Top Page
Tata Steel Limited
(TATASTEEL)
Tata Steel Limited (TATASTEEL) vs. iShares MSCI India ETF (INDA)
Tata Steel Limited Business Overview & Revenue Model
Tata Steel Limited Financial Statement Overview
| Breakdown | TTM | Dec 2025 | Dec 2024 | Dec 2023 | Dec 2022 | Dec 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Income Statement | ||||||
| Total Revenue | 2.17T | 2.19T | 2.29T | 2.43T | 2.44T | 1.56T |
| Gross Profit | 1.14T | 1.14T | 1.16T | 1.20T | 1.54T | 941.03B |
| EBITDA | 245.27B | 239.65B | 212.88B | 296.50B | 637.20B | 275.13B |
| Net Income | 45.39B | 34.21B | -44.37B | 87.60B | 401.54B | 74.90B |
Balance Sheet | ||||||
| Total Assets | 0.00 | 2.79T | 2.73T | 2.88T | 2.85T | 2.45T |
| Cash, Cash Equivalents and Short-Term Investments | 100.48B | 100.48B | 88.55B | 184.23B | 260.79B | 141.42B |
| Total Debt | 0.00 | 948.01B | 870.82B | 848.93B | 755.54B | 885.01B |
| Total Liabilities | -913.53B | 1.88T | 1.81T | 1.83T | 1.68T | 1.68T |
| Stockholders Equity | 913.53B | 911.70B | 920.36B | 1.03T | 1.14T | 742.39B |
Cash Flow | ||||||
| Free Cash Flow | 0.00 | 78.41B | 20.94B | 75.41B | 338.59B | 373.48B |
| Operating Cash Flow | 0.00 | 235.12B | 203.01B | 216.83B | 443.81B | 443.27B |
| Investing Cash Flow | 0.00 | -141.73B | -142.51B | -186.80B | -108.81B | -93.23B |
| Financing Cash Flow | 0.00 | -70.02B | -110.97B | -69.81B | -234.01B | -370.90B |
Tata Steel Limited Technical Analysis
Tata Steel Limited Peers Comparison
Name | Overall Rating | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | ROE | Dividend Yield | Revenue Growth | EPS Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
75 Outperform | ₹736.93B | 10.49 | ― | 4.05% | 20.05% | 15.58% | |
73 Outperform | ₹629.49B | 24.63 | ― | 1.21% | 6.45% | 1.13% | |
71 Outperform | ₹2.36T | 34.68 | ― | 2.11% | -0.42% | 132.70% | |
68 Neutral | ₹658.17B | 29.91 | ― | 0.77% | 8.14% | ― | |
66 Neutral | ₹2.89T | 47.85 | ― | 0.26% | 2.14% | 20.37% | |
61 Neutral | $10.43B | 7.12 | -0.05% | 2.87% | 2.86% | -36.73% | |
57 Neutral | ₹1.06T | 38.47 | ― | 0.20% | -2.21% | -46.30% |
Tata Steel Limited Corporate Events
Tata Steel has updated exchanges on ongoing litigation related to substantial demand notices issued by the Office of the Deputy Director of Mines, Jajpur, over alleged shortfalls in mineral and chrome ore dispatch from its Sukinda Chromite Block for the fourth and fifth years of its Mine Development and Production Agreement. The demands, totaling more than ₹4,300 crore and linked to alleged violations of Rule 12-A of the Minerals (Other than Atomic and Hydro Carbons Energy Minerals) Concession Rules, 2016, also involve proposed appropriation of performance security; however, the Orissa High Court has continued interim protection for the company, restraining authorities from coercive action until at least January 19, 2026, temporarily limiting immediate financial and operational impact while the disputes are adjudicated.
Tata Steel Limited has disclosed that it has received an order from the Joint Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Jamshedpur, directing the company to pay ₹890.52 crore in tax, an equal amount as penalty, and applicable interest, in connection with alleged irregular availment of input tax credit under GST laws for financial years 2018-19 to 2020-21. The company disputes the order, asserting that the purported excess input tax credit arises only from timing differences in claiming credits across financial years, which it maintains is permissible under GST regulations, and it plans to challenge the demand before the appropriate forum within statutory timelines; Tata Steel has stated that, given the merits of its case, it does not expect any impact on its financial, operational, or other activities from this development.
Tata Steel has disclosed that its Dutch subsidiaries, Tata Steel Nederland B.V. and Tata Steel IJmuiden B.V., are facing a collective legal action in the Netherlands filed by Stichting Frisse Wind.nu on behalf of residents living near the company’s operations in Velsen-Noord. The claim, brought under the Dutch Act on Collective Settlement of Mass Claims, alleges that emissions and other aspects of the subsidiaries’ activities have caused health-related damage and reduced enjoyment and value of nearby homes, and seeks approximately EUR 1.4 billion in compensation, financed by third-party litigation funders. Tata Steel’s subsidiaries contend that the case faces significant hurdles on both admissibility and substance, describe the compensation claim as unsubstantiated and speculative due to a lack of supporting evidence, and state they have already identified substantial grounds for defence. The proceedings are expected to unfold over several years in two phases—admissibility and merits—with no debate on the quantum of claims anticipated in the near term, suggesting limited immediate financial impact but underscoring ongoing legal and environmental scrutiny of the group’s European operations.
Tata Steel Limited has received a favourable order from the Joint Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Jamshedpur, in relation to a show cause-cum-demand notice originally issued to erstwhile Tata Steel Long Products Limited, which has since been amalgamated into Tata Steel. The authority acknowledged that Tata Steel had already paid ₹160.28 crore of GST compensation cess through its returns, appropriated this amount to the government, and dropped the residual alleged tax demand of ₹1.23 crore, effectively setting aside the entire aggregate demand of ₹161.51 crore and imposing no penalty on the company. The outcome removes a significant contingent tax exposure linked to the amalgamated entity, easing potential financial and legal overhang for Tata Steel and its stakeholders.
Tata Steel has disclosed that it has received an order from the Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Jamshedpur, directing the company to pay ₹493.35 crore in tax, a penalty of ₹638.83 crore and applicable interest, in connection with an alleged irregular availment of input tax credit under the GST regime for financial years 2018-19 to 2022-23. The tax demand follows an earlier show cause notice, where part of the GST amount had already been paid in the normal course of business, and Tata Steel contends that its submissions were not adequately considered. The company maintains that it has a strong case on merit, intends to challenge the order before the appropriate forum within the prescribed timelines, and has stated that the order does not impact its financial, operational or other activities, indicating limited immediate business disruption but adding a significant tax dispute to its regulatory and legal landscape.
Tata Steel Limited has announced ongoing litigation concerning its Sukinda Chromite Block, with two writ petitions filed against demand letters issued by the Office of Deputy Director of Mines, Jajpur. The demands, totaling over ₹4,313 crore, relate to alleged shortfalls in mineral dispatch and violations of mining regulations. The Orissa High Court has extended interim protection for Tata Steel, preventing coercive actions until the next hearing on December 19, 2025. This legal development could impact Tata Steel’s operational stability and financial obligations, with significant implications for stakeholders.
Tata Steel Limited has announced a scheduled meeting with analysts and institutional investors, in compliance with the Securities and Exchange Board of India’s regulations. This meeting, set for December 17, 2025, aims to engage with stakeholders and provide insights into the company’s operations and strategic direction, potentially impacting investor relations and market perception.
Tata Steel Limited has announced a scheduled virtual meeting with analysts and institutional investors, as part of its compliance with the Securities and Exchange Board of India’s regulations. This meeting, set for December 11, 2025, is an opportunity for the company to engage with stakeholders, potentially impacting its market perception and investor relations.
Tata Steel Limited is currently involved in a legal dispute concerning a demand for over ₹2410 crore related to the Sukinda Chromite Block. The Orissa High Court has provided interim protection to Tata Steel, preventing authorities from taking coercive actions until the next hearing on December 3, 2025. This legal development could impact Tata Steel’s operations and financial obligations, highlighting the ongoing challenges in regulatory compliance and resource management.