As climate change issues become more pronounced, we may correspondingly face increased regulation and also expectations from our stakeholders to take actions beyond existing regulatory requirements to minimize our impact on the environment and mitigate climate change related effects.
The semiconductor manufacturing process has historically contributed to direct greenhouse gas emissions by utilizing perfluorocarbons, which may lead to new or increased regulation of such compounds. In order to address such regulation, we may be required to adapt our production processes or purchase additional equipment or carbon offsets, leading to increased costs. We are on track to be carbon neutral in all direct and indirect emissions (scopes 1 and 2), product transportation, business travel, and employee commuting emissions (our scope 3 focus), and to achieve our 100% renewable electricity sourcing goal by the end of 2027 (as further explained below in "Item 4. – Environmental, Health and Safety Matters").
To meet these additional regulatory requirements, expectations, and goals, we will need to continue to deploy additional equipment, introduce process changes, utilize alternative suppliers and materials, and take other similar actions, some or all of which may require us to incur additional costs which could result in a material adverse effect on our results of operations and our financial condition. To address climate change mitigation of our own operations, we have purchased renewable energy and may from time to time purchase renewable energy and/or carbon credits. In addition, if we fail to meet these requirements, expectations, or goals, or foster additional sustainability initiatives, we may experience reputational and/or litigation risk which could impact our ability to attract and retain customers, employees, and investors, as well as restrict our access to public funding.
Further, our sites, as well as those of our partners along the supply chain, may be exposed to changing and/or increasing physical risks resulting from climate change that are either chronic (induced by longer-term shifts in climate patterns, such as sea level rise or constraints in the availability of water, changing temperature, wind or precipitation patterns) or acute (event-driven such as cyclones, hurricanes or heat waves). In the context of the transition to a lower-carbon economy, we will likely be exposed to further policy, legal, technology, and market transition risks. We have already seen further policy developments in this area in the form of Regulation (EU) 2020/852 of the European Parliament and of the Council of June 18, 2020 on the establishment of a framework to facilitate sustainable investment and amending Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 (the "EU Taxonomy Regulation"), which entered into force on July 12, 2020. As a result of the EU Taxonomy Regulation, we must disclose information on how and to what extent our activities are associated with economic activities that qualify as environmentally sustainable.
Enhanced focus on issues concerning the protection of human rights, labor laws, environmental justice and climate change are resulting in a more complex regulatory environment, leading to potential additional legal risks, penalties or taxes. Directive (EU) 2022/2464 of the European Parliament and of the Council of December 14, 2022 amending Regulation (EU) No 537/2014, Directive 2004/109/EC, Directive 2006/43/EC and Directive 2013/34/EU, as regards corporate sustainability reporting (the "CSRD"), which entered into force on January 5, 2023, as well as the European Sustainability Reporting Standards ("ESRS") published on July 31, 2023, strengthen the rules regarding social and environmental information that is required to be reported. See "Item 4. Information on the Company - Environmental, Health and Safety Matters".
The CSRD seeks to provide investors and other stakeholders with access to the information they need to assess investment risks arising from climate change, social impact, and other sustainability topics, including mandatory supply chain due diligence requirements and new third-party assurance obligations. Should our partners not comply with current regulations, their performance may detrimentally impact our own results on climate change mitigation, social impact, energy efficiency, water use, chemicals and pollution management, or waste disposal. Moreover, if our partners are unable to meet our climate change, social impact and sustainability criteria, we may engage with alternative partners at a higher cost.
In addition, California's climate disclosure laws, such as AB 1305 (the "Voluntary Carbon Market Disclosures Act"), impose requirements to disclose scope 1, 2, and 3 GHG emissions, climate-related financial risks, information relating to any net-zero or carbon-neutral claims made and project-specific information upon purchase or use of certain voluntary carbon credits in California.
Any of the above requirements may in the future overlap in scope and diverge in content with each other and/or the rules of other jurisdictions to which we may be subject. If our disclosure metrics relating to climate change and other sustainability topics are lower than those of our peers in the industry, or are otherwise regarded as insufficient, this may lead to reputational risk which may lead to onward financial repercussions such as a decrease in share price or difficulty in raising capital.
In parallel, environmental, social and governance ("ESG") practices, especially regarding equal opportunity, have been increasingly subject to political controversy in the United States, most recently as a result of various executive orders signed by the current U.S. administration, aimed at limiting equal opportunities initiatives in the workplace. Our policies and practices regarding equal access and other ESG-related matters, including previously established goals and initiatives, or disclosures that may be required by non-U.S. laws, may expose us to legal, reputational and other risks, including ESG and equal opportunity-related orders, investigations, legislation, litigation, media coverage and scrutiny, boycotts and negative publicity from investors and other stakeholders.
This enhanced focus and increased regulations and initiatives, as well as related stakeholder expectations, have been and may continue to be subject to rapid and extensive change or reversal, and have resulted and may result in conflicts between regulatory regimes and stakeholders.