In the ordinary course of business, we collect, receive, store, protect, use, transmit, share, and dispose of (collectively, "process") personal data and other sensitive information. This subjects us to numerous federal, state, and international laws and regulations, industry standards, external and internal privacy and security policies, and contractual requirements addressing privacy, data protection, and the processing of such data and information.
Many U.S. states, and the federal and local governments, have adopted data protection and security legislation, including laws relating to personal data privacy and data breach notification. Many U.S. states have also enacted comprehensive privacy laws that impose obligations on covered businesses, such as requiring privacy disclosures and giving residents certain rights with respect to their personal data (e.g., the right to access, correct, or delete such data and to opt out of certain data processing activities). Certain U.S. states also impose strict requirements on the processing of personal data, such as conducting data privacy impact assessments, and provide statutory fines for non-compliance. For example, the CCPA applies to the personal data of California residents and requires covered businesses to provide specific privacy notice disclosures and honor requests to exercise certain privacy rights. The CCPA provides for statutory penalties and a private right of action for data breaches resulting from a failure to implement reasonable security procedures and practices. U.S. state and federal legislators continue to consider and enact similar laws, reflecting a trend toward more stringent privacy legislation in the United States. These and any future similar laws are likely to increase our compliance costs, particularly when they have conflicting requirements and evolving judicial interpretations, and may require us to further modify our data processing practices and policies.
There has also been a noticeable uptick in U.S. class action litigation in which plaintiffs utilize laws, including the Video Privacy Protection Act of 1988, the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, state wiretapping laws, and other privacy laws and regulations, relating to the use of tracking technologies such as cookies and pixels, as well as AI-enabled ‘chatbots' and customer service agents. This trend may lead legislatures to consider responsive regulation. Our inability or failure to obtain consent for these practices or to appropriately disclose them could result in adverse consequences, including class action litigation and mass arbitration demands.
Personal and other user data is also increasingly subject to legislation and regulations in foreign jurisdictions in which we operate. For example, PIPEDA is a comprehensive Canadian privacy and security law for organizations collecting, using, or disclosing information about identified individuals for commercial purposes. Certain Canadian provinces also have their own data protection regulations. Similarly, the United Kingdom, the European Union (the "EU"), and countries in the European Economic Area (the "EEA") traditionally have taken broader views on, and imposed different legal obligations on companies as to, the types of data that are subject to privacy and data protection laws and regulations. For example, the EU General Data Protection Regulation (the "GDPR") applies to companies that collect and use personal data in connection with the offering of goods or services to individuals in the EEA or the monitoring of their behavior. The United Kingdom has its own General Data Protection Regulation. Under the GDPR, companies may face bans on data processing, other corrective actions, monetary fines, and/or private litigation related to the processing of personal data. The APPI, a Japanese law governing the handling of personal information, may also impose obligations on covered entities that are in addition to, or differ from, those in other jurisdictions (for example, it differs from the GDPR with respect to its approach to notifications and the cross-border transfer of personal data). Compliance with these and any other foreign data privacy laws and regulations may significantly increase our operational costs and our overall risk exposure.
In the ordinary course of business, we transfer personal data from one jurisdiction to another. Certain European jurisdictions, including the United Kingdom, have enacted laws requiring that personal data be localized or limiting the transfer thereof to other jurisdictions, including the United States. Other jurisdictions have adopted or may adopt similar data localization and/or cross-border data transfer restrictions. Although there are various mechanisms that may be used to transfer such data from the United Kingdom and the EEA to the United States in compliance with these restrictions, they are subject to legal challenges and there can be no assurance that we can satisfy or rely on them. If there were no lawful manner for us to make such transfers, or if the requirements for doing so were too onerous, we could face adverse consequences, including the interruption of our operations, the need to relocate our data processing activities, and penalties such as fines and injunctions. In addition, companies that transfer personal data out of the United Kingdom and the EEA have faced increased scrutiny from regulators and litigants, and certain of such companies have been ordered by European regulators to suspend or cease certain such data transfers for allegedly violating the GDPR's cross-border data transfer restrictions.
Regulators in the United States are also increasingly scrutinizing personal data transfers and have proposed and enacted certain data localization or transfer requirements. For example, the U.S. Department of Justice has issued a rule that places additional restriction on certain data transactions involving countries of concern (e.g., China, Russia, Iran) and covered persons (i.e., individuals and entities who are designated as such by the U.S. Attorney General or are considered "foreign persons" and are majority owned by, or organized under the laws of, a primary resident in, or a contractor of, a covered person or country of concern) that may impact certain business activities such as vendor, employee, and contractor engagements, data sharing, and investor agreements. Violations of the rule could lead to significant civil and criminal fines and penalties.
We must also comply with certain industry standards and contractual obligations related to personal privacy, data security, and AI. For example, certain privacy laws, including the CCPA and the GDPR, require the imposition of specific contractual restrictions on service providers. We also publish privacy policies, marketing materials, and other statements related to compliance with certain certifications or self-regulatory principles concerning data privacy and security. U.S. regulators are increasingly scrutinizing these materials, and if they are found to be deficient, unfair, misleading, or misrepresentative of our practices, we could be subject to governmental enforcement actions or other adverse consequences.
From time to time, our personnel use generative AI technologies in the course of their work. We use also use AI technologies in certain of our products. The disclosure and use of personal and/or confidential data in generative AI technologies, and the development and use of such technologies, present various privacy and data security risks and are subject to an increasing number of laws and regulations. Several jurisdictions, including in the United States and Europe, have enacted laws and regulations governing the development and use of AI, such as the EU's AI Act, Colorado's Artificial Intelligence Act, and the CCPA's automated decision-making regulations, and we expect other jurisdictions will adopt similar laws. Certain consumer rights extended by privacy laws (e.g., the right to delete certain personal data and regulate automated decision-making) may also be incompatible with the use of AI technologies. Further, countries and states are applying their data and consumer protection laws to AI technologies, including generative AI and AI-enabled ‘chatbots.' As a result, our use of these technologies could result in additional compliance costs, lawsuits, and regulatory actions. However, our inability to use these technologies, or limitations on such use, could result in a competitive disadvantage.
The interpretation and application of many privacy and data protection laws are, and will likely remain, uncertain, and it is possible that these laws may be interpreted and applied in a manner that is inconsistent with each other and with our existing data management practices, policies, or product features. If so, in addition to the possibility of fines, lawsuits (including class action claims), additional reporting requirements and/or oversight, bans or restrictions on processing personal data, orders to destroy or not use personal data, and other claims and penalties, we could be required to change our business activities and practices or to modify our practices, policies, or products, which could adversely affect our business. In addition to government regulation, privacy advocacy and industry groups may propose new and different self-regulatory standards that legally or contractually apply to us. Any inability by us, or our service providers and partners, to adequately address privacy, data protection, and data security concerns or comply with applicable privacy, data protection, or data security laws, regulations, policies, and other obligations, could result in additional costs and liability to us and adversely affect our reputation, sales, and business.
In addition, any compromise of our information security, including that results in the unauthorized access, acquisition, or release of personal or other user data, or the perception that such a compromise has occurred, could harm our brand and reputation, discourage ticket sellers, buyers, and partners from using our platform, and result in litigation (including class claims) and/or fines and proceedings by governmental agencies, any of which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.