There is an increased focus from certain investors, customers, consumers, employees, policymakers and other stakeholders concerning corporate citizenship and sustainability matters. From time to time, we may announce certain initiatives, including goals regarding our focus areas, which include environmental matters, packaging, responsible sourcing and social investments. However, such initiatives can be costly and may not have the desired effect. For example, we could fail, or be perceived to fail, in our achievement of such initiatives or goals or in accurately reporting our progress on such initiatives and goals. In addition, such initiatives and reporting often rely on methodologies, standards, and data that are subject to varying interpretations and continuing to evolve. Our approach to such matters likewise evolves, and we cannot guarantee that our approach will align with the expectations of any particular stakeholder. Stakeholder expectations (as well as associated ratings and assessments) are not uniform, which can result in additional costs or complexities in navigating these matters. Any such matters, or related corporate citizenship and sustainability matters, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Furthermore, ESG-related legislation and regulation is being implemented across the world, including in the United States, and any such legislation or regulation may impose additional compliance burdens on us and on third parties in our value chain, which could potentially result in increased administrative costs, decreased demand in the marketplace for our products, and/or increased costs for our supplies and products. For example, policymakers such as the SEC, various US states, and the European Union have adopted (or are considering adopting) rules for various climate- or ESG-related disclosures or actions. While certain of these rules have been challenged or paused, the imposition of such obligations either now or in future may cause us to incur significant expenditures, which will then increase our operating expenses. As with other stakeholders, such regulations are not uniform (and at times may even contradict), which can increase the cost and complexity of compliance, as well as associated risks.
We aim to appropriately consider and manage ESG matters related to our business. However, in light of increasing scrutiny from investors, customers, consumers, employees, policymakers and other stakeholders (as well as fragmentation in such stakeholders' expectations), there can be no certainty that we will manage such issues successfully. Increasingly, both advocates and opponents of certain ESG efforts are resorting to activism, including litigation, to advance their perspectives. Responding to such efforts is costly, and any failure to successfully navigate stakeholder expectations or legal requirements (including any novel interpretations of existing laws and regulations) may result in negative publicity, reputational damage, issues with attracting or retaining customers, consumers or employees, regulatory or investor engagement, or other issues, which will adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations. We may be particularly vulnerable to some forms of scrutiny due to our articulated purposes to offer inclusive, accessible, clean, vegan and cruelty free cosmetics and skin care products. Additionally, certain of our stakeholders may be subject to similar risks as described in this risk factor, which may exacerbate or may result in additional or more severe risks to us.