| Breakdown | TTM | Mar 2025 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Income Statement | ||||||
| Total Revenue | 28.38B | 28.80B | 25.11B | 20.19B | 9.85B | 4.94B |
| Gross Profit | 19.41B | 13.53B | 17.93B | 13.95B | 4.90B | -2.41B |
| EBITDA | 10.94B | 11.53B | 10.32B | 6.03B | 765.20M | -2.94B |
| Net Income | 6.65B | 7.39B | 6.39B | 3.15B | -974.55M | -3.70B |
Balance Sheet | ||||||
| Total Assets | 58.97B | 58.40B | 50.48B | 44.07B | 41.40B | 41.32B |
| Cash, Cash Equivalents and Short-Term Investments | 11.12B | 10.51B | 7.43B | 3.99B | 2.03B | 1.64B |
| Total Debt | 2.50B | 2.65B | 1.99B | 2.38B | 4.75B | 5.10B |
| Total Liabilities | 10.65B | 10.96B | 9.62B | 9.35B | 10.16B | 9.33B |
| Stockholders Equity | 47.06B | 46.13B | 39.40B | 33.75B | 30.27B | 31.04B |
Cash Flow | ||||||
| Free Cash Flow | 1.01B | 3.42B | 4.89B | 4.76B | -856.34M | -2.12B |
| Operating Cash Flow | 2.61B | 8.25B | 7.12B | 6.14B | -186.92M | -1.39B |
| Investing Cash Flow | -3.25B | -3.72B | -5.41B | -2.98B | 235.07M | -526.79M |
| Financing Cash Flow | -1.38B | -1.13B | -1.67B | -2.99B | 203.15M | 1.70B |
Name | Overall Rating | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | ROE | Dividend Yield | Revenue Growth | EPS Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
76 Outperform | ₹2.53B | 51.20 | ― | 0.68% | -3.36% | -6.25% | |
75 Outperform | ₹18.36B | 13.46 | ― | 0.98% | 1.40% | 18.39% | |
72 Outperform | ₹196.77B | 23.67 | ― | 0.41% | 7.74% | 0.11% | |
61 Neutral | $18.38B | 12.79 | -2.54% | 3.03% | 1.52% | -15.83% | |
56 Neutral | ₹81.52B | 50.31 | ― | ― | 16.03% | 44.95% | |
55 Neutral | ₹26.11B | 13.93 | ― | 4.70% | -16.43% | -75.38% | |
47 Neutral | ₹6.12B | 313.53 | ― | 0.42% | -0.11% | -159.33% |
EIH Limited has disclosed that the Additional Commissioner of State Tax in Mumbai has imposed a penalty of ₹29.98 crore under the Maharashtra VAT Act, 2002 on its Mumbai-based hotels and divisions, largely linked to what the authorities describe as arbitrary enhancement of food and beverage income and other output services for the 2016–17 financial year. The company, which had previously secured a settlement for the same period under the 2023 Maharashtra tax amnesty scheme, is now reassessing the legal validity of this review order and plans to initiate appropriate legal proceedings within statutory timelines, introducing potential tax-related uncertainty for its Mumbai operations and signaling a possible dispute over retrospective tax treatment in the state’s hospitality sector.