tiprankstipranks
Trending News
More News >
Cleanspark, Inc. (CLSK)
NASDAQ:CLSK

Cleanspark (CLSK) AI Stock Analysis

Compare
7,566 Followers

Top Page

CLSK

Cleanspark

(NASDAQ:CLSK)

Select Model
Select Model
Select Model
Neutral 52 (OpenAI - 5.2)
Rating:52Neutral
Price Target:
$11.00
▲(12.70% Upside)
Action:ReiteratedDate:03/06/26
The score is held back primarily by weak cash generation and earnings volatility, despite strong revenue scaling and a relatively supportive balance sheet. Technicals remain below key longer-term moving averages and valuation support is limited due to negative earnings. Offsetting these, the latest call highlighted strong liquidity, continued operational scale, and progress toward an AI/data-center platform, but with meaningful capex and timing risks.
Positive Factors
Mining scale and fleet efficiency
Sustained scale (>50 EH/s) and improving miner efficiency reduce per‑unit electricity costs and raise long‑term Bitcoin production capacity. A predominantly economic fleet limits shutdown risk, supporting durable mined‑BTC supply and stable core revenue generation over months to years.
Strong liquidity and balance sheet optionality
Material immediate liquidity (> $800M) and a conservatively levered balance sheet give the company flexibility to fund capex, pursue AI/data‑center builds, or weather Bitcoin price cycles without forced asset sales. This lowers near‑term financing risk and preserves strategic optionality.
AI / data‑center pipeline and structural expansion
Building a large utility‑grade power platform and land pipeline (hundreds of MW) positions the company to diversify into tenant‑driven AI/data‑center leasing. Long‑dated leases and grade‑A counterparties can create recurring, contractable cash flows distinct from mining revenue over the medium term.
Negative Factors
Weak cash generation
Persistent negative operating and free cash flow means core business currently burns cash despite reported revenues. Over 2–6 months this limits internal funding for capex and growth, increases reliance on external financing, and heightens execution risk for multi‑MW builds.
Earnings volatility from Bitcoin mark‑to‑market
Large fair‑value swings on held Bitcoin create material quarter‑to‑quarter earnings volatility. This persistent accounting volatility complicates investor assessment, may strain covenants or financing costs, and forces management to prioritize liquidity buffers over productive deployment.
High capital intensity and timing/execution risk
Very high per‑MW capex and site‑specific build timelines mean cash outlays are large and returns deferred. Delivery depends on tenant diligence, power coordination and construction execution, raising the chance of schedule slips, cost overruns, or delayed revenue conversion over the medium term.

Cleanspark (CLSK) vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

Cleanspark Business Overview & Revenue Model

Company DescriptionCleanSpark, Inc. provides bitcoin mining and energy technology solutions worldwide. It operates in two segments, Digital Currency Mining and Energy. The Digital Currency Mining segment engages in mining of bitcoin. The energy segment provides engineering, design and software, custom hardware, open automated demand response, solar, and energy storage solutions for microgrids and distributed energy systems to military, commercial, and residential customers; and develops platforms that enables designing, building, operating, and managing of energy assets. This segment also offers microgrid energy modeling, energy market communications, and energy management solutions comprising mPulse and mVoult, which are control platforms that enables integration and optimization of multiple energy sources; Canvas, a middleware for grid operators and aggregators to administrate load shifting programs; Plaid, a middleware for controls and Internet-of-Things products companies to participate in load shifting programs; and mVSO, an energy modeling software for internal microgrid design, as well as owns gasification energy technologies for various applications, such as feedstock for the generation of di-methyl ether. In addition, it provides design, software development, and other technology-based consulting services; data center services, including rack space, power, and equipment; and various cloud services, such as virtual, virtual storage, and data backup services. The company was formerly known as Stratean Inc. and changed its name to CleanSpark, Inc. in November 2016. CleanSpark, Inc. was incorporated in 1987 and is headquartered in Henderson, Nevada.
How the Company Makes MoneyCleanspark generates revenue primarily through its cryptocurrency mining operations, where it earns Bitcoin by validating transactions on the Bitcoin network. The company capitalizes on lower energy costs from renewable sources, allowing it to achieve higher profit margins compared to traditional mining operations. Additionally, Cleanspark may engage in sales of mined Bitcoin, leveraging market conditions to maximize revenue. The company also explores partnerships with energy providers and other stakeholders in the renewable energy space, which can enhance its operational efficiency and reduce costs further. Furthermore, Cleanspark may benefit from any increases in Bitcoin prices, as higher cryptocurrency valuations directly affect the profitability of its mining activities.

Cleanspark Earnings Call Summary

Earnings Call Date:Feb 05, 2026
(Q1-2026)
|
% Change Since: |
Next Earnings Date:May 07, 2026
Earnings Call Sentiment Positive
The call reflects a constructive strategic transition: operational mining continues to generate durable cash flows and scale (>$180M revenue, >50 EH/s) while management is actively converting power and land assets into an AI data center platform with advanced tenant-driven diligence and sizable liquidity. Results were distorted this quarter by large non-cash mark-to-market Bitcoin adjustments that produced a reported net loss and negative adjusted EBITDA, but normalized operating metrics (normalized EBITDA ~$55M, strong gross margin ~47%) and DAM early wins show underlying cash generation. Key near-term risks are mark-to-market volatility, QoQ revenue pressure from difficulty and price, higher CapEx intensity for AI builds, and some timing uncertainty on site energization. On balance, strategic progress, strong liquidity, executive discipline (large share buybacks) and early revenue/cash generation from DAM and mining outweigh the transitory accounting losses and execution/timing risks.
Q1-2026 Updates
Positive Updates
Revenue and Gross Margin
Revenue of ~$181M for Q1 FY2026 (more than $180M); year-over-year revenue growth of ~12% (approximately $19M); gross margin exceeded 47% (healthy margin despite macro/micro pressures).
Normalized Operating Cash Generation
On a normalized basis (adjusting for mark-to-market), normalized EBITDA was ~$55M, representing ~30% normalized margin — indicating positive cash generation from core operations.
Mining Scale and Efficiency
Scaled mining footprint of >50 exahash/s (EH/s); Bitcoin production revenue rate ~ $100,000 per BTC this quarter versus ~$84,000 in the year-ago quarter; less than 10% of the fleet currently unprofitable at prevailing Bitcoin prices.
Digital Asset Management (DAM) Early Success
DAM generated >$13M in premiums/cash in the quarter (~24% of normalized adjusted EBITDA); covered-call program added ~$7,700 (~8%) per Bitcoin on average sales price; annualized return of ~4.2% on average total balance from DAM; basis trade produced >5.5% annualized on allocated cash.
Balance Sheet Liquidity and Capital Actions
Closed $1.15B convertible offering in Nov 2025; cash balance increased >$400M QoQ with ~ $420M net cash proceeds retained after paying lines and repurchases; repurchased ~$463M of stock in the offering and >$600M total repurchases since Dec 2024 (~20% of shares outstanding repurchased).
Bitcoin Holdings and Financing Optionality
Holding ~13,000+ Bitcoin total with ~40% (~5,200 BTC) allocated to yield generation; Bitcoin valuation on balance sheet was $1.15B as of 12/31; combined cash and capacity on BTC-backed credit lines provide >$800M liquidity without selling Bitcoin.
Strategic AI / Data Center M&A and Pipeline
Acquired 271 acres in Austin County with 285 MW contracted power and potential gas behind-the-meter optionality; initiated Brazoria County development with initial 300 MW (expandable to 600 MW); added 122-acre parcel adjacent to Sandersville — aggregate Houston-area potential ~900 MW, forming an AI infrastructure hub.
Commercial Momentum and Tenant-Driven Diligence
Management reports advanced, tenant-driven diligence across multiple sites (power studies, cooling validation, commercial structuring); Sandersville cited as a clear frontrunner for demand given 250 MW of live power and energized substation.
Negative Updates
Large Non-Cash Mark-to-Market Impact
Reported net loss of approximately $379M in Q1 FY2026 versus net income of ~$247M a year ago; adjusted EBITDA negative $295M compared with +$322M YoY — primary driver was ~ $350M of non-cash mark-to-market Bitcoin fair-value adjustments.
Quarter-over-Quarter Revenue Decline
Revenues declined ~ $43M, or ~19% QoQ (from Q4 to Q1), primarily due to rising network difficulty and softer Bitcoin prices, resulting in some of the lowest cash prices historically during the quarter.
Gross Margin Compression YoY
Gross margin declined from ~57% a year ago to ~47% this quarter, driven mainly by higher network difficulty and modestly higher power costs.
Bitcoin Balance Sheet Revaluation
Bitcoin value on the balance sheet fell from ~$1.5B to ~$1.15B (difference ~ $350M), reflecting mark-to-market volatility that materially affected reported earnings.
Rising Power Costs and Operational Headwinds
Average power price increased YoY to $0.056/kWh from $0.049/kWh (QoQ decreased slightly from $0.059 to $0.056), contributing to margin pressure amid rising network difficulty.
Near-Term Negative Adjusted EBITDA and Elevated SG&A Potential
Adjusted EBITDA swung to negative $295M for the quarter (from +$182M in prior quarter) largely due to noncash items; management flagged expected increases to professional fees, payroll and G&A as AI strategy execution progresses.
Capital Intensity of AI Data Center Builds
Expected CapEx for AI data center deployments is high (~$9M–$11M per MW); timing and customer-specific design will materially affect cash deployment and when projects become revenue-generating.
Execution and Timing Uncertainty on Some Sites
Brazoria County closing contains conditions and lacks the same clarity as Sealy (Sealy has first 207 MW targeted H1 2027; Brazoria energization range cited Q4 2027–Q1 2028) — creating timing uncertainty for some capacity availability.
Company Guidance
The call guided that CleanSpark is evolving into a multi‑stream digital infrastructure platform anchored by scarce utility‑grade power while maintaining a >50 EH/s Bitcoin mining footprint; Q1 FY2026 results showed revenue ≈$181M (up ≈$19M YoY, ≈+12%; down ≈$43M Q/Q, ≈‑19%), gross margin ≈47% (vs ≈57% a year ago), net loss ≈$379M (vs net income ≈$247M prior year), adjusted EBITDA ≈‑$295M (vs +$322M YoY) driven by ≈$350M of mark‑to‑market charges, and normalized EBITDA ≈$55M (~30% normalized margin). Key financial/capital metrics: cash up >$400M after a $1.15B 0% convertible in Nov (net proceeds ≈$420M after paying lines and repurchasing ≈$463M of stock; total share repurchases >$600M since Dec‑2024, ~20% of shares repurchased), total debt ≈$1.8B (net debt to liquidity ≈1.1), >13,000 BTC holdings valued ≈$1.15B at 12/31, and >$800M liquidity available (cash + BTC‑backed lines). DAM produced >$13M in premiums/cash (≈24% of normalized EBITDA), a covered‑call uplift of ≈$7,700 per BTC (~8% vs avg sales price ≈$97,200), annualized premium return ≈4.2%, and a basis‑trade yield >5.5% (≈200 bps over risk‑free). AI/data‑center and operational guidance: assembled ~900 MW Houston‑area potential (Sandersville ≈250 MW live + new 122‑acre parcel; Sealy 271 acres/285 MW with ~207–209 MW targeted H1’27 and ~40 MW in ’28 and ’29; Brazoria up to 477 acres/initial 300 MW expandable to 600 MW with energization aimed Q4’27–Q1’28), expected build CapEx ≈$9–$11M per MW, tenant‑driven basis‑of‑design approach, focus on grade‑A counterparties and long‑dated leases, continued use of mining to monetize assets until load transition, and ongoing fleet efficiency improvements (current fleet ~16.07 J/TH moving toward 13.5 J/TH immersion machines, with <10% of fleet currently uneconomic at prevailing BTC prices).

Cleanspark Financial Statement Overview

Summary
Strong revenue growth and a generally low-leverage balance sheet are positives, but profitability is volatile (TTM back to losses) and cash flow is the key weakness with deeply negative operating and free cash flow, raising earnings-quality and funding-risk concerns.
Income Statement
62
Positive
Revenue has scaled rapidly (TTM (Trailing-Twelve-Months) up ~246% and FY2025 up ~102% YoY), showing strong top-line momentum. Profitability is mixed: FY2025 shows positive operating profit and net income, but TTM (Trailing-Twelve-Months) swings back to a sizable net loss and negative operating profit, signaling earnings volatility. Gross margin is healthy overall but compressed in TTM (Trailing-Twelve-Months) versus FY2025, suggesting pressure on unit economics or mix.
Balance Sheet
74
Positive
The balance sheet looks conservatively levered with very low debt relative to equity in the latest period, and equity has grown substantially over time, supporting financial flexibility. Return on equity improved markedly from negative levels in prior years to positive in the most recent periods, indicating improved profitability versus history. Key risk: leverage metrics appear to shift meaningfully across periods, so capital structure stability should be monitored.
Cash Flow
28
Negative
Cash generation is the main weak spot: operating cash flow is deeply negative in TTM (Trailing-Twelve-Months) and FY2025, and free cash flow is materially negative across recent periods, implying significant cash burn. While free cash flow growth is positive in the latest periods, it is improving from a very negative base rather than consistently producing cash. Overall, earnings quality is challenged because cash flow is not currently supporting reported profitability.
BreakdownTTMSep 2025Sep 2024Sep 2023Sep 2022Sep 2021
Income Statement
Total Revenue785.19M766.31M378.97M168.41M131.53M39.29M
Gross Profit324.72M318.83M139.36M29.11M49.37M12.84M
EBITDA139.33M763.25M14.63M-7.60M10.03M1.25M
Net Income-261.04M364.46M-145.78M-138.15M-57.33M-21.81M
Balance Sheet
Total Assets3.33B3.18B1.96B761.58M452.63M317.47M
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Short-Term Investments1.29B1.01B553.80M86.18M32.22M38.93M
Total Debt1.79B824.44M66.95M16.74M22.22M1.54M
Total Liabilities1.94B1.01B201.82M85.91M48.61M11.76M
Stockholders Equity1.38B2.18B1.76B675.67M404.01M305.72M
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow-1.05B-1.02B-1.04B-318.12M-117.23M-252.56M
Operating Cash Flow-502.71M-461.03M-233.66M-17.25M73.46M-23.99M
Investing Cash Flow29.88M-305.66M-920.40M-331.93M-210.98M-229.16M
Financing Cash Flow654.12M688.87M1.25B357.93M139.95M268.06M

Cleanspark Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Negative
Last Price9.76
Price Trends
50DMA
10.81
Negative
100DMA
12.10
Negative
200DMA
12.23
Negative
Market Momentum
MACD
-0.24
Negative
RSI
43.00
Neutral
STOCH
49.42
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in stock analysis to make informed investment decisions. For CLSK, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of 9.76 is below the 20-day moving average (MA) of 9.94, below the 50-day MA of 10.81, and below the 200-day MA of 12.23, indicating a bearish trend. The MACD of -0.24 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 43.00 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 49.42 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for CLSK.

Cleanspark Risk Analysis

Cleanspark disclosed 79 risk factors in its most recent earnings report. Cleanspark reported the most risks in the "Finance & Corporate" category.
Finance & Corporate - Financial and accounting risks. Risks related to the execution of corporate activity and strategy
Latest Risks Added 0 New Risks

Cleanspark Peers Comparison

Overall Rating
UnderperformOutperform
Sector (68)
Financial Indicators
Name
Overall Rating
Market Cap
P/E Ratio
ROE
Dividend Yield
Revenue Growth
EPS Growth
68
Neutral
$18.00B11.429.92%3.81%9.73%1.22%
62
Neutral
$5.85B24.4218.25%20.97%226.98%
52
Neutral
$2.51B-1.90-13.75%102.21%
50
Neutral
$3.35B-110.00%2.53%-2.83%
50
Neutral
$13.82B-20.0518.65%236.14%
49
Neutral
$89.11M0.91-49.36%-35.61%
47
Neutral
$3.07B9.5115.46%13.79%-527.48%
* Financial Sector Average
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
CLSK
Cleanspark
9.40
1.96
26.34%
ENPH
Enphase Energy
44.11
-17.43
-28.32%
PLUG
Plug Power
2.23
0.70
45.75%
RUN
Sunrun
12.22
5.63
85.43%
STEM
Stem Inc
9.70
1.30
15.48%
IREN
IREN
41.29
34.14
477.48%

Cleanspark Corporate Events

Executive/Board ChangesShareholder Meetings
CleanSpark Shareholders Back Board Slate and Auditor Selection
Positive
Mar 5, 2026

CleanSpark, Inc. held its annual meeting of stockholders on March 3, 2026, with holders of approximately 68.19% of the collective voting power of its common and Series A preferred shares present or represented by proxy, thereby constituting a quorum. At the meeting, shareholders elected five directors to serve until the next annual meeting and ratified the appointment of BDO USA, P.C. as the company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, underscoring continued shareholder support for the existing board and audit oversight.

The voting results showed solid approval for all director nominees, with each candidate receiving substantially more votes for than withheld despite some variance in individual support levels. The near-unanimous vote to ratify BDO USA, P.C., with very few votes against or abstaining, signals investor confidence in CleanSpark’s financial reporting processes and governance stability heading into the 2026 fiscal year.

The most recent analyst rating on (CLSK) stock is a Buy with a $19.00 price target. To see the full list of analyst forecasts on Cleanspark stock, see the CLSK Stock Forecast page.

Glossary
BuyA stock rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the stock is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other stocks in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldA stock rated as a "Hold" is expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the stock is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellA stock rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the stock may deliver lower returns compared to other stocks in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst Stock Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in stocks carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: Mar 06, 2026