OWNB - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Bitwise Bitcoin Standard Corporations ETF (OWNB)
Rating:49Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Recent One-Month Rebound
The ETF has shown a strong bounce over the past month, suggesting improving short-term momentum after earlier weakness.
Top Holdings With Strong Bitcoin Leverage
Several of the largest positions have delivered strong gains this year, helping the fund participate meaningfully when Bitcoin-related stocks rise.
Global Exposure Within a Focused Theme
Holdings spread across the U.S., Japan, Canada, Hong Kong, and France provide some geographic diversification while still targeting Bitcoin-focused companies.
Negative Factors
High Concentration in a Few Names
The fund’s largest positions, especially the top holding, make up a significant share of assets, increasing the impact of any sharp move in those individual stocks.
Volatile and Recently Weak Performance
Year-to-date and recent three-month returns have been weak, highlighting the fund’s sensitivity to downturns in Bitcoin-related stocks.
Above-Average Expense Ratio
The ETF charges a relatively high fee, which can eat into returns over time compared with lower-cost alternatives.
OWNB vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM14.92M
RegionGlobal
Expense Ratio0.85%
Beta1.95
IssuerBitwise
Inception DateMar 11, 2025
Dividend Yield1.09%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedBitwise Bitcoin Standard Corporations Index - Benchmark TR Net
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume1,935
30 Day Avg. Volume8,417
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price TargetN/A
Price Target UpsideN/A
Rating ConsensusN/A
Number of Analyst Covering0
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
OWNB Summary
The Bitwise Bitcoin Standard Corporations ETF (OWNB) follows the Bitwise Bitcoin Standard Corporations Index, focusing on companies that hold Bitcoin or build businesses around Bitcoin and blockchain. It mainly owns U.S. financial and technology firms, including well-known Bitcoin-focused names like MicroStrategy (MSTR) and Riot Platforms (RIOT). Someone might invest in this ETF to seek high growth potential from the expanding digital asset and blockchain ecosystem, while getting diversification across many Bitcoin-related companies instead of picking just one stock. However, this ETF is heavily tied to Bitcoin prices and can be very volatile, so its value can rise and fall sharply.
How much will it cost me?The expense ratio for the Bitwise Bitcoin Standard Corporations ETF (OWNB) is 0.85%, which means you’ll pay $8.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because the fund is actively managed, focusing on companies involved in Bitcoin and blockchain innovation, which requires more research and management effort.
What would affect this ETF?The OWNB ETF could benefit from growing adoption of Bitcoin and blockchain technology, as well as increased interest in digital finance globally, particularly in its key sectors like financial and technology. However, it may face challenges from regulatory uncertainty around cryptocurrencies, potential volatility in Bitcoin prices, and broader economic conditions that impact consumer and business confidence. Its exposure to innovative but smaller companies could also amplify risks during market downturns.
OWNB Top 10 Holdings
This ETF is essentially a leveraged bet on the Bitcoin ecosystem, with a heavy tilt toward financial and tech names that live and die by crypto’s mood swings. MicroStrategy is the headline act, but its recent slide has been a real weight on the fund, while Metaplanet and Bullish are also losing steam. On the brighter side, miners like Riot Platforms, Marathon Digital, Cleanspark, and Hut 8 have been rising, giving the portfolio some much-needed lift. With a global mix of U.S. and Japanese names, performance is tightly hitched to Bitcoin’s boom‑and‑bust cycle.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strategy | 17.43% | $2.60M | $34.20B | -78.62% | 55 Neutral | |
| MARA Holdings | 7.98% | $1.19M | $4.64B | -36.78% | 64 Neutral | |
| Metaplanet KK | 7.13% | $1.06M | ¥313.91B | -81.68% | 50 Neutral | |
| Twenty One Capital | 6.88% | $1.03M | $3.46B | -84.70% | ― | |
| Remixpoint, Inc. | 5.77% | $861.01K | ¥29.76B | -61.62% | 53 Neutral | |
| Bullish | 4.54% | $677.83K | $3.74B | ― | 49 Neutral | |
| Blockchain Group SA | 4.44% | $662.57K | €144.09M | -88.50% | 41 Neutral | |
| Cleanspark | 4.39% | $654.87K | $3.45B | 12.41% | 73 Outperform | |
| Hut 8 | 4.37% | $651.87K | $11.07B | 375.00% | ― | |
| Empery Digital | 4.23% | $631.06K | $102.60M | -63.68% | 40 Underperform |
OWNB Technical Analysis
Negative
―
Price Trends
20.30
Negative
19.47
Negative
23.06
Negative
Market Momentum
-0.73
Negative
39.20
Neutral
24.25
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For OWNB, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 18.26, equal to the 50-day MA of 20.30, and equal to the 200-day MA of 23.06, indicating a bearish trend. The MACD of -0.73 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 39.20 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 24.25 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for OWNB.
OWNB Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
OWNB
Bitwise Bitcoin Standard Corporations ETF
17.24
-18.21
-51.37%
GINX
SGI Enhanced Global Income ETF
―
―
―
GOP
Unusual Whales Subversive Republican Trading ETF
―
―
―
SAGP
Strategas Global Policy Opportunities ETF
―
―
―
PRAY
FIS Biblically Responsible Risk Managed ETF
―
―
―
MNVT
Moonvest ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents