80%
56
Neutral
$172.27M0.35%
70
Outperform
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
BINV
Brandes International ETF
42.73
7.22
20.33%
FPAG
FPA Global Equity ETF
MFSV
MFS Active Value ETF
GMOI
GMO International Value ETF
COPY
Tweedy Browne Insider + Value ETF Trust Units
CSTK
Invesco Comstock Contrarian Equity ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement